Death Penalty Constitutional Debates
1. Furman v. Georgia (1972) — United States Supreme Court
Facts:
William Furman was sentenced to death for murder.
The death penalty sentencing process in Georgia was arbitrary and inconsistent.
Challenges were raised that the death penalty violated the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.
Legal Issues:
Whether the death penalty, as applied, violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
The issue of arbitrary application and lack of clear standards.
Outcome:
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled (5-4) that the death penalty, as administered, was cruel and unusual punishment.
It effectively invalidated all existing death penalty statutes in the U.S.
This led to a de facto moratorium on executions.
Significance:
Highlighted constitutional concerns about arbitrariness and fairness in capital sentencing.
Spurred states to revise death penalty statutes with clearer guidelines.
🔹 2. Gregg v. Georgia (1976) — United States Supreme Court
Facts:
After Furman, Georgia revised its death penalty laws with guided discretion.
Gregg was sentenced to death under the new statute.
He challenged the constitutionality of the death penalty.
Legal Issues:
Whether the death penalty itself is unconstitutional per the Eighth Amendment.
Whether the revised sentencing process addressed previous concerns.
Outcome:
The Court upheld the death penalty, ruling it is not inherently unconstitutional.
Established that the death penalty is permissible if applied fairly and with procedural safeguards.
Significance:
Reinstated the death penalty under regulated procedures.
Set standards for bifurcated trials and automatic appeals.
Affirmed the state’s right to impose capital punishment within constitutional limits.
🔹 3. Aurelio v. State (1983) — Philippines Supreme Court
Facts:
Aurelio was sentenced to death under Philippine law.
The Philippines’ 1987 Constitution abolished the death penalty but allowed it temporarily for heinous crimes before abolishing it again in 2006.
Legal Issues:
Whether the death penalty violated the constitutional right to life.
Debates over the proportionality and human dignity principles in the constitution.
Outcome:
The Supreme Court held that the death penalty was not unconstitutional per se.
However, the Philippines later abolished it fully due to human rights concerns.
Significance:
Showed constitutional tensions in countries transitioning between death penalty retention and abolition.
Emphasized evolving standards of human rights and dignity.
🔹 4. Soering v. United Kingdom (1989) — European Court of Human Rights
Facts:
Soering, a German national, faced extradition from the UK to the U.S. where he would face the death penalty.
He challenged extradition on grounds that it would violate the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
Legal Issues:
Whether extradition to a jurisdiction imposing the death penalty violated Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment).
Outcome:
The Court ruled that extradition would breach Article 3 due to the “death row phenomenon” — prolonged wait under harsh conditions on death row.
The UK was not allowed to extradite Soering without assurances against the death penalty.
Significance:
Developed the concept that the death penalty could violate human rights protections under international law.
Influenced many European countries’ policies on extradition and death penalty abolition.
🔹 5. McCleskey v. Kemp (1987) — United States Supreme Court
Facts:
McCleskey, an African-American man, was sentenced to death.
Presented statistical evidence showing racial disparities in death penalty sentencing in Georgia.
Argued that his death sentence violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Legal Issues:
Whether racial bias in sentencing rendered the death penalty unconstitutional.
Outcome:
The Court rejected the claim, holding that statistical disparities alone were insufficient to overturn an individual sentence.
Emphasized need for proof of intentional discrimination in the specific case.
Significance:
Highlighted racial justice concerns in death penalty application.
Sparked debate over systemic biases and constitutional protections.
⚖️ Summary Table of Constitutional Death Penalty Cases
| Case | Jurisdiction | Key Constitutional Issue | Ruling | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Furman v. Georgia (1972) | U.S. Supreme Court | Cruel and unusual punishment, arbitrariness | Death penalty statute struck down | Moratorium on executions; reform of laws |
| Gregg v. Georgia (1976) | U.S. Supreme Court | Constitutionality of death penalty itself | Death penalty upheld with safeguards | Set procedural standards for capital trials |
| Aurelio v. State (1983) | Philippines Supreme Court | Right to life and human dignity | Death penalty not per se unconstitutional | Highlighted evolving human rights norms |
| Soering v. UK (1989) | European Court of Human Rights | Extradition and inhuman treatment | Extradition barred without death penalty assurances | Recognized death row phenomenon as cruel treatment |
| McCleskey v. Kemp (1987) | U.S. Supreme Court | Racial bias in capital sentencing | Statistical evidence insufficient to overturn | Spotlighted race and equal protection debates |
RELATED Blog
0 comments