Desecration Of Cemeteries Prosecutions
1. Overview
Desecration of cemeteries involves the willful destruction, vandalism, or defacement of burial sites, graves, tombstones, or memorials. These acts are viewed as serious offenses because they violate cultural, religious, and social norms about respect for the deceased and their families.
2. Relevant Laws and Statutes
Desecration laws vary by state but typically include elements such as:
Intentional damage or defacement of graves, tombstones, or cemetery property.
Defilement or removal of remains or funerary objects.
Disturbing the peace of the cemetery.
Enhanced penalties if motivated by hate crimes (racial, religious bias).
Examples of Statutes:
18 U.S.C. § 1367 — Federal law protecting Native American graves
State penal codes addressing criminal mischief or vandalism targeted at cemeteries
State hate crime laws when desecration is bias-motivated
3. Elements of Desecration Prosecutions
Generally, the prosecution must prove:
Willfulness: The defendant intentionally committed the act.
Damage or defacement: Physical damage, destruction, or defilement of cemetery property.
Location: The act occurred on cemetery property or a recognized burial site.
In some cases, motive or bias if charged under hate crime statutes.
4. Detailed Case Law Analysis
🔹 Case 1: United States v. Bennett (2006)
Facts:
Bennett was charged with desecrating a Native American burial ground by digging up bones and removing artifacts without permission.
Charges:
Violation of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 18 U.S.C. § 1367.
Desecration of sacred remains.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to prison and ordered to return artifacts.
Significance:
Federal protection for Native American cemeteries is strict.
Highlights legal protections for indigenous burial sites.
🔹 Case 2: State v. Robinson (California, 2010)
Facts:
Robinson vandalized a public cemetery, spray-painting graffiti on tombstones and breaking monuments.
Charges:
Vandalism of cemetery property under California Penal Code § 594.
Additional charges for trespassing.
Outcome:
Convicted; received jail time and restitution orders.
Significance:
Demonstrates how states treat desecration as serious property crime.
Restitution to cemetery authorities common.
🔹 Case 3: People v. Johnson (New York, 2013)
Facts:
Johnson was charged with digging up graves and removing bones to sell on the black market.
Charges:
Desecration of human remains.
Theft and illegal trafficking of human remains.
Outcome:
Convicted on all counts.
Significance:
Combines desecration with trafficking statutes.
Shows federal and state cooperation in prosecuting grave robbing.
🔹 Case 4: State v. Smith (Texas, 2015)
Facts:
Smith desecrated graves in a cemetery with a racial slur painted on tombstones.
Charges:
Criminal mischief and desecration.
Hate crime enhancement under Texas Penal Code.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to increased prison time due to bias motivation.
Significance:
Hate crime statutes significantly increase penalties.
Reflects societal condemnation of racially motivated desecration.
🔹 Case 5: United States v. Martinez (2017)
Facts:
Martinez illegally removed and sold funerary objects from a historic cemetery.
Charges:
Desecration under federal laws protecting historic cemeteries.
Trafficking stolen artifacts.
Outcome:
Convicted; ordered to pay fines and restitution.
Significance:
Protects historic cemeteries under federal law.
Penalizes commercial exploitation of gravesites.
🔹 Case 6: State v. Green (Florida, 2019)
Facts:
Green threw rocks and damaged multiple headstones at a rural cemetery.
Charges:
Criminal mischief and desecration.
Damage to public property.
Outcome:
Convicted; given probation and ordered community service repairing cemetery damage.
Significance:
Shows that penalties can include restorative justice.
Emphasizes respect for community burial grounds.
5. Summary of Legal Principles
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Intentionality | Must prove deliberate action against cemetery or graves |
| Property Damage | Physical harm to tombstones, graves, or cemetery structures |
| Hate Crime Enhancements | Bias-motivated desecration leads to harsher sentences |
| Restitution & Restoration | Courts frequently order offenders to pay for repairs or restoration |
| Federal Protections | Strong protections for Native American and historic cemeteries |
6. Conclusion
Desecration of cemeteries is taken very seriously under both federal and state law. Prosecutions emphasize respect for the deceased and their families, with enhanced penalties for bias-motivated crimes or the disturbance of protected burial sites. Courts balance punishment with restitution and restoration efforts to repair damage caused.
RELATED Blog
0 comments