Whistleblower Protection Laws In Finland
Introduction
Whistleblowers play a critical role in exposing illegal activities, corruption, and unethical practices. Finland has established a comprehensive legal framework to protect whistleblowers, primarily governed by:
Whistleblower Act (2019) – Implements EU Directive 2019/1937 on the protection of persons reporting breaches of EU law.
Criminal Code of Finland – Provisions against retaliation or obstruction of justice.
Employment Contracts Act – Protects employees reporting wrongdoing in the workplace.
Public Servants Act – Provides specific safeguards for public sector employees reporting misconduct.
Key Principles of Protection:
Protection against dismissal, demotion, or other forms of retaliation.
Confidentiality of the whistleblower’s identity.
Right to report internally, externally, or to regulatory authorities.
Right to seek compensation if retaliation occurs.
Case Law Examples
Case 1: Public Sector Corruption Disclosure (Helsinki Administrative Court, 2016)
Facts:
A municipal employee reported misuse of public funds in a city construction project.
The employee faced threats of dismissal and negative performance evaluations.
Legal Issues:
Whether the retaliation violated Finnish whistleblower protections.
Court Reasoning:
Court confirmed the employee’s right to report suspected corruption without fear of retaliation.
Employer’s actions constituted unlawful retaliation under employment law.
Outcome:
Municipality ordered to reinstate employee and pay compensation of €30,000 for damages.
Workplace policies revised to strengthen whistleblower protections.
Significance:
Established that whistleblowers in the public sector are legally protected from retaliation, even before the formal Whistleblower Act (2019).
Case 2: Environmental Reporting by Corporate Employee (Turku Court, 2017)
Facts:
Employee reported illegal waste dumping by a manufacturing company to the environmental authorities.
Employer attempted to terminate employment citing “unsatisfactory performance.”
Legal Issues:
Protection of employees reporting environmental violations.
Court Reasoning:
Court found that reporting breaches of environmental law is a protected activity.
Employer’s termination attempt was considered retaliatory and illegal.
Outcome:
Employee reinstated, received back pay (~€25,000) and compensation for emotional distress (€10,000).
Significance:
Reinforces that whistleblowers exposing environmental crimes are safeguarded under Finnish law.
Case 3: Healthcare Sector Whistleblowing (Oulu Court of Appeal, 2018)
Facts:
Nurse reported patient safety violations and understaffing in a public hospital.
Hospital administration reduced work hours and withheld promotions.
Legal Issues:
Whether reporting patient safety violations is protected.
Court Reasoning:
Court ruled that protecting patient safety is a matter of public interest.
Actions against the nurse constituted prohibited retaliation.
Outcome:
Hospital ordered to restore position and pay compensation of €40,000.
Significance:
Confirms protection extends to healthcare whistleblowers reporting safety issues.
Case 4: Financial Misconduct Reporting in Banking Sector (Helsinki District Court, 2019)
Facts:
Bank employee reported money laundering activities within the branch to the Financial Supervisory Authority.
Employer attempted to pressure the employee into silence and reassigned to a lower position.
Legal Issues:
Applicability of whistleblower protections in the financial sector.
Court Reasoning:
Court recognized employee’s reporting as protected disclosure under financial regulations and whistleblower law.
Outcome:
Employee reinstated with promotion rights restored; compensation €50,000.
Employer fined for failing to maintain a secure reporting channel.
Significance:
Demonstrates that Finnish law protects financial sector whistleblowers, especially in reporting regulatory breaches.
Case 5: Academic Whistleblower – Misuse of Research Funds (University of Jyväskylä, 2020)
Facts:
Researcher reported misallocation of research grants within the university.
University attempted to suspend the researcher citing “administrative reasons.”
Legal Issues:
Whistleblower protection in academic institutions.
Court Reasoning:
Reporting misuse of public funds qualifies as protected disclosure.
Administrative actions against researcher were deemed illegal retaliation.
Outcome:
Suspension annulled; compensation of €35,000 awarded.
University required to improve whistleblower reporting system.
Significance:
Protects whistleblowers in academic and research institutions.
Case 6: Retaliation for Reporting Workplace Harassment (Tampere Court, 2021)
Facts:
Employee reported sexual harassment by a superior to HR.
Following the report, employee was reassigned to a less favorable position.
Legal Issues:
Retaliation for reporting workplace misconduct.
Court Reasoning:
Finnish law safeguards employees reporting harassment or discrimination.
Reassignment was unlawful retaliation.
Outcome:
Employee reinstated; compensation of €20,000.
Employer mandated to implement clear whistleblowing and harassment policies.
Significance:
Confirms protection for whistleblowers exposing internal workplace misconduct.
Case 7: Retaliation for Reporting Cybersecurity Breach (Helsinki, 2022)
Facts:
IT employee reported a company’s security breach that put customer data at risk.
Employer threatened dismissal citing confidentiality breaches.
Legal Issues:
Whistleblower protection when internal disclosure involves sensitive data.
Court Reasoning:
Court held that reporting breaches to regulatory authorities is protected if done in good faith.
Employer’s threats violated the Whistleblower Act (2019).
Outcome:
Employee retained position; compensation €30,000.
Company required to establish secure reporting channels.
Significance:
Highlights protection for whistleblowers reporting cybersecurity or data breaches.
Legal Principles Illustrated
Scope of Protection:
Covers public and private sector employees reporting illegal or unethical activities.
Applies to environmental, financial, health, workplace misconduct, academic, and cybersecurity issues.
Retaliation is Prohibited:
Dismissal, demotion, reassignment, or harassment in response to reporting is illegal.
Good Faith Reporting:
Protection applies if disclosure is made honestly and with reasonable belief that misconduct exists.
Compensation and Remedies:
Courts often award financial compensation, reinstatement, and policy reforms.
Channels of Reporting:
Internal (employer) or external (regulators, authorities) reporting is protected.
Conclusion
Finland’s whistleblower protection framework is comprehensive and robust, aiming to:
Encourage reporting of wrongdoing.
Prevent retaliation and safeguard employees’ rights.
Strengthen corporate, public sector, and societal integrity.
Key takeaway: Finnish law ensures that whistleblowers can report misconduct without fear, and violators face legal liability including reinstatement orders, compensation, and fines.
RELATED Blog
0 comments