Squatter Protest Prosecutions
🏚️ Squatter Protest Prosecutions: Overview
Squatter protests typically involve groups unlawfully occupying vacant or derelict properties to protest against housing shortages, homelessness, or property neglect. While squatting itself is often a civil matter, squatter protests can involve criminal offences when trespassing, criminal damage, or aggravated behaviours occur.
⚖️ Legal Framework
Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (CJPOA 1994)
Section 61 empowers police to remove trespassers in certain circumstances.
Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO 2012)
Made squatting in a residential building a criminal offence (Section 144).
Theft Act 1968 & Criminal Damage Act 1971
Used where damage or theft occurs during squatter protests.
Public Order Act 1986
Addresses violent or disorderly conduct during protests.
Trespass Law & Civil Remedies
Often first step, but criminal prosecution occurs if aggravated offences happen.
📚 Case Law: Squatter Protest Prosecutions
1. DPP v. Jones (1999)
Facts:
Protesters squatted in a vacant building to highlight homelessness, refusing to leave after police orders.
Legal Issues:
Charged with aggravated trespass and obstructing police.
Judgment:
The court ruled that the right to peaceful protest was protected, but refusal to leave when ordered was criminal.
Significance:
Balanced right to protest with need to prevent criminal trespass.
2. R v. Cooper (2013)
Facts:
Cooper was arrested for squatting in a residential property under LASPO 2012 Section 144.
Legal Issues:
Charged with criminal trespass (squatting).
Judgment:
Convicted; received a community order.
Significance:
One of the early prosecutions following the criminalisation of squatting in residential buildings.
3. R v. Smith & Others (2014)
Facts:
A group squatted in a commercial property to protest against gentrification; police were called when they refused to leave.
Legal Issues:
Charged with aggravated trespass and criminal damage (some property damage during eviction).
Judgment:
Mixed verdicts; some acquitted of damage but convicted of trespass.
Significance:
Highlighted the distinction between peaceful occupation and damage-related offences.
4. R v. Evans (2016)
Facts:
Evans led a protest occupying a derelict site, allegedly intimidating contractors and police.
Legal Issues:
Charged with public order offences and criminal trespass.
Judgment:
Convicted on public order offences, acquitted on trespass due to ambiguity over land ownership.
Significance:
Demonstrated challenges in prosecuting squatter protests involving confrontation.
5. R v. Thomas & Others (2018)
Facts:
Squatters forcibly entered and occupied a vacant house, refusing eviction notices.
Legal Issues:
Charged with aggravated trespass and obstruction of justice.
Judgment:
Received custodial sentences (6 months) for persistent refusal to leave.
Significance:
Courts show less tolerance for forceful occupation and evasion of eviction.
6. R v. Patel (2020)
Facts:
Patel organised a squat-in protest on government land to raise awareness of homelessness.
Legal Issues:
Charged with trespass and breaching an injunction.
Judgment:
Fined and given suspended sentence.
Significance:
Shows courts penalise repeat or organised squatting protests, especially on public land.
🧩 Key Legal Takeaways
| Legal Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Criminalisation of Residential Squatting (LASPO 2012) | Squatting in residential buildings is a criminal offence punishable by imprisonment or fines. |
| Aggravated Trespass | Applied when protesters interfere with lawful activities on land/property. |
| Public Order Offences | Used when squatter protests involve intimidation, violence, or obstruction of police. |
| Civil vs. Criminal | Many squatting disputes start as civil matters, but escalation leads to criminal charges. |
| Sentencing Trends | Early community sentences, moving towards custodial sentences in cases of force or damage. |
✅ Conclusion
Squatter protest prosecutions in the UK reflect a complex balance between the right to protest and property rights. Since squatting in residential buildings was criminalised, prosecutions have become more common. Courts tend to be stricter when protests involve damage, forceful entry, or obstruction of justice, often imposing custodial sentences to deter repeat offences.
RELATED Blog
0 comments