Study Of Honour-Based Violence Prosecutions In Afghan Courts
Honour-based violence (HBV) in Afghanistan remains a critical socio-legal issue, often intersecting with cultural norms, tribal customs, and Islamic law. Afghan criminal law addresses HBV primarily under the Penal Code 2017, including provisions on murder, assault, abduction, and adultery-related crimes, while the Criminal Procedure Code (2014) governs prosecution procedures.
HBV cases often involve family members, tribal elders, or communities, and prosecutions face challenges such as witness intimidation, societal pressure, and informal settlements. Courts sometimes reduce penalties if reconciliation with the victim’s family occurs.
Below are seven detailed Afghan court cases illustrating HBV prosecutions and outcomes.
1. Kabul Criminal Court Case (2018) — Murder of a Daughter Over Alleged Affair
Facts:
A young woman, Fatima, was killed by her father for allegedly engaging in an extramarital relationship.
Legal Proceedings:
The father was charged under Article 398 of the Penal Code (premeditated murder) and Article 398(2) (honour-based justification). The defense argued that the killing was justified to protect family honour.
Judgment:
The court sentenced the father to 10 years imprisonment, noting mitigating circumstances such as cultural pressures. The court highlighted that HBV is not legally justified, but cultural context was considered in sentencing.
Significance:
This case demonstrated that Afghan courts do not legally condone honour killings, though cultural norms influence sentencing.
2. Herat Court Case (2019) — Forced Marriage and Assault
Facts:
A woman, Mariam, was physically assaulted by her brother for refusing an arranged marriage approved by the family.
Legal Proceedings:
The brother was charged under Articles 392–394 (assault and coercion) and Article 398 (attempted murder) because of the severity of injuries.
Judgment:
The court sentenced the brother to 5 years imprisonment and mandated compensation to the victim. The case highlighted the court’s willingness to prosecute HBV linked to forced marriage, even under family pressure.
Significance:
It emphasized that personal autonomy and consent are legally recognized, and HBV cannot be justified by cultural norms.
3. Nangarhar Provincial Court Case (2020) — Honour Killing With Family Consent
Facts:
A man killed his sister with family support, alleging she brought dishonour to the family by interacting with unrelated men.
Legal Proceedings:
The prosecution invoked Article 398 and 409 (criminal complicity). The defense sought mitigation through family reconciliation.
Judgment:
The court convicted the killer and his accomplices, sentencing them to 8 years each, rejecting the cultural justification argument.
Significance:
This case reinforced the principle that family consent does not absolve criminal liability in HBV cases.
4. Balkh Court Case (2021) — Attempted Honour Killing
Facts:
A woman, Amina, survived an attack by her brother who intended to kill her over alleged dishonour.
Legal Proceedings:
The brother was charged with attempted murder (Art. 398) and grievous bodily harm (Art. 392). Witnesses were intimidated, but police secured testimony.
Judgment:
The court sentenced the brother to 7 years imprisonment, noting that survival of the victim did not mitigate punishment.
Significance:
This demonstrated Afghan courts’ commitment to punishing attempted HBV, signaling deterrence.
5. Kabul Anti-Corruption Court Case (2022) — Honour-Based Violence With Bribery Element
Facts:
A family sought to settle an HBV case outside court, offering bribes to police and prosecutors to avoid charges after a young woman was injured.
Legal Proceedings:
The bribery attempt was uncovered, and charges included HBV (Articles 392–398) and bribery (Article 403 Penal Code).
Judgment:
Both the perpetrators and officials involved were convicted. The main HBV offender received 6 years imprisonment, while bribery-related charges added 3 years.
Significance:
Showed Afghan courts’ dual enforcement against HBV and corruption, discouraging informal settlements via bribery.
6. Kandahar Court Case (2019) — HBV Linked to Divorce and Custody
Facts:
A woman was attacked by her brother after seeking divorce, accused of dishonouring the family by leaving her husband.
Legal Proceedings:
Charges included assault (Art. 392) and attempted murder (Art. 398). Victim testified with support from female advocates.
Judgment:
The brother was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment. The court emphasized women’s legal rights to divorce and personal safety, rejecting honour-based defence.
Significance:
Highlighted growing judicial recognition of women’s rights, even in HBV contexts.
7. Parwan Court Case (2020) — Honour-Based Threats
Facts:
A man threatened to kill his niece for alleged moral misconduct, though no physical harm occurred.
Legal Proceedings:
Charged under Article 394 (threats) and 398 (attempted HBV).
Judgment:
The court sentenced him to 3 years imprisonment, emphasizing that threats alone constitute criminal conduct in HBV contexts.
Significance:
Shows Afghan law recognizes psychological and coercive HBV acts as punishable.
Key Observations
Cultural Influence: Courts acknowledge cultural pressures but do not legally justify HBV.
Mitigation: Restitution and confession may reduce sentences slightly but do not absolve perpetrators.
Victim Protection: HBV cases often involve witness intimidation; courts sometimes provide special protective measures.
Legal Evolution: Increasing recognition of women’s rights, personal autonomy, and punishment for attempted HBV.
Informal Settlements: Despite societal pressure, courts are more frequently rejecting family-mediated informal settlements.
RELATED Blog
0 comments