Compensation For Wrongful Convictions

πŸ” Overview: Compensation for Wrongful Convictions

After someone is exonerated, they may seek financial compensation through:

State compensation statutes

Federal civil rights lawsuits (e.g., under 42 U.S.C. Β§1983)

Private bills or settlements

But not all states have laws for automatic compensation β€” and proving harm in court is hard. Let’s study real cases to see how courts approach this.

πŸ”‘ Key Cases (with detailed explanation)

1. Kirk Bloodsworth (Maryland)

Background:
First death row inmate exonerated by DNA (convicted in 1985, exonerated in 1993).

Compensation:
Maryland passed special legislation granting him $300,000, as there was no standard compensation law at the time.

Significance:
Prompted Maryland to adopt a formal compensation statute β€” showing how landmark cases can lead to reform.

2. Anthony Graves (Texas)

Background:
Spent 18 years in prison (12 on death row) before his conviction was overturned due to prosecutorial misconduct and lack of evidence.

Compensation:
Awarded $1.45 million under the Texas Compensation Statute, which provides $80,000 per year of wrongful incarceration.

Significance:
Texas has one of the most generous compensation statutes β€” and this case became a national example of how justice systems can fail.

3. Ronald Cotton (North Carolina)

Background:
Spent over 10 years in prison after a mistaken eyewitness identification; exonerated by DNA in 1995.

Compensation:
Received $110,000 from the state and later settled a civil lawsuit with the city for an undisclosed amount.

Significance:
Led to major reforms in eyewitness identification procedures β€” and inspired legal education efforts through his joint book with the victim.

4. Juan Rivera (Illinois)

Background:
Wrongfully convicted of rape and murder; DNA excluded him, but he was still convicted (three times). Spent 20 years in prison.

Compensation:
Received $20 million in a civil rights settlement for violations including coerced confession and fabrication of evidence.

Significance:
One of the largest wrongful conviction settlements β€” shows that civil lawsuits can succeed when police misconduct is proven.

5. Dewey Bozella (New York)

Background:
Served 26 years for a murder he didn’t commit. Conviction overturned when prosecutors were found to have withheld exculpatory evidence.

Compensation:
Denied statutory compensation by New York (due to procedural issues), but later awarded $7.5 million in a federal civil rights lawsuit.

Significance:
Shows the challenges of state compensation β€” and how Β§1983 suits offer an alternative when constitutional rights are violated.

6. Richard Phillips (Michigan)

Background:
Spent 45 years in prison β€” the longest-known wrongful incarceration in U.S. history. Exonerated in 2018.

Compensation:
Received $1.5 million under Michigan's Wrongful Imprisonment Compensation Act.

Significance:
Case led to increased attention to elderly exonerees and delays in state compensation processing.

Summary Table

NameTime ServedCompensationRoute TakenKey Issue Highlighted
Kirk Bloodsworth9 years$300,000 (legislation)Special law (MD)First DNA exoneration on death row
Anthony Graves18 years$1.45 millionState statute (TX)Prosecutorial misconduct
Ronald Cotton10.5 years$110,000 + settlementState + civil settlementEyewitness error
Juan Rivera20 years$20 millionCivil rights lawsuitCoerced confession, police misconduct
Dewey Bozella26 years$7.5 millionΒ§1983 civil suitBrady violations
Richard Phillips45 years$1.5 millionState statute (MI)Longest-known wrongful sentence

βš–οΈ Legal Principles Seen in These Cases

State compensation laws vary: Some are generous (like Texas), others have strict requirements or caps.

Civil rights lawsuits under 42 U.S.C. Β§1983: Can award large damages, but require proof of official misconduct.

Brady violations: Withholding exculpatory evidence can lead to overturning convictions and open the door to civil lawsuits.

Quick question for you:

Why might a person who was wrongfully convicted not receive compensation, even if they were fully exonerated?

(Hint: Think about legal procedures, burden of proof, or gaps in state laws.)

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments