Lgbtq Civil Rights Criminal Law Research
Overview: LGBTQ Civil Rights in Criminal Law
Historically, LGBTQ individuals have faced criminal prosecution based on their sexual orientation or gender identity, including laws criminalizing same-sex conduct, cross-dressing, and transgender status. Over time, courts have invalidated many discriminatory laws and extended constitutional protections to LGBTQ people, particularly in relation to privacy, equal protection, and due process.
Landmark Cases in LGBTQ Civil Rights & Criminal Law
1. Lawrence v. Texas (2003)
Facts:
John Lawrence and Tyron Garner were arrested in Texas for consensual same-sex sexual activity under the state's anti-sodomy law.
Legal Issue:
Does a state law criminalizing consensual same-sex sexual conduct violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
Ruling:
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the law is unconstitutional, affirming the right to privacy and liberty in consensual adult relationships.
Significance:
Overturned Bowers v. Hardwick (1986); invalidated all remaining anti-sodomy laws in the U.S., a major victory for LGBTQ civil rights.
2. United States v. Windsor (2013)
Facts:
Edith Windsor was denied a federal estate tax exemption after her same-sex spouse died, because the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) defined marriage federally as between one man and one woman.
Legal Issue:
Does DOMA violate the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection?
Ruling:
Yes. The Court struck down Section 3 of DOMA as unconstitutional.
Significance:
Although primarily a marriage equality case, it had important implications for criminal law by recognizing equal treatment under federal law for LGBTQ individuals.
3. Bostock v. Clayton County (2020)
Facts:
Gerald Bostock was fired from his job after joining a gay softball league.
Legal Issue:
Does Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination “because of sex,” cover sexual orientation and gender identity?
Ruling:
The Supreme Court ruled that it does, extending federal workplace protections to LGBTQ employees.
Significance:
Though a civil employment case, Bostock impacts criminal law by reinforcing nondiscrimination principles in government and policing practices.
4. Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins (1989) (Early transgender employment case)
Facts:
Ann Hopkins was denied partnership at Price Waterhouse due to gender stereotyping.
Legal Issue:
Does sex discrimination under Title VII include discrimination based on failure to conform to gender norms?
Ruling:
Yes. The Court held that gender stereotyping is a form of sex discrimination.
Significance:
Laid the groundwork for later protections of transgender people in criminal justice and civil rights contexts.
5. Glenn v. Brumby (2011) (11th Circuit Court of Appeals)
Facts:
Vandy Beth Glenn was fired from her job after coming out as transgender.
Legal Issue:
Does firing someone based on transgender status violate equal protection?
Ruling:
The court ruled that discrimination based on transgender status is a form of sex discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause.
Significance:
An important appellate case affirming protections for transgender people, influencing treatment in criminal justice settings.
6. State v. Morales (Colorado, 2009)
Facts:
Alejandra Morales was arrested under laws targeting sex workers; her defense raised issues of profiling and harassment of transgender individuals.
Legal Issue:
The case raised questions about the enforcement of criminal laws disproportionately targeting transgender people.
Outcome:
The case brought attention to reforming policing practices and protecting transgender individuals from discriminatory law enforcement.
Significance:
Highlighting systemic discrimination, this case contributed to discussions about bias in criminal prosecutions.
7. People v. Aguilar (California, 2016)
Facts:
A transgender woman, victim of a hate crime, faced challenges in prosecution because of evidentiary rules about gender identity.
Legal Issue:
Ensuring hate crime statutes cover crimes motivated by bias against gender identity.
Outcome:
The case advanced protections under California’s expanded hate crime laws.
Significance:
Strengthened criminal protections for LGBTQ victims, including transgender individuals.
Summary Table
| Case Name | Year | Issue Addressed | Outcome | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lawrence v. Texas | 2003 | Criminalization of same-sex conduct | Anti-sodomy laws unconstitutional | Landmark privacy and liberty ruling for LGBTQ |
| United States v. Windsor | 2013 | Federal recognition of same-sex marriage | DOMA section struck down | Federal equal protection for LGBTQ couples |
| Bostock v. Clayton County | 2020 | Employment discrimination protections | Title VII covers sexual orientation and gender identity | Extended LGBTQ protections to employment law |
| Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins | 1989 | Gender stereotyping as sex discrimination | Sex discrimination includes gender norms | Groundwork for transgender protections |
| Glenn v. Brumby | 2011 | Equal protection for transgender employees | Discrimination based on transgender status violates Equal Protection | Important appellate precedent |
| State v. Morales (CO) | 2009 | Profiling and targeting transgender people | Brought attention to discriminatory policing | Contributed to reform of policing practices |
| People v. Aguilar (CA) | 2016 | Hate crimes protections for transgender victims | Enhanced protections under hate crime laws | Strengthened criminal justice protections for LGBTQ |
Research Topics Inspired by These Cases
The evolution of privacy rights for LGBTQ individuals in criminal law
Impact of anti-sodomy law invalidation on policing and prosecutions
Legal challenges in prosecuting hate crimes against LGBTQ persons
Discrimination against transgender individuals in criminal justice and law enforcement
Employment protections for LGBTQ people and their influence on criminal justice professionals
Federal vs. state protections for LGBTQ persons in criminal law contexts
Effect of landmark Supreme Court rulings on everyday policing of LGBTQ communities
RELATED Blog
0 comments