Charter School Fraud Prosecutions

Overview

Charter schools are publicly funded independent schools that operate under a charter or contract. While they are meant to innovate and improve education, unfortunately, some charter schools or their operators engage in fraudulent activities to improperly obtain public funds or misrepresent their operations.

Common Types of Fraud in Charter Schools

Misappropriation or embezzlement of public funds

Falsifying attendance records or enrollment numbers to increase funding

Kickbacks and bribery in procurement or contracts

False billing for services not rendered

Inflated or fabricated financial reports

Conflicts of interest and self-dealing

Federal and State Laws Used in Prosecutions

18 U.S.C. § 1341 – Mail Fraud

18 U.S.C. § 1343 – Wire Fraud

18 U.S.C. § 666 – Theft or Bribery Concerning Programs Receiving Federal Funds

20 U.S.C. § 1232g – Protection of Student Records (FERPA violations in fraud schemes)

State fraud and embezzlement statutes

False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. §§ 3729–3733) in cases involving false billing to federal programs

Case Law: Detailed Analysis of Charter School Fraud Prosecutions

1. United States v. Brian Maher (2019)

Facts:

Maher, the founder of a charter school management company, was accused of embezzling millions of dollars from charter schools he managed.

Charges:

Mail and wire fraud

Theft of government funds

Outcome:

Convicted on multiple counts, sentenced to over 10 years in federal prison.

Significance:

One of the largest charter school fraud prosecutions highlighting abuse by management companies.

2. People v. Romero (California, 2016)

Facts:

Romero was a charter school CEO charged with falsifying attendance records to inflate state funding.

Charges:

Fraudulent claims against the state

Falsifying documents

Outcome:

Convicted, ordered to repay millions, sentenced to prison.

Importance:

Demonstrated that falsifying enrollment data to increase funding can lead to criminal prosecution.

3. United States v. Abundant Life Ministries Academy (2015)

Facts:

Operators of a charter school engaged in fraudulent billing for special education services never provided.

Charges:

Health care fraud

False claims

Outcome:

Operators pled guilty, ordered to pay restitution and serve prison sentences.

Significance:

Showed intersection of education fraud and healthcare fraud in charter schools.

4. State of New York v. Innovate Charter School (2018)

Facts:

The school was investigated for kickbacks and bribery related to contracts with vendors.

Charges:

Bribery

Fraudulent procurement

Outcome:

School officials convicted, fined, and barred from managing future schools.

Importance:

Illustrates corruption risks in charter school contracting.

5. United States v. James C. Mitchell (2017)

Facts:

Mitchell was accused of embezzling federal grant money intended for charter school technology upgrades.

Charges:

Theft of federal funds

Wire fraud

Outcome:

Convicted, sentenced to prison and restitution.

Significance:

Highlights federal crackdown on misuse of grant money.

6. People v. Green Charter School (Illinois, 2020)

Facts:

School administrators submitted false documents to receive extra state funds.

Charges:

Fraud

Forgery

Outcome:

Convictions secured; schools ordered to repay funds.

Importance:

Demonstrates states’ active role in prosecuting charter fraud.

Summary Table of Cases

CaseYearDefendantsChargesOutcomeSignificance
United States v. Brian Maher2019Brian MaherMail/Wire fraud, theft of fundsConvicted, 10+ years prisonLarge-scale charter management fraud
People v. Romero (CA)2016RomeroFalsifying attendanceConvicted, prison, restitutionFraudulent enrollment for funding
U.S. v. Abundant Life Ministries2015Charter operatorsHealth care fraud, false claimsGuilty pleas, restitutionFraudulent billing for services
NY v. Innovate Charter School2018School officialsBribery, procurement fraudConvicted, fines, barredCorruption in vendor contracts
United States v. James C. Mitchell2017James C. MitchellTheft of federal funds, wire fraudConvicted, prison, restitutionMisuse of federal grant money
People v. Green Charter School (IL)2020School administratorsFraud, forgeryConvicted, fund repaymentFalse documents for state funding

Conclusion

Charter school fraud prosecutions are increasing as federal and state authorities target the misuse of public funds and corruption in this growing sector. These prosecutions focus on:

Misappropriation of funds

Falsification of enrollment and billing data

Bribery and kickbacks

Fraudulent grant spending

The cases show how prosecutors use a variety of criminal statutes, from mail and wire fraud to theft of federal funds, to hold offenders accountable.

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments