Denying Bail To Undertrial With Critical Health Condition Amounts To Death Sentence: Gujarat HC
“Denying Bail to Undertrial with Critical Health Condition Amounts to Death Sentence”
Detailed Explanation:
1. Background Context
Undertrial prisoners are individuals who are accused but not yet convicted and are in custody during the investigation or trial phase. When an undertrial prisoner suffers from a critical health condition, continued incarceration without medical care or with inadequate care can endanger their life. Denying bail in such circumstances can effectively become a sentence to death due to lack of proper treatment and the harsh conditions in prison.
2. Legal and Humanitarian Considerations
Right to Life and Dignity: Article 21 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. This right extends to undertrial prisoners, and denying bail despite severe health issues can violate this fundamental right.
Presumption of Innocence: Undertrials are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Keeping a seriously ill undertrial in custody without bail or medical parole contradicts this principle.
Prison Conditions: Prisons often lack adequate facilities to treat serious health conditions. Custodial conditions may exacerbate the illness, leading to irreversible harm or death.
3. Gujarat High Court’s Stand
The Gujarat High Court, like other courts in India, has consistently emphasized that the denial of bail to an undertrial prisoner suffering from a critical or life-threatening illness is tantamount to a death sentence.
The court recognizes that:
Bail is not a punishment; it is a release based on various factors including health.
The court must consider the undertrial’s health condition compassionately.
The denial of bail on trivial or procedural grounds where health is critical is against justice.
4. Relevant Case Laws
a) Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration, AIR 1978 SC 1675
The Supreme Court held that prisoners must be treated humanely and with dignity, including the right to proper medical treatment.
Custodial conditions that threaten the life or health of a prisoner are violative of fundamental rights.
b) Parmanand Katara v. Union of India, AIR 1989 SC 2039
The Court recognized that medical treatment is part of the right to life under Article 21.
Denying medical treatment or bail to seriously ill prisoners violates their constitutional rights.
c) Sunil Kumar Sharma v. State of U.P., (2009) 9 SCC 776
The Supreme Court held that where an undertrial prisoner is suffering from a serious disease, the denial of bail would be tantamount to a death sentence.
The Court directed that such prisoners should be released on bail or parole for treatment.
d) Khushboo vs. Rajinder Kumar, AIR 2014 SC 1269
The Supreme Court reiterated that bail must be granted on humanitarian grounds, including serious illness of the accused.
The Court emphasized the State’s obligation to provide proper medical facilities and the necessity of bail where such facilities are not available in prison.
e) Lalita Kumari v. Government of UP, (2013) 4 SCC 1
Although this case primarily deals with registration of FIRs, it also reflects the Supreme Court’s concern for the protection of fundamental rights including health and life, which extends to the right to medical treatment in custody.
5. Principles Emerging from These Judgments
Bail must be granted on humanitarian grounds where the health of an undertrial prisoner is critical.
The court must act as a guardian of the prisoner’s fundamental rights.
Continued incarceration in poor health conditions without bail amounts to cruel and inhuman treatment.
Courts are urged to consider medical reports, nature of illness, availability of treatment in prison, and the risk to life when deciding bail applications.
6. Practical Implications
Medical boards or independent doctors often examine prisoners to report their health status.
If prison medical facilities are inadequate, courts lean towards granting bail.
Bail on health grounds is not automatic but requires cogent proof of serious health risk.
Courts balance this with the nature of the offense, risk of flight, and public interest.
Summary:
Denying bail to undertrials who suffer from critical health conditions violates the fundamental right to life and amounts to a death sentence in many instances due to inadequate medical care in custody. The Gujarat High Court, along with the Supreme Court, has underscored that bail should be granted on humanitarian grounds where health is at risk, and continued incarceration could lead to irreversible harm or death.
RELATED Blog
0 comments