Precious Metals Fraud Prosecutions
1. United States v. Barry Minkow – ZZZZ Best / Gold Fraud (U.S., 1988–1989)
Summary:
Barry Minkow orchestrated one of the most famous investment frauds in the 1980s. While primarily known for carpet-cleaning company fraud, his schemes included selling gold-backed investments and bullion to investors that did not exist.
Prosecution:
Charged with mail fraud, wire fraud, and securities fraud.
Investigators documented fake gold invoices and phony contracts for non-existent bullion.
Outcome:
Minkow was sentenced to 25 years in federal prison (served 7.5 years initially).
Ordered to pay $26 million in restitution to defrauded investors.
Relevance:
Shows how precious metals are used to lend credibility to fraudulent investment schemes.
2. United States v. Scott W. Rothstein (U.S., 2009)
Summary:
Rothstein ran a Ponzi-like scheme promising high returns backed by precious metals, including gold bars and coins. Investors were told their funds were secured by bullion that did not exist.
Prosecution:
Charged with mail fraud, wire fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy.
Investigators traced the misappropriation of investor funds and falsified bullion storage records.
Outcome:
Rothstein sentenced to 50 years in federal prison.
Restitution over $1.2 billion to victims.
Relevance:
Highlights the use of physical assets like gold to lure investors into fraudulent schemes.
3. United States v. J. David Kaplan (U.S., 2012)
Summary:
Kaplan ran a precious metals investment scheme, claiming to buy and store gold and silver for investors, but diverted funds for personal use.
Prosecution:
Charged with wire fraud, mail fraud, and investment adviser fraud.
Victims included both individual and institutional investors.
Outcome:
Kaplan sentenced to 12 years in federal prison.
Ordered to repay $15 million in restitution.
Relevance:
Shows that fraudulent precious metals schemes can involve both private investors and larger institutional clients.
4. United States v. Russell Cline (U.S., 2010)
Summary:
Cline ran a gold and silver investment scam under the guise of a legitimate bullion trading company. Investors were promised guaranteed returns and physical delivery of precious metals that were never provided.
Prosecution:
Charged with mail fraud, wire fraud, and securities fraud.
Investigators found fake storage documents and falsified shipping receipts.
Outcome:
Cline sentenced to 8 years in federal prison.
Restitution of over $9 million ordered to victims.
Relevance:
Highlights the combination of false documentation and misrepresentation in precious metals scams.
5. United States v. Barry Tannenbaum (U.S., 2014)
Summary:
Tannenbaum orchestrated a precious metals investment scheme selling gold coins and bars with falsified certificates and false assurances of physical storage.
Prosecution:
Charged with wire fraud, mail fraud, and conspiracy.
FBI investigation traced funds that were diverted to personal accounts rather than bullion purchases.
Outcome:
Sentenced to 10 years in federal prison.
Restitution of over $12 million required.
Relevance:
Demonstrates the importance of verifying physical storage and certificates in precious metals investments.
6. United States v. Thomas Petters (U.S., 2009)
Summary:
Petters ran a massive Ponzi scheme that included fake precious metals investments. Investors were told they were buying gold and silver contracts secured by physical assets that did not exist.
Prosecution:
Charged with mail fraud, wire fraud, securities fraud, and money laundering.
Investigation revealed billions of dollars misappropriated from investors.
Outcome:
Sentenced to 50 years in federal prison.
Ordered to pay $3.65 billion in restitution.
Relevance:
One of the largest precious metals-related frauds in U.S. history.
7. United States v. Liberty Reserve Precious Metals (U.S., 2013)
Summary:
Liberty Reserve promoted investments in gold and other metals, claiming secure storage and guaranteed returns. Investigation revealed that the company never purchased the metals and diverted investor funds to pay early investors.
Prosecution:
Charged with wire fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy.
Coordination with international law enforcement was critical due to cross-border operations.
Outcome:
Company executives sentenced to 5–12 years in federal prison.
Millions of dollars in investor funds were recovered and returned.
Relevance:
Shows that fraudulent precious metals schemes often operate internationally.
Key Legal Principles in Precious Metals Fraud
Applicable U.S. Laws:
Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343): Using electronic communications to defraud investors.
Mail Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341): Using postal services in the fraud scheme.
Securities Fraud (15 U.S.C. § 78j): Misrepresentation of investment-backed assets.
Investment Adviser Fraud (15 U.S.C. § 80b-6): Misusing investor funds for personal gain.
Common Methods of Fraud:
Selling non-existent bullion or metals contracts.
Providing falsified certificates of authenticity or storage.
Ponzi-like structures using new investors’ money to pay returns.
Consequences:
Federal prison sentences typically 8–50 years, depending on the scale.
Mandatory restitution to investors.
Forfeiture of misappropriated assets.
Trends:
Fraudsters often exploit gold and silver’s perceived stability to lure investors.
International coordination is sometimes required due to cross-border sales.
Verification of physical assets is a critical preventative measure for investors.
RELATED Blog
0 comments