Default Bail And Constitutional Safeguards
What is Default Bail?
Default Bail (sometimes called "statutory bail") is a right granted to an accused who has been detained in custody for a prolonged period without the filing of a charge-sheet or completion of investigation within the time prescribed by law. This right arises primarily under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973.
Legal Basis of Default Bail
Section 167(2) CrPC: If the investigation or inquiry is not completed within 15 days (or 30 days in case of serious offences punishable with death, life imprisonment, or imprisonment for 10 years or more), the accused shall be released on bail, if they are otherwise eligible.
The principle behind default bail is to prevent unlawful and indefinite detention of accused persons before trial.
Constitutional Safeguards Related to Default Bail
Article 21 of the Constitution of India: Guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, which includes the right not to be unlawfully detained.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that prolonged detention without trial violates Article 21, and default bail is an essential safeguard to uphold this right.
The right to speedy trial is an integral part of Article 21.
Important Case Laws on Default Bail and Constitutional Safeguards
1. Hussainara Khatoon & Ors. v. State of Bihar (1979) — AIR 1979 SC 1369
Facts: This is a landmark case where the Supreme Court addressed the plight of undertrial prisoners languishing in jail without trial for long periods.
Held: The Court held that the right to personal liberty under Article 21 is violated when a person is detained without being charged or tried within the statutory period. It emphasized that Section 167(2) CrPC provides a right to default bail and prolonged detention is unconstitutional.
Significance: Established the fundamental principle of the right to speedy trial and default bail as a constitutional safeguard.
2. Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab (1980) — AIR 1980 SC 150
Facts: The case challenged extended remand and detention of accused without adequate justification.
Held: The Court stressed that default bail is a mandatory right under Section 167(2) CrPC if investigation is not complete within time. Further, the Court held that courts cannot grant indefinite remand to avoid default bail.
Significance: Clarified that default bail cannot be denied on flimsy grounds and the accused’s liberty must be respected.
3. State of Rajasthan v. Balchand (1977) — AIR 1977 SC 2447
Facts: The accused was denied bail despite the prosecution failing to file charge-sheet within time.
Held: The Supreme Court held that once the prescribed time period expires, the accused has a right to be released on bail as a matter of right, not discretion.
Significance: Affirmed that default bail is mandatory and is not subject to judicial discretion once conditions are met.
4. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) — AIR 1978 SC 597
Facts: Though the case dealt primarily with the right to travel, the Supreme Court broadened the interpretation of Article 21.
Held: The Court held that any law or action restricting personal liberty must be just, fair, and reasonable. This judgment strengthened the constitutional protection to personal liberty including the right against unlawful detention.
Significance: Reinforced constitutional safeguards that underpin the right to default bail.
5. Niranjan Singh v. Prabhakar Rajaram Kharote (1985) — AIR 1985 SC 628
Facts: The petitioner was detained without chargesheet and denied bail.
Held: The Supreme Court reiterated that Section 167(2) CrPC imposes a statutory duty to release accused on bail if investigation is not completed within the prescribed time. The court stated that the liberty of a citizen cannot be curtailed without due process.
Significance: Reasserted the mandatory nature of default bail as a constitutional safeguard.
Summary of Legal Principles
| Legal Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Right to Default Bail | Accused must be granted bail if charge-sheet is not filed within 15/30 days under Section 167(2) CrPC. |
| Fundamental Right under Article 21 | Prolonged detention without trial violates the right to life and personal liberty. |
| Mandatory Nature of Default Bail | Once conditions are met, bail cannot be denied on discretionary grounds. |
| Speedy Trial is a Constitutional Right | Trial must be completed promptly to avoid violation of liberty rights. |
| Judicial Custody and Remand Strictly Regulated | Remand cannot be extended to avoid default bail. |
Conclusion
Default bail is a crucial safeguard against arbitrary and prolonged detention of accused persons before trial. The constitutional guarantee of personal liberty under Article 21, combined with statutory provisions like Section 167(2) CrPC, ensures that accused are not kept indefinitely in custody without a timely investigation and trial. Courts have consistently reinforced this right to protect individuals from abuse of power and uphold justice.
RELATED Blog
0 comments