Appeals In Criminal Law
๐ Meaning of Appeal in Criminal Law
An appeal in criminal law is a statutory right (not inherent) that allows an accused, the prosecution, or in some jurisdictions, a victim, to approach a higher court to review the judgment, conviction, sentence, or order passed by a lower court.
โ๏ธ Legal Basis of Criminal Appeals in India (for context)
In India, for instance, criminal appeals are governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). Some important sections include:
Section 374 CrPC โ Appeal by convicted person.
Section 377 CrPC โ Appeal for enhancement of sentence by the State.
Section 378 CrPC โ Appeal in case of acquittal.
Section 386 CrPC โ Powers of appellate court.
๐งท Types of Criminal Appeals
Appeal against conviction
Appeal against acquittal
Appeal against sentence
Appeal in cases of insufficient sentence
Appeal by the State
Special Leave to Appeal (SLP) โ Article 136 of the Indian Constitution
๐งโโ๏ธ Key Case Laws on Criminal Appeals (Explained in Detail)
๐น 1. K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra (1962 AIR 605)
๐ Facts:
Commander Nanavati was tried under Section 302 IPC for murdering his wife's lover. The Sessions Court acquitted him. The Bombay High Court reversed the acquittal and convicted him for murder. The case reached the Supreme Court through a special leave petition (SLP).
โ๏ธ Legal Issue:
Whether the appellate court can overturn a judgment of acquittal and convict the accused?
๐งพ Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that:
An appellate court can reverse an acquittal if there are substantial and compelling reasons.
The trial court's judgment must be perverse, unreasonable, or based on misreading of evidence for an appellate court to interfere.
๐ Importance:
This case laid down important principles regarding appeals against acquittals, emphasizing the limited powers of appellate courts in interfering with acquittals.
๐น 2. Bindeshwari Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar (2002) 6 SCC 650
๐ Facts:
The Sessions Court convicted the accused, but the High Court reversed the conviction. The State filed an appeal in the Supreme Court.
โ๏ธ Legal Issue:
Can an appellate court reverse the acquittal based on a reappreciation of evidence?
๐งพ Judgment:
The Supreme Court reiterated that:
Presumption of innocence is strengthened after acquittal by the trial court.
The appellate court must not interfere lightly unless the judgment is manifestly illegal or perverse.
๐ Importance:
Reinforced the double presumption of innocence โ once at trial, and again at acquittal, making it harder for appellate courts to interfere without strong reasons.
๐น 3. Bhagwan Singh v. State of M.P. (2002) 4 SCC 85
๐ Facts:
The trial court acquitted the accused. The High Court reversed the acquittal. The appeal was filed in the Supreme Court.
โ๏ธ Legal Issue:
Whether a High Court can reverse a trial courtโs acquittal without giving cogent reasons?
๐งพ Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that:
The High Court must discuss evidence in detail and record reasons for differing with the trial court.
Failure to do so violates principles of natural justice and Section 378 CrPC.
๐ Importance:
Clarified that reasoned judgments are essential in criminal appeals, especially when acquittals are overturned.
๐น 4. Chandrappa v. State of Karnataka (2007) 4 SCC 415
๐ Facts:
The accused were acquitted by the trial court, but convicted by the High Court in appeal.
โ๏ธ Legal Issue:
What are the principles governing appeals against acquittal?
๐งพ Judgment:
The Supreme Court laid down five key principles:
The appellate court has full power to review evidence.
Presumption of innocence is doubled after acquittal.
Interference is permissible only if the judgment is perverse or wholly unreasonable.
If two views are possible, the one favorable to the accused must be adopted.
The High Court must give compelling reasons to overturn the acquittal.
๐ Importance:
This case is often cited for guidelines on appellate jurisdiction, especially concerning acquittals.
๐น 5. State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006) 12 SCC 254
๐ Facts:
The trial court acquitted the accused; the High Court confirmed it. The State appealed to the Supreme Court.
โ๏ธ Legal Issue:
When can an appellate court interfere with concurrent findings of fact?
๐งพ Judgment:
The Supreme Court held:
If two courts have acquitted the accused, the presumption of innocence becomes very strong.
The Supreme Court will interfere only in rare cases, such as where findings are perverse or grossly unjust.
๐ Importance:
A landmark case regarding the scope of appeals in higher courts (including Supreme Court), especially in second appeals.
๐น 6. Nar Singh v. State of Haryana (2015) 1 SCC 496
๐ Facts:
The accused was convicted by trial court and sentence was upheld by the High Court. He appealed to the Supreme Court claiming misapplication of evidence.
โ๏ธ Legal Issue:
Can the appellate court reappreciate evidence in an appeal against conviction?
๐งพ Judgment:
The Court held:
In an appeal against conviction, the appellate court has wide powers to examine both facts and law.
However, benefit of doubt must go to the accused if any reasonable doubt exists.
๐ Importance:
Clarified the scope of appeal against conviction and power of courts to reanalyze evidence.
๐ Key Takeaways on Criminal Appeals
| Point | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Right to Appeal | Not automatic; must be provided by statute |
| Scope of Review | Varies with type of appeal (conviction, acquittal, sentence) |
| Presumption of Innocence | Strengthens after acquittal โ appellate courts interfere only on strong grounds |
| Reappreciation of Evidence | Permitted in appeal against conviction, but not lightly in acquittal |
| Appellate Court Powers | Can confirm, reverse, modify, or order retrial |
RELATED Blog
0 comments