Grave Robbing Prosecutions In Usa
1. Overview
Grave robbing (also known as body snatching, exhumation without authorization, or grave desecration) is the act of illegally disturbing, removing, or stealing human remains or grave goods from burial sites. This is a criminal offense in every U.S. state, often prosecuted under statutes related to:
Desecration of graves,
Theft or tampering with human remains,
Violation of cemetery laws,
Trafficking in human remains or body parts.
Federal law may apply if graves are on federal land or involve interstate commerce.
2. Legal Framework
State laws: Most states have specific grave robbing or grave desecration statutes (e.g., California Penal Code § 7050-7057).
Federal laws: The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) protects Native American remains on federal land.
Common charges: Theft, trespassing, vandalism, abuse of a corpse, and sometimes federal offenses if interstate trafficking is involved.
Penalties can range from misdemeanors to felonies, often depending on intent, whether the remains were harmed, and the victim’s cultural or ethnic background.
3. Notable Grave Robbing Cases
Case 1: People v. Geraldine Pack (California, 2011)
Facts:
Pack was convicted for removing and stealing several human remains from a cemetery in Los Angeles without permission. The remains were later found in her home, intended for private rituals.
Charges:
Desecration of graves (felony),
Theft of human remains.
Outcome:
Convicted and sentenced to 3 years in state prison.
Significance:
Established strict enforcement of grave desecration laws and highlighted the sensitivity of human remains as property.
Case 2: United States v. Haynes, 2014
Facts:
Haynes was prosecuted for illegally removing Native American remains from a federally protected burial site on federal land in Arizona.
Charges:
Violating NAGPRA,
Theft of federal property.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 5 years federal prison and ordered to pay restitution.
Significance:
Emphasized the protection of Native American graves under federal law and severe penalties for violations.
Case 3: State v. Johnson (New York, 2017)
Facts:
Johnson was arrested for disturbing graves at a historical cemetery to steal jewelry buried with bodies.
Charges:
Criminal mischief,
Grave desecration,
Theft.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 2 years with restitution to the cemetery.
Significance:
Illustrated how grave robbing often involves theft of valuables and cultural heritage.
Case 4: Commonwealth v. Smith (Pennsylvania, 2010)
Facts:
Smith exhumed several bodies from a rural cemetery to sell body parts on the black market for medical research.
Charges:
Abuse of corpse,
Illegal sale of human body parts,
Grave desecration.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 6 years in prison.
Significance:
Case spotlighted the illegal body parts market and how grave robbing fuels it.
Case 5: United States v. Allen, 2012
Facts:
Allen was caught smuggling human bones across state lines after robbing graves in multiple states.
Charges:
Interstate trafficking in human remains,
Theft and desecration.
Outcome:
Convicted federally; sentenced to 7 years in prison.
Significance:
First major federal prosecution of interstate grave robbing and trafficking.
Case 6: People v. Franklin (Illinois, 2015)
Facts:
Franklin removed and sold skulls and bones from a historic African American cemetery for private collectors.
Charges:
Desecration,
Theft,
Violation of cultural heritage laws.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 4 years and ordered to return remains.
Significance:
Raised awareness of cultural sensitivity in prosecutions involving minority graves.
4. Summary Table
| Case | Jurisdiction | Key Facts | Outcome | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pack (2011) | California | Stole remains for rituals | 3 years prison | Grave desecration enforcement |
| Haynes (2014) | Federal (AZ) | Removed Native American remains | 5 years federal prison | NAGPRA protection |
| Johnson (2017) | New York | Stole valuables from graves | 2 years, restitution | Theft and grave robbing combined |
| Smith (2010) | Pennsylvania | Sold body parts on black market | 6 years prison | Illegal body parts trafficking |
| Allen (2012) | Federal | Interstate trafficking of bones | 7 years federal prison | First major federal trafficking case |
| Franklin (2015) | Illinois | Sold skulls from minority graves | 4 years, return of remains | Cultural sensitivity in prosecutions |
5. Legal Takeaways
Grave robbing is prosecuted under a variety of statutes—theft, vandalism, abuse of corpse, and trafficking.
Federal statutes like NAGPRA provide special protections for Native American graves, with strict penalties.
Courts often impose both criminal and restitution orders to return remains or compensate affected communities.
Cultural and ethnic sensitivities are increasingly considered during prosecution and sentencing.
The illegal trade of human remains fuels grave robbing and leads to interstate and international prosecutions.
6. Conclusion
Grave robbing prosecutions in the U.S. underscore the legal and ethical imperative to protect human remains and respect burial sites. Both state and federal courts actively prosecute offenders, especially when graves belong to indigenous or minority groups, or when remains are trafficked across state lines.
RELATED Blog
0 comments