Digital Stalking Offences
What is Digital Stalking?
Digital stalking refers to the use of the internet, social media platforms, email, messaging apps, or other electronic communication tools to harass, intimidate, or monitor another individual persistently. Unlike traditional stalking, digital stalking can happen remotely, making it harder for victims to escape or detect.
Key Elements of Digital Stalking:
Repeated or persistent behavior: Unwanted contact or communication.
Intent to harass, intimidate, or cause distress: The perpetrator’s purpose is to cause emotional or psychological harm.
Use of digital means: Via emails, social media, text messages, location tracking, spyware, etc.
Victim’s reasonable fear or distress: The victim feels threatened or distressed due to the behavior.
Legal Framework
Most jurisdictions incorporate stalking laws under harassment, cyber harassment, or cybercrime statutes.
These laws often specify digital stalking as an offence punishable by fines, restraining orders, or imprisonment.
Proof often requires evidence of communication records, logs, screenshots, and witness testimonies.
Important Case Laws on Digital Stalking
1. United States v. Lori Drew (2008)
Facts: Lori Drew was involved in a case where she created a fake MySpace account to cyberbully a teenager, Megan Meier, who later committed suicide.
Legal Issue: Whether the use of digital platforms to harass and cause psychological harm constitutes a cybercrime.
Outcome: Lori Drew was convicted under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) for unauthorized access, but the case highlighted the legal limits and challenges in prosecuting digital harassment and stalking.
Significance: It brought attention to the need for specific laws addressing digital stalking and cyberbullying beyond traditional harassment laws.
2. R v. Bowden (2014) – UK Case
Facts: Bowden was found guilty of repeatedly sending sexually explicit messages to a young woman through social media, causing her severe distress.
Legal Issue: Whether repeated digital communication with intent to cause alarm or distress constitutes stalking under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (UK).
Outcome: The court held that repeated electronic communication could amount to harassment and stalking.
Significance: Established that digital communication alone, if persistent and distressing, can meet the criteria for stalking under existing harassment laws.
3. People v. Carpenter (2016) – California, USA
Facts: Carpenter repeatedly sent unwanted texts and emails to his ex-girlfriend, despite multiple requests to stop.
Legal Issue: Whether persistent digital communication without consent amounts to stalking under California Penal Code 646.9.
Outcome: Carpenter was convicted for stalking and received a restraining order.
Significance: Reinforced that courts treat digital stalking on par with physical stalking, emphasizing victim protection in the digital age.
4. State v. Kramer (2017) – Ohio, USA
Facts: Kramer was convicted for installing spyware on his partner’s phone to monitor her digital activities without consent.
Legal Issue: Whether unauthorized tracking and surveillance via digital means constitute stalking.
Outcome: Conviction upheld on grounds of electronic harassment and stalking.
Significance: Extended the scope of stalking offences to include unauthorized digital surveillance.
5. R v. B (2015) – Canada
Facts: The accused repeatedly sent threatening emails and created fake profiles to harass the victim.
Legal Issue: Application of the Canadian Criminal Code on stalking and harassment in the digital context.
Outcome: The court ruled these acts constituted criminal harassment.
Significance: Demonstrated the adaptability of stalking laws to the evolving digital landscape in Canadian jurisprudence.
6. State v. Strickland (2018) – Texas, USA
Facts: The defendant sent repeated threatening messages through social media platforms to an ex-partner.
Legal Issue: Interpretation of digital communication as a form of stalking under Texas Penal Code.
Outcome: Convicted of stalking; court issued a protective order.
Significance: Highlighted legal recognition of digital stalking as serious and punishable by law.
Summary
The rise of digital communication has extended the traditional concept of stalking into the virtual world. Courts globally have adapted existing legal frameworks or developed new statutes to hold offenders accountable for digital stalking. The key themes across these cases include:
The persistence and intent behind digital communications.
Recognition that digital stalking can cause serious psychological harm.
The importance of victim protection via restraining orders or criminal sanctions.
The challenge of evidence collection in digital formats.
RELATED Blog
0 comments