Multilevel Marketing Fraud Prosecutions
Overview: Multilevel Marketing Fraud
MLM fraud occurs when companies operating under the guise of legitimate multilevel marketing schemes engage in deceptive practices, such as:
Promising high income primarily from recruiting rather than selling real products.
Misrepresenting product efficacy or market demand.
Charging upfront fees for starter kits with inflated claims of earnings.
Failing to disclose the low probability of earning income for most participants.
Legal frameworks applicable include:
Mail and Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. §§1341, 1343) – for schemes involving electronic communications or postal services.
FTC Act (15 U.S.C. §§45(a)) – prohibits deceptive and unfair business practices.
Securities Laws (if MLM involves investment schemes) – if participants invest money with the expectation of profits from recruitment.
State Consumer Protection and Pyramid Scheme Laws – regulate recruitment-based marketing schemes.
Penalties include fines, restitution, and imprisonment.
Notable Cases
1. United States v. BurnLounge Inc. (2012) – Pyramid Scheme
Jurisdiction: Federal Court, California
Summary: BurnLounge operated a music distribution MLM, earning revenue primarily from recruiting new members rather than selling music.
Violation: Mail fraud, wire fraud, and pyramid scheme violations.
Outcome: The company was shut down; executives fined and barred from operating MLMs.
Significance: Highlighted that recruitment-focused MLMs without legitimate product sales can be prosecuted.
2. United States v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing (2013) – Nationwide MLM Fraud
Jurisdiction: Federal Court, Maine
Summary: FHTM recruited participants with promises of high earnings through product sales but primarily profited from recruitment fees.
Violation: Wire fraud, mail fraud, and consumer fraud.
Outcome: Executives sentenced to prison (up to 10 years); $169 million restitution ordered; business assets seized.
Significance: Demonstrated federal crackdown on large-scale MLM pyramid schemes.
3. United States v. Vemma Nutrition (2015) – Pyramid MLM
Jurisdiction: Federal Court, Arizona
Summary: Vemma recruited young adults to sell dietary supplements, but revenue largely came from recruitment.
Violation: FTC and wire fraud violations; deceptive income claims.
Outcome: FTC shut down operations; assets frozen; operators banned from MLM activities.
Significance: Reinforced FTC’s authority to intervene in MLMs operating as pyramids.
4. United States v. Fortune Global Marketing (2016) – International MLM Scam
Jurisdiction: Federal Court, Massachusetts
Summary: FGM ran an international MLM, promising high returns through recruitment while minimal product sales occurred.
Violation: Wire fraud, mail fraud, and conspiracy.
Outcome: Operators sentenced to 5–7 years imprisonment; $200 million restitution; assets seized.
Significance: Showed cross-border MLM fraud can trigger federal criminal charges.
5. United States v. Herbalife Executives (2018) – Misleading Income Claims
Jurisdiction: Federal Court, California
Summary: Herbalife executives misrepresented potential earnings to recruits. While not a full pyramid, FTC and DOJ investigated deceptive practices.
Violation: Wire fraud, mail fraud, and deceptive business practices.
Outcome: Herbalife paid $200 million settlement; executives required to restructure compensation; banned from misleading income claims.
Significance: Demonstrated that even large, legitimate MLMs are liable for fraudulent income misrepresentations.
6. United States v. Zeek Rewards (2019) – Ponzi-Style MLM
Jurisdiction: Federal Court, North Carolina
Summary: Zeek Rewards promised high returns from selling “ad revenue sharing,” but the scheme relied on new investor recruitment.
Violation: Mail fraud, wire fraud, and securities fraud.
Outcome: 5 years imprisonment for main operator; $600 million restitution; assets forfeited.
Significance: Highlighted the overlap of MLMs with Ponzi schemes when recruitment funds payout earlier participants.
7. United States v. AdvoCare International (2020) – Pyramid Scheme Allegations
Jurisdiction: Federal Court, Texas
Summary: AdvoCare faced allegations that it incentivized recruitment over actual product sales.
Violation: Settlement with FTC; civil fraud allegations, no criminal charges, but included compliance orders.
Outcome: Company restructured compensation plan to emphasize product sales; operators barred from misleading income claims.
Significance: Demonstrated regulatory enforcement even in borderline cases to protect participants.
Key Takeaways
Recruitment-Focused MLMs Are Most Vulnerable: Schemes earning money primarily from recruiting are frequently prosecuted.
Wire and Mail Fraud Are Central: Fraudulent representations over digital platforms or mail trigger federal penalties.
Prison Terms and Restitution Are Significant: Multi-year sentences and multi-million dollar restitution are common.
FTC Plays a Key Role: Regulatory enforcement often accompanies criminal prosecution.
International Operations Are Not Immune: MLM fraud with cross-border recruitment can lead to federal prosecution.
RELATED Blog
0 comments