Rights Of Accused During Arrest
🔷 I. Rights of the Accused During Arrest: Overview
When a person is arrested, they have constitutional and statutory rights designed to protect their liberty and ensure fair treatment. These rights aim to prevent abuse and safeguard due process.
Key Rights Include:
Right to be informed of the grounds of arrest (Section 50 CrPC)
Right to be produced before Magistrate within 24 hours (Article 22(2), CrPC Section 57)
Right to legal counsel (Article 22(1), Section 41D CrPC)
Right against self-incrimination (Article 20(3))
Right to humane treatment (Article 21)
Right to be informed of bail eligibility
🔷 II. Important Case Laws Explaining Rights During Arrest
1. DK Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997) 1 SCC 416
Facts:
There were numerous complaints of custodial torture and deaths in police custody.
Held:
Supreme Court laid down 11 mandatory guidelines police must follow during arrest and detention to protect human rights.
These include: informing reasons of arrest, allowing lawyer and family to be informed, medical examination, and maintaining arrest memo.
Significance:
Landmark ruling protecting accused from custodial torture and arbitrary arrest.
These guidelines are now mandatory and have been adopted nationwide.
2. Joginder Kumar v. State of UP (1994) 4 SCC 260
Facts:
Accused was arrested without proper procedure; alleged illegal detention.
Held:
Court emphasized the right of an arrested person to be informed about grounds of arrest and to be produced before magistrate without delay.
Arrest should not be made arbitrarily or as a tool of harassment.
Significance:
Arrest must be reasonable and justified.
Courts can intervene to protect accused from illegal arrest.
3. Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1979) 3 SCC 532
Facts:
Large number of undertrial prisoners detained for long periods without trial.
Held:
Court declared the right to speedy trial as part of fundamental rights under Article 21.
Highlighted that unlawful arrest and prolonged detention violate constitutional rights.
Significance:
Reinforces right against illegal detention post-arrest.
4. Nandini Sathpathy v. P.L. Dani (1978) 2 SCC 424
Facts:
Accused claimed right against self-incrimination during police interrogation.
Held:
Supreme Court held that accused cannot be compelled to answer questions that may incriminate them.
Right under Article 20(3) is absolute and cannot be violated.
Significance:
Protects accused from forced confessions and custodial pressure.
5. Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273
Facts:
Frequent arrests under Section 498A IPC (dowry harassment) without proper verification.
Held:
Supreme Court issued strict guidelines restricting unnecessary arrests.
Arrest should only be made if necessary and justified after due inquiry.
Magistrate must ensure reasons for detention.
Significance:
Protects accused from automatic arrest in cases where investigation can proceed without custody.
6. State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992) Supp (1) SCC 335
Facts:
Excessive use of arrest powers as political or personal vendetta.
Held:
Supreme Court listed categories of cases where arrests should not be made arbitrarily.
Arrest must be based on valid reasons and evidence.
Significance:
Helps limit abuse of arrest powers.
🔷 III. Summary of Rights and Judicial Safeguards
| Right | Description | Case Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Inform Grounds of Arrest | Police must clearly inform reason of arrest | DK Basu |
| Right to Lawyer | Accused can consult lawyer at all times | DK Basu, Joginder Kumar |
| Right to be Produced in 24 Hrs | Accused must be produced before magistrate | Article 22(2), DK Basu |
| Protection Against Self-Incrimination | Cannot be forced to confess | Nandini Sathpathy |
| Protection from Illegal/Unnecessary Arrest | Arrest only when justified, not for harassment | Arnesh Kumar, Bhajan Lal |
| Humane Treatment | No torture or cruel treatment | DK Basu |
🔷 IV. Why These Rights Matter
Prevent police excesses and custodial torture.
Safeguard the accused's constitutional guarantees.
Ensure a fair trial by upholding dignity and legal processes.
Protect public trust in the criminal justice system.
RELATED Blog
0 comments