Magistrate Cannot Compel Attendance Of Witness Who Has Already Been Cross Examined Unless Satisfied That It Is...
Magistrate Cannot Compel Attendance of Witness Who Has Already Been Cross-Examined Unless Satisfied That It Is Necessary
🔹 Principle Explained:
Once a witness has been examined and cross-examined, their evidence is considered largely complete.
The Magistrate does not have arbitrary power to compel their attendance again for repeated examination unless there is sufficient reason to do so.
The Magistrate must be convinced that recalling the witness is necessary to serve the ends of justice.
🔹 Judicial Reasoning:
Finality of Witness Testimony
The judicial process expects witnesses to present their testimony fully in one go.
Continuous recall of the same witness without valid reason wastes time and leads to harassment.
Magistrate’s Discretion
The Magistrate holds the discretionary power to summon witnesses under relevant procedural laws.
However, this discretion must be exercised judiciously and not arbitrarily.
Requirement of Justification
To compel attendance after cross-examination, the Magistrate must be satisfied about:
New facts or evidence have emerged,
The witness’s further testimony is critical for justice,
Previous examination was incomplete or unsatisfactory.
Avoiding Harassment and Delay
Unnecessary summons cause harassment to witnesses and delay trial proceedings.
Courts emphasize efficient trial management and discouraging abuse of procedural powers.
🔹 Illustrative Scenario:
Witness X has been examined and cross-examined during trial.
Later, prosecution requests the Magistrate to recall witness X for further questioning.
The Magistrate, before summoning, must be satisfied that additional testimony is essential and not just for prolonging the case.
If no such satisfaction exists, the Magistrate should refuse to compel attendance.
🔹 Key Points Summarized:
| Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Cross-examination marks end of evidence | Witness testimony considered largely complete |
| Magistrate’s power is discretionary | Must be exercised judiciously, not arbitrarily |
| Must be satisfied about necessity | Recall only if new evidence or facts emerge |
| Avoid unnecessary summons | Prevents harassment and delays |
🔹 Case Law Reasoning (General)
Courts have ruled that compelling attendance repeatedly without cause is an abuse of process.
The discretion of the Magistrate to summon witnesses is not unfettered and must be based on sound judicial reasoning.
Courts have quashed summons issued without adequate justification after cross-examination.
🔹 Conclusion:
The Magistrate’s power to compel attendance of a witness who has already been cross-examined is subject to strict judicial scrutiny and cannot be exercised unless the Magistrate is satisfied about the necessity of further testimony. This protects witnesses from harassment and ensures trials proceed efficiently and fairly.
RELATED Blog
0 comments