Underage Dui Prosecutions
🔍 What is Underage DUI?
Underage DUI involves:
A person under the legal drinking age (usually 21 in the U.S.) operating a vehicle while impaired by alcohol or drugs.
Many states have zero tolerance laws: any detectable amount of alcohol in a minor’s system while driving can lead to prosecution.
Unlike adult DUI laws, these often focus on any measurable blood alcohol content (BAC) over zero or very low limits (e.g., 0.02%).
Key Legal Issues:
Strict liability for any alcohol use: No need to prove impairment in some states.
Additional penalties for minors: License suspension, fines, mandatory education, community service.
Zero tolerance policies aim to deter underage drinking and driving.
Different from adult DUI laws which generally require BAC over 0.08% and proof of impairment.
Case Law (Detailed Analysis)
1. People v. Collins, 1989 (California)
Facts: Collins, 19, was arrested for driving with a BAC of 0.02%. He argued this was too low to impair driving.
Ruling: The court upheld conviction under California’s zero tolerance law for underage drivers, emphasizing public safety over impairment proof.
Significance: Confirms zero tolerance policy that any measurable alcohol level can result in conviction for underage drivers.
2. In re Brandon T., 1997 (New York)
Facts: Brandon, 17, was charged with DUI after being stopped with a BAC of 0.01%.
Ruling: The juvenile court found that even minimal alcohol in underage drivers violates zero tolerance laws and affirmed disciplinary measures.
Significance: Shows juvenile courts apply strict zero tolerance rules in underage DUI cases.
3. State v. James, 2012 (Ohio)
Facts: James, age 20, was arrested for DUI with a BAC of 0.04%, under Ohio’s zero tolerance law for those under 21.
Ruling: The court affirmed conviction and license suspension despite no apparent impairment.
Significance: Demonstrates enforcement of lower BAC limits for underage DUI and non-requirement of impairment proof.
4. People v. Hernandez, 2015 (Illinois)
Facts: Hernandez, age 17, challenged his DUI conviction arguing the breathalyzer results were unreliable.
Ruling: The court rejected the challenge, holding that breathalyzer evidence is sufficient for conviction in underage DUI cases.
Significance: Confirms the use of chemical testing as primary evidence in underage DUI prosecutions.
5. State v. Allen, 2018 (Texas)
Facts: Allen, 19, was charged with underage DUI and argued that the statute violated his due process rights by criminalizing very low BAC.
Ruling: The court upheld the law, stating protecting public safety justified strict enforcement.
Significance: Reinforces the constitutionality of zero tolerance underage DUI laws.
6. In re A.J., 2020 (Florida)
Facts: A 16-year-old juvenile was charged with DUI after a traffic stop revealed a BAC of 0.015%.
Ruling: The juvenile court ordered license suspension, community service, and mandatory education, emphasizing rehabilitation.
Significance: Shows juvenile courts focus on corrective measures alongside prosecution.
Summary of Legal Principles
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Zero tolerance laws apply to underage DUI | Any BAC above zero or minimal levels leads to prosecution. |
| Proof of impairment not always required | Chemical test results often suffice. |
| Penalties focus on deterrence and rehabilitation | License suspension, education, fines common. |
| Juvenile courts balance punishment with corrective goals | Rehabilitation is emphasized for minors. |
| Constitutionality of strict laws upheld | Courts prioritize public safety over due process challenges. |
Typical Penalties for Underage DUI:
License suspension or revocation (often 6 months or more),
Fines (vary widely),
Mandatory alcohol education or treatment programs,
Community service,
Possible juvenile detention in severe cases.
RELATED Blog
0 comments