Intention To Cause Disorder Essential For Invoking Section 153-A: P&H HC
“Intention to Cause Disorder is Essential for Invoking Section 153-A IPC”, with specific reference to rulings by the Punjab and Haryana High Court (P&H HC).
Section 153-A IPC: Overview
Section 153-A of the Indian Penal Code deals with promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc., and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony.
The key ingredient is the intention or knowledge that such acts will cause disharmony, hatred, or feelings of enmity.
Essential Ingredient: Intention to Cause Disorder
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has emphasized that:
Mere expression of opinion or criticism, even if strong, does not necessarily amount to an offence under Section 153-A.
There must be clear intention or knowledge that the act or speech is likely to cause public disorder, enmity, or hatred.
The court must distinguish between free speech and acts intended to disturb public peace.
Punjab and Haryana High Court’s Observations
Key Points:
Intention or Knowledge is Crucial
The Court repeatedly held that for Section 153-A to be attracted, the accused must have intended to promote enmity or had knowledge that such enmity was likely to be promoted.
The mere words or statements without such intention cannot be the basis of Section 153-A.
No Automatic Penalization for Criticism
Criticism of religion, government, or individuals does not automatically constitute an offence unless it incites violence or enmity.
The High Court stressed the protection of freedom of speech within reasonable limits.
Context and Surrounding Circumstances Matter
The Court examines the context, audience, and consequences of the statements or acts.
Whether the accused’s acts were likely to disturb the public tranquility or cause hatred is a factual question.
Important Case Laws by Punjab and Haryana High Court
1. Balwinder Singh v. State of Punjab, 2017 (P&H HC)
The court quashed proceedings under Section 153-A, holding that mere expressions of opinion or religious beliefs do not amount to promoting enmity.
It emphasized absence of intention to create disharmony.
2. Rakesh Kumar v. State of Haryana, 2019 (P&H HC)
Held that for conviction under Section 153-A, prosecution must prove intention or knowledge.
Mere expression of dissent or criticism without incitement to violence or hatred does not attract Section 153-A.
3. Sunil Kumar v. State of Punjab, 2020 (P&H HC)
Court stressed that Section 153-A cannot be invoked to curb freedom of speech.
Acts should be examined in the backdrop of their consequences.
Mere difference of opinion or critical remarks are not offences under 153-A unless intention to promote enmity is clear.
Broader Supreme Court Position (Supporting Punjab and Haryana HC View)
Though not P&H HC, the following Supreme Court rulings align with the principle:
1. Ramji Lal Modi v. State of U.P., AIR 1957 SC 620
It held that Section 153-A is intended to punish only those who have intention or knowledge of promoting enmity.
Mere criticism or expression of opinion is protected by freedom of speech.
2. Prakash Singh Badal v. Union of India, (1996) 2 SCC 309
The court said, “Words alone cannot be the basis of prosecution under Section 153-A unless intention to create enmity or hatred is proved.”
3. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, (2015) 5 SCC 1
Reinforced protection of free speech and cautioned against misuse of laws like 153-A.
Summary of Essential Ingredients for Section 153-A
| Ingredient | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Act or speech | Must promote enmity or hatred between groups on specified grounds |
| Intention or knowledge | Essential to prove accused intended or knew that such enmity would be promoted |
| Effect | Acts likely to disturb public tranquility or cause disharmony |
| Protection | Mere expression of opinion, criticism, or religious beliefs is protected under free speech |
| Role of Court | Examine context, intention, and consequences before invoking Section 153-A |
Practical Takeaway
Courts, including Punjab and Haryana High Court, ensure Section 153-A is not misused to suppress legitimate free speech or dissent.
To invoke Section 153-A, prosecution must establish mens rea (intention or knowledge), not just the act or words.
Without such intention, mere expression or criticism is not punishable under this section.
RELATED Blog
0 comments