Fake News And Election Interference
What is Fake News?
Fake news refers to deliberately fabricated or misleading information presented as news, intended to deceive people.
In the election context, fake news can be used to manipulate voters’ opinions, defame candidates, create communal disharmony, or spread misinformation.
Fake news can circulate through social media, messaging apps, websites, or traditional media.
Election Interference
Election interference includes any unlawful act to influence the outcome of elections.
Fake news is a potent tool for interference, undermining free and fair elections.
Other forms include hacking electronic voting machines, voter intimidation, spreading rumors to suppress turnout, and misuse of government machinery.
Legal Framework in India
Representation of the People Act, 1951: Prohibits corrupt practices, including false statements about candidates.
Indian Penal Code (IPC):
Section 499: Defamation
Section 505: Statements conducing to public mischief
Section 153A: Promoting enmity between groups
Information Technology Act, 2000:
Section 66A (struck down but earlier used against fake news)
Section 66F: Cyber terrorism
Section 69A: Blocking of websites spreading misinformation
Model Code of Conduct (MCC): Enforced by Election Commission to ensure free and fair elections.
Key Issues Addressed by Courts
The courts balance freedom of speech and expression with the need to prevent false information harming elections.
They stress due diligence by social media platforms to curb spread of fake news.
Courts also emphasize prompt action by election authorities against offenders.
Important Case Laws on Fake News and Election Interference
1. Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India (2016) 7 SCC 221
Facts: Challenge regarding the role of social media platforms and fake news during elections.
Issue: Whether social media platforms can be regulated to prevent fake news affecting elections.
Judgment: Supreme Court acknowledged challenges posed by fake news and urged strict regulation while protecting free speech.
Significance: Called for a balanced approach towards fake news in election context.
2. People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) v. Union of India (2013) 4 SCC 399
Facts: Case about protecting voters’ rights against misinformation and intimidation.
Issue: Court’s role in ensuring free and fair elections by curbing fake news and interference.
Judgment: Court directed Election Commission to use technology and enforcement to stop misinformation.
Significance: Strengthened Election Commission’s powers to act against fake news.
3. Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar (1962) 3 SCR 769
Facts: Concerned Section 153A of IPC about promoting enmity through false statements.
Issue: Applicability in context of fake news during elections.
Judgment: Court upheld provisions protecting public order, relevant to preventing communal fake news.
Significance: Formed basis for dealing with communal misinformation in elections.
4. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) 5 SCC 1
Facts: Challenge to Section 66A of IT Act, which was often used against alleged fake news.
Issue: Whether Section 66A violated free speech rights.
Judgment: Supreme Court struck down Section 66A for vagueness but emphasized alternate laws to check misuse of social media.
Significance: Highlighted the need for clear laws to address fake news without stifling speech.
5. Election Commission of India v. Ashok Kumar Pandey (1993) 2 SCC 382
Facts: Defamation and false statements in election campaigns.
Issue: Whether making false statements about a candidate is corrupt practice.
Judgment: Supreme Court held that false statements about candidates are corrupt practices under the Representation of the People Act.
Significance: Important precedent to curb fake news and misinformation during elections.
6. Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) 3 SCC 637
Facts: Concerned internet shutdowns but touched upon flow of information during sensitive times like elections.
Issue: Right to free flow of information and controlling misinformation.
Judgment: Court emphasized the necessity of free communication but recognized need for reasonable restrictions.
Significance: Important for balancing free speech and misinformation control during elections.
7. Facebook India Private Ltd. v. Union of India (2021) (Relevant for fake news)
Facts: Pertains to social media companies’ role in preventing spread of fake news.
Issue: Whether platforms must remove fake news promptly to protect electoral integrity.
Judgment: Though still evolving, courts and Election Commission have insisted platforms comply with local laws and take proactive steps.
Significance: Ongoing trend towards holding tech platforms accountable.
Summary Table: Fake News & Election Interference
| Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Fake News Definition | Deliberate misinformation affecting voters |
| Legal Provisions | IPC Sections 499, 505, 153A; IT Act; RP Act |
| Court Focus | Balance free speech with election integrity |
| Election Commission Role | Monitor, act against fake news |
| Tech Platforms | Increasing accountability to curb misinformation |
| Punishment | Can lead to disqualification, fines, imprisonment |
RELATED Blog
0 comments