Workplace Safety Criminal Prosecutions
1. United States v. Kerr-McGee Oil Industries (1993)
Background: Kerr-McGee, an oil and gas company, was prosecuted under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) after a series of explosions at its refinery in Oklahoma caused multiple worker injuries and one death.
Violation: Failure to maintain equipment properly, inadequate safety training, and ignoring OSHA warnings.
Outcome: The company pled guilty to criminal charges of willful OSHA violations and paid over $10 million in fines, and several executives faced probation.
Significance: Demonstrated that companies can face criminal liability for systemic safety neglect leading to worker deaths, not just civil penalties.
2. BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Case (2010)
Background: The explosion on the Deepwater Horizon oil rig killed 11 workers and injured many others.
Violation: Investigations revealed that BP and contractor Halliburton ignored safety protocols and failed to follow industry standards for blowout preventers and cementing operations.
Outcome: BP pled guilty to manslaughter, environmental, and safety violations, resulting in $4.5 billion in criminal fines. Halliburton and Transocean faced criminal charges as well.
Significance: This is one of the largest criminal workplace safety cases in U.S. history, highlighting corporate accountability for unsafe work environments in high-risk industries.
3. United States v. Tesla, Inc. (2018)
Background: Tesla faced prosecution after reports of repeated serious workplace injuries at its Fremont factory, including amputations and unsafe machinery conditions.
Violation: Willful OSHA violations, inadequate employee safety training, and failure to report injuries properly.
Outcome: Tesla reached a settlement with OSHA, agreeing to enhanced safety procedures, employee training, and civil penalties. While criminal charges were not fully pursued against the corporation, the case created intense scrutiny.
Significance: Highlighted how modern tech manufacturing workplaces could face criminal exposure for unsafe labor practices.
4. Imperial Sugar Company Explosion (2008)
Background: A massive sugar dust explosion at the Imperial Sugar refinery in Georgia killed 14 workers and injured dozens.
Violation: Poor housekeeping, failure to implement proper dust control, and ignoring known hazards in industrial sugar dust operations.
Outcome: OSHA charged the company with willful safety violations, resulting in criminal penalties, fines totaling $8 million, and executive indictments.
Significance: Emphasized that repetitive safety violations in industrial processing environments could lead to both civil and criminal penalties.
5. United States v. BP America, Texas City Refinery (2005)
Background: Explosion at the Texas City refinery killed 15 workers and injured 180.
Violation: Safety violations included poor equipment maintenance, ignored hazard warnings, and inadequate employee training.
Outcome: BP pled guilty to willful OSHA violations and paid a criminal fine of $50 million.
Significance: Reinforced that even large multinational corporations cannot avoid criminal responsibility when ignoring repeated safety warnings.
6. United States v. C&L Aviation (2012)
Background: C&L Aviation operated a maintenance facility for small aircraft. Workers were repeatedly exposed to toxic chemicals without protective equipment.
Violation: Willful OSHA violations, including failure to provide personal protective equipment and failure to follow chemical handling protocols.
Outcome: The company pled guilty to criminal charges, and managers were sentenced to probation and fines.
Significance: Demonstrated that even smaller companies face criminal liability when ignoring clear workplace safety regulations.
Key Takeaways from Workplace Safety Prosecutions
Criminal liability can arise from willful neglect, repeated OSHA violations, or ignoring known hazards.
Executives and managers may face individual accountability if they knowingly endanger workers.
High-risk industries (oil, chemical, sugar processing, construction) are particularly scrutinized.
Penalties can include fines, probation, imprisonment, and mandatory safety improvements.
These cases reinforce the principle that profit cannot override worker safety, legally or ethically.
RELATED Blog
0 comments