Landmark Judgments On Custodial Rape
1. D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997) – India
Facts:
This case involved several instances of custodial deaths and torture, with reports also highlighting sexual abuse of women in custody. The petitioner sought safeguards to prevent custodial violence and abuse.
Issue:
What procedural safeguards and remedies should be implemented to protect individuals, especially women, from custodial violence including custodial rape?
Holding:
The Supreme Court laid down detailed guidelines to be followed during arrest and detention to prevent custodial torture and sexual abuse. These include mandatory medical examination, informing family members, and ensuring presence of a police officer during interrogation.
Significance:
Though the case broadly dealt with custodial torture, it is foundational in addressing custodial rape by emphasizing preventive mechanisms. It recognized custodial rape as a severe violation of human rights requiring strict safeguards and accountability.
2. Prakash Kadam v. Ramprasad Vishwanath Gupta (2018) – India
Facts:
A woman accused police officers of custodial rape during her detention. The accused officers claimed the sexual encounter was consensual.
Issue:
How should courts treat allegations of custodial rape where the defense claims consent, and what evidentiary standards apply?
Holding:
The Supreme Court held that in cases of custodial rape, the burden shifts to the accused to prove consent. Given the inherent power imbalance, courts should be extremely cautious about accepting claims of consent in custodial situations.
Significance:
This ruling reinforced the principle that custodial rape is a grave abuse of power and consent is almost never a valid defense due to the coercive environment. It enhanced victim protection and accountability in custodial rape cases.
3. State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996) – India
Facts:
This case involved custodial violence where a detainee was sexually assaulted by police officers.
Issue:
What are the consequences and liabilities for custodial officials found guilty of custodial rape?
Holding:
The Supreme Court ruled that custodial rape amounts to a violation of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Indian Constitution. The court emphasized strict criminal liability and compensation to victims.
Significance:
The case is landmark in holding custodial officers criminally responsible for custodial rape, affirming victims’ rights to justice and compensation, and highlighting the state’s duty to prevent abuse in custody.
4. NHRC Guidelines on Custodial Rape (2013) – India
Facts:
Following numerous cases of custodial rape and sexual abuse in police custody, the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) issued detailed guidelines to be followed by law enforcement agencies.
Issue:
What procedural and preventive measures should be adopted to eradicate custodial rape?
Guidelines:
Immediate medical examination of female detainees by a woman doctor.
Mandatory filing of FIRs and proper investigation.
Videotaping of interrogations.
Prompt registration of complaints against custodial officials.
Compensation and rehabilitation measures for victims.
Significance:
Though not a court judgment, these guidelines have been upheld by courts and are critical in framing judicial approaches to custodial rape, reinforcing victim protection and police accountability.
5. Shatrughan Chauhan v. Union of India (2014) – India
Facts:
This case dealt with custodial deaths and abuse, including sexual violence in detention centers.
Issue:
What systemic reforms are necessary to prevent custodial violence including custodial rape?
Holding:
The Supreme Court issued strong directives to state governments to implement stringent monitoring mechanisms, compensation schemes, and accountability for custodial abuse, including rape.
Significance:
The judgment is significant in reinforcing the state’s positive obligations to prevent custodial rape and uphold human dignity under Article 21.
Summary:
These judgments collectively underscore the severity of custodial rape as a violation of human rights and constitutional guarantees. The courts have consistently emphasized:
The power imbalance in custody undermines the notion of consent.
Strict procedural safeguards and monitoring to prevent abuse.
Criminal accountability for perpetrators.
Compensation and rehabilitation for victims.
RELATED Blog
0 comments