Power Of Police To Investigate
Legal Framework
Section 154 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), 1973
Provides the police with the authority to register a First Information Report (FIR) on receiving information about a cognizable offense.
Police must investigate the case unless the complaint is clearly false or frivolous.
Section 156(1) CrPC
Police have the authority to investigate cognizable offenses without prior permission from a magistrate.
The police may also arrest suspects, collect evidence, interrogate witnesses, and file charge sheets.
Section 157 CrPC
In case a cognizable offense is reported in a jurisdiction outside the police station, the police may investigate by transmitting the report to the appropriate station.
Section 160 CrPC
Police can enter any public place to investigate and can summon people for examination.
Section 161 CrPC
Police can examine witnesses and record their statements during investigation.
Limitations:
Police investigation must be conducted within the limits prescribed by law and respecting constitutional rights, including the right against self-incrimination (Article 20(3)) and personal liberty (Article 21).
Key Principles of Police Investigation Power:
Initiation of Investigation: On receiving information of a cognizable offense, police must start investigation without delay.
Search and Seizure: Police can conduct search and seize materials relevant to the offense.
Recording Statements: Police can record statements but cannot coerce or intimidate.
No Arbitrary Power: Police cannot investigate offenses that are non-cognizable without magistrate’s permission.
Supervision by Magistrate: Courts supervise police investigations to prevent abuse.
Investigation is Preliminary: Police investigation does not mean guilt but collection of evidence for magistrate to proceed.
Important Case Laws on Power of Police to Investigate
1. State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992)
Facts:
This landmark judgment dealt with the misuse of police power to investigate politically motivated complaints.
Held:
Supreme Court laid down guidelines to prevent misuse of police investigation, including:
Police cannot start investigation without reasonable basis.
Investigation should not be used as harassment.
Courts should intervene if investigation is mala fide or without proper basis.
Importance:
Set checks and balances on police investigation power, protecting citizens against arbitrary use.
2. Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. (2013)
Facts:
A case highlighting delays and refusals in registering FIRs.
Held:
Supreme Court ruled:
Registration of FIR is mandatory if information discloses cognizable offense.
Police cannot refuse to register FIR.
Once FIR is registered, police must begin investigation immediately.
Importance:
Strengthened the right to have FIR registered and initiate investigation promptly.
3. Bhagwan Singh v. State of Haryana (1975)
Facts:
Accused challenged police investigation alleging bias.
Held:
Court held police have a duty to investigate fairly and must not act arbitrarily or maliciously.
Importance:
Emphasized fairness and objectivity in investigation.
4. Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab (1994)
Facts:
Question of police investigation and arrest in a terrorism case.
Held:
Court ruled police powers of investigation are subject to constitutional safeguards, including protection against unlawful detention and torture.
Importance:
Affirmed that investigation power is not absolute and must comply with constitutional rights.
5. D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997)
Facts:
Focused on safeguards during police investigation and custody.
Held:
Supreme Court laid down detailed guidelines for arrest and detention to prevent custodial violence and abuse during investigation.
Importance:
Protected fundamental rights during investigation phase.
6. Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab (1980)
Facts:
Investigative powers of police under Section 151 CrPC for preventive detention.
Held:
Police powers to arrest without warrant are not arbitrary and subject to judicial scrutiny.
Importance:
Clarified limits of police powers during investigation and preventive actions.
Summary Table
| Case | Key Point on Police Power |
|---|---|
| State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal | Limits on misuse of investigation |
| Lalita Kumari v. U.P. | Mandatory FIR registration and investigation |
| Bhagwan Singh v. Haryana | Fairness in investigation |
| Kartar Singh v. Punjab | Constitutional limits on investigation |
| D.K. Basu v. W.B. | Guidelines for arrest and custody |
| Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia | Judicial control over police powers |
Conclusion
Police have broad powers to investigate cognizable offenses, including registering FIRs, collecting evidence, and arresting suspects.
However, these powers are not unlimited and are regulated by procedural safeguards and judicial oversight.
Courts have played a crucial role in defining the scope and limits of police investigation powers to protect citizens from abuse.
The balance between effective law enforcement and protection of fundamental rights is critical.
RELATED Blog
0 comments