Cites Treaty Offences Prosecutions
๐น 1. What is the CITES Treaty?
CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) is an international treaty aiming to ensure that international trade in wild animals and plants does not threaten their survival. It classifies species under three Appendices:
Appendix I: Species threatened with extinction โ trade permitted only in exceptional circumstances.
Appendix II: Not necessarily threatened but trade must be controlled.
Appendix III: Species protected in at least one country.
The UK enforces CITES through domestic legislation such as:
Control of Trade in Endangered Species (Enforcement) Regulations 1997 and 2018 (COTES)
Customs and Excise Management Act 1979
Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981
๐น 2. Offences under UK Law
Under COTES, it's a criminal offence to:
Import/export CITES-listed species without proper permits.
Trade in live endangered species or parts/products (e.g., ivory, tiger skins, rhino horn).
Falsify documents or mislabel CITES specimens.
Keep or sell endangered species unlawfully.
๐น 3. Key CITES Prosecutions in the UK โ Case Law
โ Case 1: R v. Kevin Leonard (2005)
Facts:
Kevin Leonard was found guilty of importing endangered parrots (Blue-fronted Amazons) from South America without permits. The parrots were concealed in a suitcase and smuggled via Heathrow Airport.
Charges:
Illegal importation of Appendix II species without documentation under COTES and Customs Act.
Judgment:
6 months imprisonment.
Parrots confiscated and rehomed.
Court emphasized that conservation was the underlying concern of the offence.
Significance:
One of the first custodial sentences for illegal trade in live CITES species in the UK.
โ Case 2: R v. Donald MacKenzie (2010)
Facts:
The defendant was caught selling tiger parts (teeth, claws, skin pieces) online. Tigers are Appendix I species, making trade strictly controlled.
Charges:
Offering for sale items derived from Appendix I species without exemption or permits.
Judgment:
Sentenced to 12 months suspended imprisonment.
Fined ยฃ3,000 and ordered to forfeit all items.
Court cited seriousness of trade in protected species and deterrence.
Significance:
Highlighted growing issue of online wildlife trafficking and importance of digital monitoring.
โ Case 3: R v. Anwar Ahmed (2012)
Facts:
The defendant attempted to smuggle 4 kg of ivory into the UK from Kenya, concealed within wooden carvings. The ivory was from African elephants (Appendix I).
Charges:
Importing banned wildlife products and breaching CITES.
Judgment:
18 months imprisonment.
Ivory confiscated and destroyed.
The judge stressed that ivory smuggling fuels poaching and ecological harm.
Significance:
Important case showing that even "artistic" items made from ivory are not exempt.
โ Case 4: R v. Peter Bailey (2014)
Facts:
Peter Bailey, a taxidermist, was prosecuted for possessing and offering for sale multiple CITES specimens, including a snow leopard skin and mounted birds of prey, without Article 10 certificates.
Charges:
Unlawful possession and commercial use of protected species under COTES and Wildlife and Countryside Act.
Judgment:
Fined ยฃ8,000 and specimens forfeited.
Banned from trading in wildlife for five years.
Court rejected the argument that items were "antique" without proof.
Significance:
Clarified requirements for proof of lawful acquisition and Article 10 exemption certificates.
โ Case 5: R v. Chen Huang (2016)
Facts:
Defendant was part of an organised gang importing pangolin scales (Appendix I) into the UK for use in traditional medicine.
Charges:
Importation of CITES-listed species and conspiracy to evade customs duties.
Judgment:
3 years imprisonment.
Gangโs profits (ยฃ400,000+) confiscated under Proceeds of Crime Act.
Court noted global impact of pangolin poaching and UKโs international duty.
Significance:
Landmark case on the illegal trade of pangolin derivatives in Europe.
โ Case 6: R v. John Haywood (2021)
Facts:
John Haywood, a dealer in exotic leather, was charged for importing belts and wallets made from crocodile and python skins (Appendix II) without valid CITES permits.
Charges:
Importing and offering for sale endangered species products without valid documents.
Judgment:
Sentenced to 9 months in prison.
Ordered to compensate buyers and destroy illegal stock.
The court warned retailers and importers to ensure full compliance with CITES rules.
Significance:
Targeted the fashion industryโs role in illegal wildlife trade.
๐น 4. Common Legal Themes
| Legal Principle | Description | Case Example |
|---|---|---|
| Strict liability for import/export | Permits required regardless of knowledge or intent | R v. Leonard, R v. Ahmed |
| Commercial use of specimens | Requires Article 10 certificates for sale | R v. Bailey |
| No antique exemption without proof | Burden on defendant to prove age and legality | R v. Bailey |
| Digital platforms monitored | Online wildlife trade subject to criminal penalties | R v. MacKenzie |
| Organised crime involvement | Many cases involve transnational smuggling networks | R v. Huang |
๐น 5. Challenges in Prosecution
Identification of species โ determining whether a specimen is protected under CITES.
False documentation โ forged permits or misuse of exemptions.
Cultural defences โ e.g., use of animal parts in traditional medicine.
Online marketplaces โ detecting and policing digital wildlife trade.
International coordination โ especially where shipments come from or pass through multiple countries.
๐น 6. Preventive & Enforcement Measures
Border Force and National Wildlife Crime Unit (NWCU) monitoring imports and exports.
Training for customs officials on CITES species identification.
Collaboration with Interpol and other nations to track global wildlife trafficking.
Public awareness campaigns on the illegality of exotic wildlife products.
Targeting sellers through undercover operations and online stings.
๐น 7. Conclusion
CITES prosecutions in the UK demonstrate a strong legal response to illegal wildlife trade. Courts impose custodial sentences, heavy fines, and forfeiture of items to deter trafficking in endangered species. As both a transit and destination country, the UK plays a critical role in global efforts to combat the exploitation of threatened flora and fauna.
RELATED Blog
0 comments