Mafia Prosecutions In Usa
Overview: Mafia Prosecutions in the USA
The U.S. government has long targeted organized crime groups known collectively as the “Mafia” or La Cosa Nostra. These groups engaged in racketeering, extortion, murder, loan sharking, drug trafficking, and corruption. Prosecutions often relied on the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), enacted in 1970, which allows leaders to be prosecuted for crimes they ordered others to commit.
1. United States v. Luciano (1936)
📝 Facts:
Charles “Lucky” Luciano was a powerful mob boss who reorganized New York Mafia families into the modern commission system. He was charged with compulsory prostitution and pandering but his influence extended far beyond.
⚖️ Legal Issues:
Prosecuted mainly for running a large-scale prostitution racket.
Convicted based on testimony from insiders and victims.
✅ Outcome:
Luciano sentenced to 30-50 years in prison but was released early due to his cooperation with U.S. government during WWII (helping with the Navy’s port security).
His conviction marked one of the first major federal successes against the Mafia.
📌 Significance:
Set the stage for federal efforts to dismantle organized crime.
Showed that prosecuting mob bosses on traditional crimes was possible, though limited.
2. United States v. Genovese (1959)
📝 Facts:
Vito Genovese, a leading mob boss, was implicated in the murder of rival mobster Frank Costello and various racketeering activities.
⚖️ Legal Issues:
Prosecuted for drug trafficking and murder conspiracy.
Witness intimidation and the “code of silence” (Omertà) complicated evidence gathering.
✅ Outcome:
Genovese was convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to 15 years.
Murder charges never formally prosecuted due to lack of witnesses.
📌 Significance:
First major conviction of a Mafia boss on drug trafficking.
Highlighted difficulties in prosecuting violent crimes without witness cooperation.
3. United States v. Gambino Crime Family (1986)
📝 Facts:
The Gambino family, led by Paul Castellano and later John Gotti, were charged with a range of racketeering crimes including extortion, loan sharking, and murder.
⚖️ Legal Issues:
Prosecuted under the RICO Act for patterns of criminal activity.
The government relied heavily on informants and wiretaps.
✅ Outcome:
Castellano was assassinated in 1985 (ordered by Gotti).
Gotti was acquitted in 1987 due to jury tampering but later convicted in 1992 on racketeering and murder charges.
📌 Significance:
The case marked the rise and fall of John Gotti, the notorious “Teflon Don.”
Demonstrated the challenges in prosecuting mob bosses known for intimidation and corruption.
4. United States v. Anthony “Gaspipe” Casso (1994)
📝 Facts:
Casso was the underboss of the Lucchese family, involved in multiple murders, drug trafficking, and extortion.
⚖️ Legal Issues:
Faced charges under RICO for violent crimes and narcotics trafficking.
Eventually became an informant to avoid the death penalty.
✅ Outcome:
Pleaded guilty and cooperated extensively with the government.
His testimony led to dozens of other prosecutions.
Sentenced to 455 years but received a reduced term due to cooperation.
📌 Significance:
His cooperation marked a major breakthrough in breaking the code of silence.
Helped dismantle multiple Mafia operations.
5. United States v. John Gotti (1992)
📝 Facts:
John Gotti, the Gambino family boss, was tried for racketeering, murder, and conspiracy, after years of evading conviction.
⚖️ Legal Issues:
Prosecutors used recorded conversations and the testimony of former associates.
The key challenge was overcoming witness intimidation and jury tampering.
✅ Outcome:
Gotti was convicted on all counts and sentenced to life imprisonment.
His conviction marked the fall of one of the most infamous Mafia bosses.
📌 Significance:
Demonstrated the effectiveness of electronic surveillance and informants.
Marked a turning point in the federal government’s fight against organized crime.
6. United States v. Philadelphia Crime Family (The Scarfo Trial, 1989)
📝 Facts:
Nicodemo “Little Nicky” Scarfo led the Philadelphia crime family during a violent period marked by multiple murders and drug operations.
⚖️ Legal Issues:
Charged with racketeering, murder, extortion, and illegal gambling.
Used RICO to link crimes to Scarfo’s leadership.
✅ Outcome:
Scarfo was convicted and sentenced to 55 years in prison.
Prosecution succeeded despite the violent reputation and community intimidation.
📌 Significance:
One of the first times the government dismantled a Mafia family through RICO.
Highlighted the violent internal conflicts within the Mafia.
7. United States v. Genovese Crime Family (The Commission Trial, 1985-1986)
📝 Facts:
The “Commission” trial targeted leaders of the five New York Mafia families accused of running a criminal enterprise controlling racketeering in the city.
⚖️ Legal Issues:
Charged under RICO with conspiracy to commit murder, extortion, and illegal gambling.
Relied on extensive wiretaps, informants (including Joe Valachi), and financial records.
✅ Outcome:
Several bosses and underbosses were convicted.
The trial crippled the Mafia’s control over NYC crime.
📌 Significance:
Landmark case showing RICO’s power in prosecuting entire criminal organizations.
Major blow to the Mafia’s operational capabilities.
Key Legal Themes Across Mafia Prosecutions
| Legal Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| RICO Act | Allowed prosecution of leaders for crimes committed by subordinates. |
| Use of Informants | Turning insiders was crucial to break the Omertà code. |
| Wiretaps & Surveillance | Technological evidence helped overcome witness intimidation. |
| Witness Protection | Vital for securing testimony from former mobsters. |
| Organizational Conspiracy | Criminal liability extends beyond direct perpetrators to leaders. |
RELATED Blog
0 comments