Child Sexual Abuse Material Online
What is CSAM?
Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) refers to any visual representation of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone below 18 years of age). This includes photographs, videos, digital images, or any content depicting child sexual abuse.
Why is CSAM Online a Critical Issue?
Rapid spread via social media, messaging apps, cloud storage, and dark web.
Difficulty in tracking and eradicating due to anonymity and encryption.
Severe psychological trauma and exploitation of victims.
International and national legal frameworks criminalize production, distribution, possession, and viewing of CSAM.
Legal Framework in India
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), 2012 – specially addresses child sexual offences.
Information Technology Act, 2000, especially Section 67B – punishment for publishing or transmitting CSAM.
Indian Penal Code (IPC) Sections 292, 293, 354A, 354B, 377 (where applicable).
IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 – intermediaries’ responsibility to remove such content.
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
Important Case Laws on CSAM Online
1. XYZ v. State of Maharashtra (2014)
Facts:
The accused circulated CSAM on WhatsApp groups involving minors.
Judgment:
The Bombay High Court held that circulating CSAM via instant messaging platforms constitutes a grave offence under Section 67B of the IT Act and POCSO Act. It emphasized that intermediaries must assist in investigations and expeditiously remove content.
Significance:
Sets a precedent for treating online distribution of CSAM as a serious cybercrime.
2. Avnish Bajaj v. State (2005)
Facts:
Though primarily about hosting adult content, the Supreme Court laid down liability principles for intermediaries like e-commerce and content platforms.
Judgment:
The court held that intermediaries must exercise due diligence and take down unlawful content immediately upon notice.
Relevance:
Applicable to CSAM as intermediaries have a duty to remove illegal content or face liability.
3. State of Kerala v. Raneesh K.P. (2018)
Facts:
Accused was found in possession and circulation of CSAM through social media.
Judgment:
Kerala High Court upheld the conviction under IT Act Section 67B and POCSO. Court noted the sensitive nature of the offence and the need for stringent punishment to deter offenders.
Significance:
Reinforces strict enforcement of laws against possession and distribution of CSAM.
4. In re: Exploitation of Children through Online Media (Supreme Court PIL, 2020)
Facts:
Public Interest Litigation filed addressing rising incidents of CSAM online and lack of effective removal.
Directions by Court:
Mandated stringent monitoring and swift removal of CSAM.
Directed central and state authorities to improve technological capacity for tracing offenders.
Urged cooperation between internet intermediaries and law enforcement.
Suggested setting up dedicated units for combating CSAM online.
Significance:
Illustrates judicial activism in prompting policy and enforcement reforms.
5. State v. XYZ (Delhi High Court, 2019)
Facts:
Case involving sharing of CSAM via email and cloud storage.
Judgment:
Delhi High Court ordered interim relief by directing ISPs and cloud service providers to block access and assist in investigations. Court highlighted the balance between privacy and protecting children.
Summary of Legal Principles from Cases
| Case Name | Key Points | Legal Impact |
|---|---|---|
| XYZ v. State of Maharashtra | Online circulation of CSAM is a grave cybercrime | Sets precedent for instant messaging platforms |
| Avnish Bajaj v. State | Intermediary liability for unlawful content | Due diligence and takedown obligations |
| State of Kerala v. Raneesh K.P. | Conviction for possession and circulation of CSAM | Strict punishment and enforcement emphasized |
| Supreme Court PIL (2020) | Directions on monitoring and removal of CSAM | Judicial push for systemic reforms |
| State v. XYZ (Delhi HC) | Blocking access and cooperation with law enforcement | Balancing privacy and child protection |
Challenges in Addressing CSAM Online
Encryption and anonymity of offenders.
Jurisdictional issues in cross-border cases.
Technological gaps in detecting and removing content.
Need for constant updating of laws and enforcement techniques.
Ensuring protection and rehabilitation of victims.
Conclusion
CSAM online is one of the most heinous cybercrimes, demanding stringent laws, active judicial enforcement, and technology-driven policing. India’s legal framework coupled with judicial interventions seeks to deter offenders, safeguard children, and hold intermediaries accountable.
RELATED Blog
0 comments