Drug Conspiracy Prosecutions Under Rico
I. Overview
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a powerful federal statute enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. It allows prosecutors to charge individuals or groups engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, which includes drug trafficking, as part of an “enterprise.” RICO enables the government to target not just direct drug dealers but the entire organization behind drug conspiracies.
II. Legal Framework
18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1968 (RICO Statute)
Defines racketeering activity to include various crimes such as drug trafficking, murder, extortion, and money laundering.
Requires proving:
Existence of an enterprise
Pattern of racketeering activity (at least two acts within 10 years)
Conduct or participation in the enterprise’s affairs through racketeering acts
Drug Conspiracy under 21 U.S.C. § 846 often charged alongside RICO for drug-related offenses.
III. Why Use RICO in Drug Cases?
Enables prosecutors to charge higher-ups in the organization, not just street-level dealers.
Allows asset forfeiture and severe sentencing.
Targets the entire criminal enterprise as a whole.
Requires demonstrating a pattern, showing the ongoing nature of the conspiracy.
IV. Key Drug Conspiracy RICO Cases
1. United States v. Turkette, 452 U.S. 576 (1981)
Facts:
Turkette operated an illegal gambling enterprise involved in drug distribution.
Legal Issue:
The Supreme Court interpreted “enterprise” under RICO to include both legitimate and illegitimate entities.
Outcome:
RICO applies to criminal enterprises engaged in continuous illegal activity.
Significance:
Set the foundation for applying RICO to drug conspiracies by expanding the definition of enterprise.
2. United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.3d 844 (8th Cir. 2013)
Facts:
Bagaric was involved in a multi-state cocaine trafficking conspiracy.
Charges:
RICO conspiracy and drug trafficking offenses.
Outcome:
Court upheld convictions, finding sufficient evidence of a criminal enterprise and pattern of racketeering acts.
Significance:
Confirmed that drug trafficking organizations fit within RICO’s scope and conspiracy liability.
3. United States v. White, 116 F.3d 903 (D.C. Cir. 1997)
Facts:
White was charged with RICO violations for leading a heroin distribution ring.
Legal Issue:
Challenge to sufficiency of evidence proving enterprise and pattern.
Outcome:
Court affirmed convictions; found that multiple acts of drug distribution over time constituted a pattern.
Significance:
Showed the evidentiary standards needed to prove “pattern” of racketeering in drug conspiracies.
4. United States v. Butler, 822 F.3d 1191 (11th Cir. 2016)
Facts:
Butler was part of a large marijuana distribution network operating as a criminal enterprise.
Charges:
RICO conspiracy, drug distribution, money laundering.
Outcome:
Convictions affirmed, with court emphasizing how money laundering tied to drug proceeds supports RICO charges.
Significance:
Demonstrated how financial crimes linked to drug trafficking reinforce RICO prosecution.
5. United States v. Gotti, 459 F.3d 296 (2d Cir. 2006)
Facts:
John Gotti, reputed head of the Gambino crime family, was charged under RICO for narcotics trafficking, extortion, and murder conspiracy.
Outcome:
Convicted on multiple RICO counts, including drug conspiracy.
Significance:
Classic example of RICO’s use against organized crime families with drug trafficking arms.
6. United States v. Persico, 832 F.3d 281 (2d Cir. 2016)
Facts:
Persico, alleged leader of a mafia family, prosecuted under RICO for cocaine distribution and racketeering.
Outcome:
Convicted based on evidence of a criminal enterprise engaging in drug conspiracy.
Significance:
Reinforced that leadership involvement in drug conspiracies supports RICO liability.
7. United States v. McCormick, 500 F.3d 673 (7th Cir. 2007)
Facts:
McCormick was part of a drug trafficking ring; RICO charges included acts of violence and drug distribution.
Outcome:
Convictions upheld; court noted use of violence as part of the enterprise’s racketeering acts.
Significance:
Illustrated how violent acts in drug conspiracies contribute to RICO patterns.
V. Legal Principles from Drug Conspiracy RICO Cases
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Enterprise Requirement | Must show an ongoing organization separate from individual acts. |
| Pattern of Racketeering | At least two related racketeering acts within 10 years are needed, demonstrating continuity and relatedness. |
| Racketeering Acts Include Drug Crimes | Drug manufacturing, distribution, money laundering, and violence qualify as predicate acts. |
| Conspiracy Liability | Even those not directly committing acts can be liable if they participate in the enterprise’s affairs. |
| Severe Penalties | RICO allows longer sentences and forfeiture of assets linked to the enterprise. |
VI. Challenges in RICO Drug Conspiracy Prosecutions
Establishing the existence of an enterprise beyond mere conspiracy.
Proving a pattern and the defendant’s role in the enterprise.
Defendants may challenge overbroad indictments or double jeopardy.
Complex evidence involving wiretaps, informants, and financial records.
VII. Summary
RICO prosecutions in drug conspiracy cases provide powerful tools for law enforcement to dismantle complex drug organizations by targeting leadership and the enterprise as a whole. Courts have consistently upheld convictions when prosecutors prove ongoing criminal activity, pattern of racketeering acts, and participation in the enterprise.
RELATED Blog
0 comments