Environmental Crime Prosecutions
What Are Environmental Crimes?
Environmental crimes refer to illegal acts that harm the environment. They include:
Illegal dumping of hazardous waste.
Pollution of air, water, and soil.
Illegal logging and deforestation.
Wildlife trafficking and poaching.
Violations of environmental permits and regulations.
Enforcement Challenges
Complexity of environmental regulations.
Difficulty proving causation and harm.
Cross-border and transnational nature of many crimes.
Need for specialized knowledge and resources.
Legal Tools for Prosecution
National environmental protection laws.
International agreements (e.g., CITES, Basel Convention).
Criminal sanctions, fines, imprisonment, and remediation orders.
Civil liability and class actions.
🔹 Landmark Environmental Crime Prosecution Cases
1. United States v. ExxonMobil (2009, U.S.)
Issue: Pollution and violations of the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act at ExxonMobil facilities.
Background:
The U.S. government accused ExxonMobil of violating pollution limits by illegally discharging pollutants and exceeding emission standards at multiple plants.
Ruling:
ExxonMobil agreed to pay over $20 million in fines and undertake corrective measures.
The case included injunctions requiring improved environmental controls.
Impact:
Signaled increased enforcement against large corporations.
Demonstrated federal willingness to pursue major polluters.
2. R v. Thames Water Utilities Ltd (2017, UK)
Issue: Illegal discharge of sewage into rivers violating the Water Resources Act.
Background:
Thames Water was prosecuted for repeated discharges of untreated sewage into the River Thames and tributaries.
Ruling:
The company pleaded guilty and was fined £20 million, one of the largest environmental fines in the UK.
Ordered to improve infrastructure to prevent future pollution.
Impact:
Highlighted accountability of utility companies for environmental harm.
Encouraged infrastructure investment for pollution control.
3. R v. Chevron Corp. (Ecuador case, ongoing internationally)
Issue: Alleged environmental damage and pollution in the Ecuadorian Amazon from oil drilling.
Background:
Indigenous communities and environmental groups accused Chevron of dumping toxic waste causing widespread environmental degradation and health problems.
Rulings and Developments:
Ecuadorian courts ordered Chevron to pay billions in damages.
Chevron contested jurisdiction and enforcement internationally.
Legal battles in U.S. and other courts focused on fraud and jurisdictional issues.
Impact:
Highlighted challenges of transnational environmental justice.
Raised questions about corporate accountability in developing countries.
4. People v. Monsanto Co. (2019, U.S. State court)
Issue: Alleged violation of environmental laws related to herbicide contamination and health hazards.
Background:
Monsanto (now part of Bayer) faced lawsuits alleging that its products caused environmental harm and health risks.
Ruling:
Courts allowed some lawsuits to proceed, focusing on claims of negligence and failure to warn.
Monsanto faced large jury verdicts and settlements in some cases.
Impact:
Set precedents on corporate liability for chemical pollutants.
Raised awareness about environmental health concerns.
5. United States v. Volkswagen AG (2017, U.S.)
Issue: Emissions cheating scandal violating the Clean Air Act.
Background:
Volkswagen installed defeat devices in diesel vehicles to cheat emissions tests, releasing excess pollutants.
Ruling:
Volkswagen pleaded guilty to criminal charges and agreed to pay over $4 billion in fines and settlements.
Executives and engineers faced criminal investigations.
Impact:
Landmark case on corporate environmental fraud.
Highlighted enforcement of pollution regulations.
6. R v. Rio Tinto plc (2015, Australia)
Issue: Environmental damage and violations related to mining activities.
Background:
Rio Tinto was prosecuted for pollution and environmental harm due to mining operations affecting water sources.
Ruling:
Company was fined millions and ordered to implement stricter controls.
Required to engage with local communities on remediation.
Impact:
Demonstrated mining sector accountability.
Emphasized the need for sustainable mining practices.
7. The International Whaling Commission v. Japan (2014, International Court of Justice)
Issue: Legality of Japan’s “scientific” whaling program.
Background:
The IWC challenged Japan’s whaling as commercial hunting disguised as scientific research, violating the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling.
Ruling:
The ICJ ruled that Japan’s program was not for scientific purposes.
Japan was ordered to cease whaling activities under the program.
Impact:
Affirmed international regulation and protection of endangered species.
Set precedent on limits of scientific exemptions in environmental law.
🔹 Summary
Environmental crime prosecutions span local, national, and international jurisdictions.
Cases often involve corporate defendants and large penalties.
Courts are increasingly willing to enforce environmental laws rigorously.
Transnational cases highlight challenges in enforcement and accountability.
These cases promote stronger corporate compliance and environmental protection.
RELATED Blog
0 comments