Gender Identity Crimes Under Transgender Act
🔹 1. Overview of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019
The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 was enacted to protect the rights and dignity of transgender persons in India and provide them equal opportunities in public life. It criminalizes various acts of discrimination, violence, and exploitation based on a person’s gender identity.
🔹 Key Provisions Relating to Gender Identity Crimes
| Section | Offense/Provision | Punishment |
|---|---|---|
| Section 18(a) | Compelling a transgender person to engage in forced or bonded labor | 6 months to 2 years imprisonment + fine |
| Section 18(b) | Denial of use of public places or services | Same as above |
| Section 18(c) | Physical, sexual, verbal, emotional or economic abuse | Same as above |
| Section 3 | Prohibits discrimination in education, employment, healthcare, public services etc. | Civil enforcement and redressal mechanisms |
| Section 19 | National Council to monitor implementation | Advisory but critical in policymaking |
🔹 Understanding Gender Identity Crimes
Gender identity crimes are offenses where the victim is targeted or discriminated against because of their gender identity, specifically as a transgender or non-binary person. These crimes include:
Physical or sexual assault based on gender identity
Harassment in public spaces, schools, or workplaces
Denial of healthcare, education, or employment
Forced conversion therapies
Economic and emotional abuse
Social exclusion and humiliation
⚖️ Key Case Law: Detailed Discussion of Landmark Cases
✅ 1. National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) v. Union of India (2014)
Citation: AIR 2014 SC 1863
Facts:
A PIL was filed by NALSA seeking legal recognition and protection for transgender persons.
Holding:
The Supreme Court declared transgender persons as the ‘third gender’, affirming their fundamental rights under Articles 14, 15, 16, 19, and 21.
Key Observations:
Discrimination on the basis of gender identity is unconstitutional.
Transgender persons have a right to self-identify their gender.
Directed the government to ensure reservations in education and employment.
Impact:
Laid the foundation for the Transgender Act, 2019 and inspired subsequent cases focused on criminal and civil protections for transgender individuals.
✅ 2. Arun Kumar & Sreeja v. Inspector General of Registration (2019)
Court: Madras High Court
Facts:
The petitioner, a cisgender man, married a transgender woman, and authorities refused to register their marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act.
Holding:
The court recognized a transgender woman as a "bride" under the Hindu Marriage Act and upheld the marriage.
Significance:
Affirmed the legal personhood and marital rights of transgender individuals, protecting them from discrimination in civil and legal matters.
✅ 3. X v. State of Uttarakhand (2021)
Court: Uttarakhand High Court
Facts:
A transgender man filed a habeas corpus petition after his partner (a woman) was forcibly taken away by her family due to their relationship.
Holding:
The court ordered that consensual same-gender or transgender relationships are protected under constitutional rights and liberty.
Significance:
Recognized bodily autonomy and choice in relationships regardless of gender identity—important in protecting transgender individuals from family-based violence and confinement.
✅ 4. Humsafar Trust v. Union of India (2019)
Court: Bombay High Court
Facts:
Humsafar Trust challenged the exclusion of transgender persons from certain government schemes and protection mechanisms.
Holding:
The court stressed on inclusive policies and called for special schemes to protect transgender persons from discrimination in health and employment.
Significance:
While not directly criminal, the case emphasized systemic neglect as a form of institutional abuse, pushing the government towards better enforcement of the Transgender Act.
✅ 5. Queen v. The Principal Secretary, Department of Health (2021)
Court: Madras High Court
Facts:
The petitioner, a transgender person, challenged the ban on gender-affirming surgeries and access to hormonal therapy.
Holding:
The court recognized healthcare discrimination as a gender identity crime, directing hospitals to provide inclusive healthcare to transgender persons.
Significance:
Crucial for interpreting denial of healthcare under Section 18(c) as a form of economic and emotional abuse.
✅ 6. Grace Banu v. State of Tamil Nadu (2022)
Court: Madras High Court
Facts:
Grace Banu, a Dalit transgender activist, challenged the double discrimination she faced: one based on caste and the other on gender identity.
Holding:
The court recognized intersectional discrimination, asking the government to frame policies that address multiple layers of marginalization.
Significance:
Strengthened the application of combined protections under the SC/ST Act and the Transgender Act.
⚖️ Legal and Social Challenges in Enforcing the Transgender Act
Despite the law, real-world enforcement remains weak due to:
Lack of awareness among police and judiciary
Reluctance of victims to report due to stigma
Low conviction rates in gender identity crimes
Poor implementation of social welfare schemes
Absence of transgender-friendly public infrastructure (e.g., restrooms, shelters)
🧾 Summary Table of Case Impact
| Case Name | Court | Key Contribution |
|---|---|---|
| NALSA v. Union of India (2014) | Supreme Court | Recognized transgender persons as third gender |
| Arun Kumar v. IG Registration (2019) | Madras HC | Upheld right of transgender women to marry |
| X v. State of Uttarakhand (2021) | Uttarakhand HC | Protected transgender relationship and liberty |
| Humsafar Trust v. UOI (2019) | Bombay HC | Advocated inclusive welfare schemes |
| Queen v. Principal Secy. (2021) | Madras HC | Declared healthcare denial as gender identity abuse |
| Grace Banu v. State of TN (2022) | Madras HC | Recognized intersectionality in discrimination |
✅ Conclusion
Crimes against transgender persons based on their gender identity are not just personal but systemic human rights violations. The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 criminalizes specific acts of abuse and discrimination, but judicial activism through key cases has significantly expanded the scope of protection:
Courts have enforced marital, health, housing, and liberty rights.
Gender identity crimes are now seen in light of constitutional morality, intersectionality, and human dignity.
But real change requires social awareness, police sensitivity, and strong implementation of legal protections.
RELATED Blog
0 comments