Nft Fraud Prosecutions
π What is NFT Fraud?
NFT fraud refers to illegal or deceptive practices involving NFTs (unique digital assets stored on blockchain). It can include:
Rug pulls: Creating fake projects and disappearing with investorsβ funds.
Wash trading: Faking transactions to inflate NFT value.
Impersonation: Minting NFTs using stolen art or identities.
Pump-and-dump schemes: Artificially inflating prices before selling off.
Insider trading: Using confidential information for personal NFT trading advantage.
These are prosecuted under existing fraud, wire fraud, securities, and money laundering laws, even though NFTs are relatively new.
β Landmark NFT Fraud Prosecutions with Case Law
1. United States v. Nathaniel Chastain (2022β2023)
Jurisdiction: United States (Southern District of New York)
Facts:
Nathaniel Chastain was a former product manager at OpenSea, the largest NFT marketplace.
He used insider information about which NFTs were going to be featured on the OpenSea homepage to buy them in advance, and sold them for profit once their value surged.
Charges:
Wire fraud and money laundering.
Held:
In May 2023, Chastain was found guilty of wire fraud and money laundering, marking the first insider trading conviction involving NFTs.
Significance:
Set a legal precedent: NFTs can be considered "property" under wire fraud statutes.
Insider trading laws apply even if the asset isn't a traditional security.
2. United States v. Aurelien Michel (2023) β "Mutant Ape Planet" NFT Case
Jurisdiction: United States (Eastern District of New York)
Facts:
Michel launched a fake NFT project, Mutant Ape Planet, mimicking the successful Mutant Ape Yacht Club.
He raised over $2.9 million from investors, promising benefits and community rewards.
After the sale, he pulled the rug, never delivering the project, and kept the funds.
Charges:
Wire fraud.
Status:
Arrested and charged in early 2023.
Proceedings ongoing as of latest public records.
Significance:
Classic "rug pull" NFT scam.
Demonstrates law enforcement's increasing international cooperation (Michel was arrested at JFK airport after flying from Dubai).
3. United States v. Le Anh Tuan (2022) β Baller Ape Club Rug Pull
Jurisdiction: United States (DOJ Criminal Division)
Facts:
Tuan launched Baller Ape Club, selling NFTs with promises of returns.
Once the project sold out, he shut down the website and disappeared with $2.6 million in cryptocurrency.
Charges:
Wire fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, money laundering.
Held:
Tuan was indicted along with other NFT and DeFi fraudsters in a sweep of digital asset fraud cases by the DOJ.
Significance:
Emphasized that rug pulls and crypto scams are prosecuted under traditional fraud laws.
Marked part of the DOJ's "largest sweep" targeting NFT and crypto crimes.
4. United States v. Michael Ackerman (2020)
Jurisdiction: United States (Southern District of New York)
Facts:
Ackerman lured investors with a fake cryptocurrency and NFT trading algorithm that he claimed generated huge returns.
Raised $33 million, but used funds for personal luxury expenses.
Charges:
Wire fraud, securities fraud, money laundering.
Held:
Ackerman pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 5 years in prison in 2021.
Significance:
While the case involved broader crypto fraud, it highlighted early NFT-linked investor deception.
Reinforced DOJ's readiness to use securities laws where misleading statements were made.
5. United States v. Andre Llacuna (2023) β "The Frosties" NFT Scam
Jurisdiction: United States (Southern District of New York)
Facts:
Llacuna and accomplices sold Frosties NFTs, promising community benefits, staking rewards, and metaverse plans.
After collecting $1.1 million, they abandoned the project.
Charges:
Wire fraud and conspiracy.
Held:
Llacuna pleaded guilty in late 2023 to fraud charges.
Awaiting sentencing as of last update.
Significance:
First of several "abandon-and-run" NFT scams that received federal attention.
Law enforcement highlighted the case as an example of "fraud in the new digital frontier."
6. United States v. Jeremy Spence a.k.a. "Coin Signals" (2022)
Jurisdiction: United States
Facts:
Though mostly a crypto Ponzi scheme, Spence claimed to invest in crypto and NFTs.
Promised high returns but used new investor funds to pay earlier investors.
Charges:
Securities fraud.
Held:
Sentenced to 42 months in prison in 2022.
Significance:
Showed how NFTs can be used as part of Ponzi schemes.
Demonstrated that intent to defraud is key, regardless of asset class.
π Summary Table
| Case | Type of Fraud | Outcome / Principle |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. v. Chastain (2023) | Insider trading with NFTs | First NFT-related insider trading conviction |
| U.S. v. Michel β Mutant Ape Planet | Rug pull | Ongoing; key example of fake NFT project prosecution |
| U.S. v. Tuan β Baller Ape Club | Rug pull | Indicted; shows rug pulls prosecuted under wire fraud |
| U.S. v. Ackerman | Investment fraud | $33M fraud; sentenced under securities and wire fraud laws |
| U.S. v. Llacuna β Frosties | NFT scam / rug pull | Guilty plea; misrepresentation in digital projects |
| U.S. v. Spence β Coin Signals | NFT as Ponzi vehicle | Sentenced; fraud laws apply regardless of asset |
π§ Legal Takeaways
Existing laws (wire fraud, securities fraud, conspiracy) are sufficient to prosecute NFT-related crimes.
Courts focus on misrepresentation, intent to defraud, and misuse of investor funds.
NFT fraud is often treated like traditional financial fraud, not requiring special statutes.
International coordination is increasing in enforcement due to the borderless nature of crypto/NFT markets.
RELATED Blog
0 comments