Digital Evidence In Criminal Investigations
Digital Evidence in Criminal Investigations
Definition:
Digital evidence, also known as electronic evidence, refers to any data stored or transmitted in digital form that can be used in legal proceedings. This includes emails, computer files, social media activity, mobile phone records, GPS data, CCTV footage, cloud storage data, and blockchain transactions.
Importance in Criminal Investigations:
Authentication & Integrity: Digital evidence must be authentic and unaltered. Techniques like hashing, digital signatures, and forensic imaging ensure integrity.
Types:
Computer-based evidence (hard drives, USBs, laptops)
Mobile-based evidence (call logs, SMS, app data)
Network-based evidence (IP addresses, emails, server logs)
Multimedia evidence (videos, images, voice recordings)
Challenges:
Encryption and password protection
Cloud and cross-border data access issues
Volatility (data can be deleted or altered easily)
Legal Framework (India): Sections 65A and 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and provisions in the Information Technology Act, 2000 regulate the admissibility of digital evidence.
Case Laws on Digital Evidence
1. State of Tamil Nadu v. Suhas Katti (2004)
Facts: The accused sent obscene emails to the victim and posted defamatory content online.
Digital Evidence: Emails and website postings were used as evidence.
Judgment: The court relied on the authenticity of digital messages. This case highlighted that emails could be admissible under the Indian Evidence Act with proper certification under Section 65B.
Significance: First major Indian case where internet/email evidence was central to conviction.
2. Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2018)
Facts: The accused challenged the admissibility of digitally stored evidence in a murder investigation.
Digital Evidence: Call records and mobile location data.
Judgment: Supreme Court held that electronic evidence is valid if the proper procedure of Section 65B certification is followed.
Significance: Reinforced the principle that un-certified digital records are inadmissible.
3. Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer (2014)
Facts: Dispute over the admissibility of evidence from a computer hard disk.
Digital Evidence: Emails and downloaded documents.
Judgment: Supreme Court clarified that all electronic evidence requires certification under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act to be admissible.
Significance: Landmark clarification on authentication requirements for digital evidence.
4. State v. Mohd. Ajmal Amir Kasab (2012) – 26/11 Mumbai Attack Case
Facts: Terror attack involving digital communication between handlers abroad and attackers in Mumbai.
Digital Evidence: Mobile call records, GPS data, and intercepted emails.
Judgment: Digital evidence was crucial in linking attackers to handlers and coordinating the prosecution.
Significance: Showed the importance of electronic evidence in terrorism-related criminal investigations.
5. Gaurav Sachdeva v. State of Punjab (2017)
Facts: Cybercrime involving identity theft and online impersonation.
Digital Evidence: Social media profiles, chat logs, and IP address tracking.
Judgment: The court accepted digital data from social media platforms as admissible evidence after verifying authenticity and source.
Significance: Recognized social media data as critical digital evidence for criminal investigations.
6. State of Maharashtra v. Praful Desai (2003)
Facts: Medical negligence case involving digital X-rays and patient records.
Digital Evidence: Scanned X-rays and computer-stored patient data.
Judgment: Court held that properly maintained electronic records are admissible under Section 65B.
Significance: Expanded digital evidence beyond cybercrime into civil and criminal disputes.
7. K. Narayana Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2010)
Facts: Murder case where evidence was found on a mobile phone and CCTV footage.
Digital Evidence: Mobile SMS and CCTV videos.
Judgment: Court accepted digital media evidence after proper forensic verification.
Significance: Emphasized chain-of-custody and forensic validation for admissibility.
Key Takeaways from These Cases
Certification is crucial: Most Indian cases emphasize Section 65B compliance.
Forensic validation: Courts require proof of authenticity, integrity, and proper chain-of-custody.
Broad scope: Digital evidence is no longer limited to cybercrime; it is relevant in murder, terrorism, civil disputes, and medical negligence.
Social media & cloud evidence: Increasingly used to trace criminal activity.
Global relevance: Digital evidence can transcend borders, necessitating international cooperation.
RELATED Blog
0 comments