Directors’ Liability In Fraud
Directors’ Liability in Fraud: Overview
Directors of a company have fiduciary duties and are expected to act honestly and in good faith, promoting the best interest of the company and its shareholders. When directors commit fraud, they breach their fiduciary duties and may be held personally liable.
Fraud by directors can involve:
Misrepresentation of company financials
Misappropriation of company assets
Concealment of material facts
Acts causing loss to the company or third parties
The liability arises both in civil law (compensation and disgorgement of gains) and criminal law (penalties and imprisonment).
Case 1: Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1942] UKHL 1
Facts:
Directors of Regal (Hastings) Ltd used their position to gain a personal profit by acquiring shares in a subsidiary company at a favorable rate, without full disclosure to the parent company.
Issue:
Whether directors must account for profits made due to their position even if the company did not suffer a loss.
Held:
The House of Lords held that directors must account for any profits made from their position, regardless of whether the company suffered any loss. This established the strict fiduciary duty to avoid conflicts of interest and not to profit personally from their position without consent.
Significance:
This case underlines that fraudulent gain by directors, even if no loss is caused, is actionable, and directors can be held liable for such profits.
Case 2: Percival v Wright [1902] 2 Ch 421
Facts:
Directors sold their shares to a third party without disclosing ongoing negotiations to the company for a sale of the business.
Issue:
Whether directors owe a fiduciary duty to individual shareholders when selling their own shares.
Held:
The court held directors owe duties to the company, not to individual shareholders, unless there is a special relationship.
Significance:
Though this case does not deal with fraud directly, it clarifies the scope of directors' fiduciary duties—primarily to the company, not to individual shareholders, which affects the extent of liability in cases of misrepresentation or fraud.
Case 3: Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum Ltd [1974] AC 821
Facts:
Directors issued shares to dilute the voting power of a shareholder, allegedly for the purpose of maintaining control, rather than for the company’s benefit.
Issue:
Whether directors acted fraudulently in issuing shares to influence voting control.
Held:
The Privy Council held that although the directors had the power to issue shares, they must exercise it for a proper purpose (company benefit). Issuing shares solely to affect voting rights was improper and thus fraudulent.
Significance:
Directors can be held liable if they misuse their powers for improper purposes, constituting fraud on the company.
Case 4: Re Barings plc (No 5) [1999] 1 BCLC 433
Facts:
Barings Bank collapsed due to unauthorized trading by Nick Leeson, a trader. The question arose as to the liability of directors for failing to supervise and prevent fraud.
Issue:
Whether directors are liable for negligence in failing to detect fraud.
Held:
The court held directors can be liable if they fail to exercise proper oversight and allow fraud to occur, even if they were not directly involved.
Significance:
Directors’ liability extends beyond direct involvement in fraud to failure in supervision and internal controls that enable fraud.
Case 5: Smith v Fawcett Ltd [1942] Ch 304
Facts:
Directors issued shares for an improper purpose benefiting certain shareholders.
Issue:
Whether directors’ actions were fraudulent.
Held:
Directors must exercise their discretion bona fide in the interests of the company as a whole. Any fraudulent or improper purpose invalidates their acts.
Significance:
This case reinforces that the proper exercise of directors’ powers must be honest and for the company’s benefit, failure of which leads to liability.
Summary of Principles on Directors’ Liability in Fraud:
Fiduciary Duty: Directors must act honestly and in good faith for the benefit of the company (Regal Hastings, Smith v Fawcett).
No Profit Without Consent: Directors must not make secret profits or gains from their position (Regal Hastings).
Proper Purpose Doctrine: Powers must be exercised for legitimate purposes (Howard Smith Ltd).
Liability for Negligence in Supervision: Directors can be liable for failing to prevent fraud through oversight (Re Barings).
Duty to Company, Not Individual Shareholders: Directors owe duties primarily to the company (Percival v Wright).
RELATED Blog
0 comments