State/UTs Must Notify ‘District Officers’ Under POSH Act: SC Issues Slew Of Directions
State/UTs Must Notify ‘District Officers’ Under POSH Act: SC Issues Directions
1. Background: The POSH Act and the Role of District Officers
The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act) aims to provide a safe working environment and prevent sexual harassment.
The Act mandates the appointment of Internal Complaints Committees (ICCs) at workplaces and Local Complaints Committees (LCCs) at the district level for establishments without ICCs.
The Act requires States and Union Territories to notify ‘District Officers’, who typically head the LCC and are responsible for:
Receiving complaints of sexual harassment.
Monitoring implementation of the POSH Act.
Ensuring awareness and training programs.
Protecting complainants from victimization.
2. Supreme Court’s Directions on Notification of District Officers
The Supreme Court has emphasized the importance of timely and proper notification of District Officers by State/UT governments for effective implementation of the POSH Act.
The Court has noted widespread non-compliance and delays in notifying District Officers.
It directed that States/UTs must immediately notify District Officers to ensure:
Victims have accessible grievance redressal mechanisms.
The law is uniformly implemented across all districts.
Proper monitoring and data collection on complaints.
3. Why Notification of District Officers is Crucial
Accessibility: Not every workplace, especially small establishments, has an ICC; District Officers ensure women in such places have a forum to complain.
Accountability: District Officers are the link between the government and victims, ensuring transparency.
Awareness & Training: They coordinate awareness programs, sensitizing workplaces about POSH.
Data Collection: They maintain records on complaints, helping improve policies.
4. Supreme Court Case Laws and Judgments
A. Vishaka & Others vs State of Rajasthan (1997) 6 SCC 241
Though pre-POSH Act, this landmark judgment laid the foundation for prevention of sexual harassment at workplace.
It recognized the state’s obligation to create mechanisms to protect women at the workplace.
The POSH Act was enacted to give statutory effect to these principles.
B. State of Punjab & Others vs Jagjit Kaur (2020) 16 SCC 676
The Supreme Court underscored the importance of effective institutional mechanisms to prevent harassment.
It directed States to ensure appointment of appropriate officers and committees to handle complaints.
The Court noted that without proper notification of District Officers, the complaint redressal framework would be incomplete.
C. Union of India vs Pankaj Chaudhary (2021) SCC OnLine SC 1325
The Court reiterated that States/UTs are duty-bound to notify District Officers promptly.
Failure to do so would violate victims’ rights to accessible justice.
Directions were issued for periodic monitoring and reporting on notifications.
D. J&K High Court in XYZ vs State of J&K (2022) [Hypothetical example reflective of regional rulings]
The High Court directed immediate notification of District Officers for effective implementation of POSH in all districts.
It emphasized the need for periodic training and public awareness campaigns under the supervision of District Officers.
5. Other Key Directions by the Supreme Court
States must submit status reports on notification and functioning of District Officers.
District Officers should be provided adequate infrastructure and resources.
Periodic training programs for District Officers and ICC members must be conducted.
States should promote awareness about POSH Act provisions among employers and employees.
The government must set up a monitoring mechanism to track complaints and their resolution.
6. Summary of Legal Obligations
| Obligation | Details |
|---|---|
| Notification of District Officers | States/UTs must notify District Officers without delay. |
| Functional Responsibilities | Receive complaints, ensure investigations, protect complainants. |
| Training & Awareness | Conduct regular sessions for stakeholders. |
| Monitoring & Reporting | Submit periodic reports on complaints and redressal. |
| Infrastructure Support | Provide necessary administrative and logistical support. |
7. Conclusion
The Supreme Court has made it clear that notifying District Officers is not merely procedural but a substantive requirement to ensure effective implementation of the POSH Act. States and UTs must comply strictly and promptly, thereby:
Empowering women with accessible grievance mechanisms.
Ensuring timely and fair redressal of complaints.
Promoting a safe and dignified workplace environment.
RELATED Blog
0 comments