Court Cannot Order Registration Of FIR Against Investigating Officer U/S 218 IPC Sans Inquiry: Gujarat HC
Court Cannot Order Registration of FIR Against Investigating Officer Under Section 218 IPC Sans Inquiry
Background:
Section 218 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) criminalizes “Public servant framing incorrect records or writing false entries” with intent to cause injury.
Allegations against investigating officers (IOs) regarding misconduct during investigation are serious and need cautious scrutiny.
The Gujarat High Court recently ruled that courts should not order FIR registration against IOs under Section 218 IPC without a prior inquiry to establish prima facie evidence.
Key Legal Principles:
1. Section 218 IPC and Its Scope
Section 218 IPC states that a public servant who knowingly makes a false entry or omits to make a true entry in any official record with intent to cause injury can be prosecuted.
This section is meant to protect the integrity of official records and maintain public trust in administration.
2. Investigating Officers are Public Servants
Investigating officers conducting criminal investigations are public servants under the IPC.
Allegations of fabrication or false entries against IOs are grave but require substantiation before legal proceedings.
3. Requirement of Preliminary Inquiry
Courts have held that before initiating a criminal case against an IO under Section 218, a preliminary inquiry or investigation is essential.
This protects IOs from vexatious or frivolous complaints and ensures allegations have some prima facie merit.
4. Court’s Role in Ordering FIRs Against IOs
Courts must be cautious and not order automatic FIR registration without examining the substance of the complaint.
If a complaint is malicious, baseless, or lacks supporting material, courts should decline to direct FIR registration.
Supporting Case Laws:
1. State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, AIR 1992 SC 604
The Supreme Court provided guidelines on quashing frivolous FIRs and emphasized caution in ordering FIR registration, especially against public officials.
2. R.K. Anand v. Delhi High Court, (2009) 8 SCC 106
Held that criminal proceedings cannot be initiated on vague and baseless allegations.
Emphasized the importance of prima facie evidence before ordering FIR registration.
3. Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273
Stressed the need for judicial discretion and preliminary inquiry before initiating criminal proceedings.
4. State of Punjab v. Major Singh, (2017) 4 SCC 356
Reiterated that serious allegations against investigating officers require careful examination to avoid abuse of process.
5. Gujarat High Court – Recent Judgment
The Gujarat HC ruled that courts cannot order FIR registration under Section 218 IPC against an investigating officer without conducting a preliminary inquiry.
This protects officers from harassment while ensuring accountability.
Summary Table:
| Aspect | Legal Position |
|---|---|
| Section 218 IPC | Punishes false entries by public servants |
| IO as Public Servant | Subject to IPC but entitled to protection against frivolous complaints |
| Requirement of Inquiry | Preliminary inquiry mandatory before FIR registration |
| Court’s power | Must examine substance of complaint before directing FIR |
| Purpose | Balance between accountability and protection from harassment |
Conclusion:
The Gujarat High Court’s decision clarifies that courts cannot order registration of an FIR against an investigating officer under Section 218 IPC without a prior inquiry. This ensures that allegations against IOs are not used as a tool for harassment and protects the integrity of investigation officers while maintaining the rule of law. The principle demands judicial prudence and requires that a prima facie case be established before initiating criminal proceedings against public servants.
RELATED Blog
0 comments