Construction Site Fatality Prosecutions
Overview
Construction site fatalities often arise from unsafe practices, lack of proper safety measures, negligence, or violation of occupational safety laws. Prosecutions in such cases usually involve criminal liability under Occupational Safety and Health laws, Negligence, or Reckless Endangerment, depending on the jurisdiction. Employers, contractors, or individual supervisors can be held liable.
Case Studies
1. R v. Shropshire Council & Contractor (UK, 2007)
Facts:
A construction worker fell from scaffolding at a municipal building site. The scaffolding lacked proper guardrails, and the safety inspection reports were falsified.
Legal Issue:
Whether the council and contracted company breached duties under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.
Outcome:
Both the council and the contractor were found guilty. Fines exceeded £300,000, and the contractor received additional remedial orders to improve safety procedures.
Significance:
Reinforced that both principal employers and subcontractors share joint responsibility for worker safety.
2. United States v. Fluor Enterprises (USA, 2010)
Facts:
A worker died in a trench collapse on a construction site. OSHA investigations found that trench safety regulations (e.g., shoring) were ignored, and safety training was insufficient.
Legal Issue:
Violation of OSHA Standards 29 CFR Part 1926 related to excavation and trenching.
Outcome:
Fluor Enterprises was fined $1.1 million. Criminal charges were brought against site managers for willful violation of safety laws leading to death. Managers were sentenced to probation and mandatory safety training programs.
Significance:
Showed that corporate entities can face both civil fines and criminal liability when negligence leads to fatalities.
3. R v. Carillion Construction Ltd (UK, 2013)
Facts:
During a high-rise project, a worker was fatally crushed by falling scaffolding equipment. Investigations revealed poor risk assessments and insufficient training.
Legal Issue:
Breach of duty under the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007.
Outcome:
Carillion was convicted of corporate manslaughter and fined £2.2 million. The verdict stressed accountability of corporate boards for systemic safety failures.
Significance:
Illustrates the use of corporate homicide legislation to hold companies liable for fatal construction accidents.
4. United States v. Bechtel Corp (USA, 2015)
Facts:
A worker died after a scaffold collapsed during a bridge construction project. OSHA cited multiple violations, including failure to provide fall protection and improper scaffold erection.
Legal Issue:
Willful violation of OSHA safety standards causing death.
Outcome:
Bechtel agreed to pay $1.3 million in penalties and implement a company-wide safety compliance program. Two site supervisors were charged criminally and given probation.
Significance:
Highlighted that management-level negligence in enforcing safety procedures could lead to criminal prosecution.
5. R v. Balfour Beatty Construction (UK, 2018)
Facts:
A worker was electrocuted on a site due to exposed live wires. Site risk assessments were incomplete, and safety signs were absent.
Legal Issue:
Breach of Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and duty of care toward employees.
Outcome:
Balfour Beatty was fined £1.5 million. Senior managers were reprimanded but not jailed. The court stressed systemic failures in safety culture rather than individual error.
Significance:
Emphasized the importance of proactive safety culture over mere compliance paperwork.
6. R v. Vinci Construction (UK, 2020)
Facts:
A construction worker fell through an unguarded roof opening. Despite multiple warnings, the company had failed to install temporary fall protections.
Legal Issue:
Corporate manslaughter and breach of workplace safety duties.
Outcome:
Vinci Construction was fined £3 million, and safety officers were mandated to attend compliance programs.
Significance:
Showed courts imposing significant financial penalties for avoidable fatalities, reinforcing employer accountability.
7. United States v. Kiewit Corporation (USA, 2017)
Facts:
A crane operator died when the crane tipped due to poor load assessment and inadequate ground support. OSHA found multiple violations.
Legal Issue:
Violation of OSHA 29 CFR Part 1926 and criminal negligence.
Outcome:
Kiewit paid $2 million in fines. Two supervisors faced misdemeanor charges for failing to provide proper training.
Significance:
Highlighted that fatalities caused by unsafe equipment handling could result in both corporate and individual liability.
Key Takeaways From These Cases
Shared Responsibility: Liability can extend to contractors, subcontractors, and corporate executives.
Corporate Manslaughter Laws: UK law allows holding corporations accountable for systemic failures.
Criminal and Civil Penalties: Companies can face fines, criminal charges, and mandated safety reforms.
Importance of Compliance: Proper safety training, risk assessment, and protective equipment are essential.
Precedent for Safety Culture: Courts are increasingly emphasizing proactive safety culture over minimal legal compliance.
RELATED Blog
0 comments