Animal Rights Extremist Crimes Prosecutions
1. Mel Broughton – UK Petrol Bomb Plot Against Oxford University
Background:
Mel Broughton was a prominent animal rights activist opposing the construction of a new animal testing laboratory at Oxford University. He and associates planned to damage university property to halt the project.
What happened:
In 2006 and 2007, petrol bombs were planted at two Oxford University sites connected to the laboratory. One bomb exploded and caused significant damage; the other failed to detonate. Police found evidence linking Broughton to the devices, including DNA on bomb components, materials for making bombs, and a list of other potential targets.
Legal Charges:
Broughton was charged with conspiracy to commit arson, possession of explosive substances with intent to endanger life, and related offenses.
Outcome:
After two trials, Broughton was convicted of conspiracy to commit arson and sentenced to 10 years in prison.
Significance:
This case demonstrates that when animal rights activism crosses into violent tactics such as bomb-making and arson, it is treated as serious criminal conduct. It marked a clear boundary between lawful protest and illegal extremist actions threatening public safety.
2. SHAC Campaign (Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty) – UK Blackmail Conspiracy
Background:
SHAC was an activist campaign targeting Huntingdon Life Sciences, a contract animal testing company, aiming to shut it down by pressuring not just the company but its business associates.
What happened:
The campaign used tactics including threats, harassment, sending abusive mail (like used sanitary towels), hoax bomb threats, and publicizing personal information to intimidate employees and business partners.
Legal Charges:
Several leaders and key participants were charged with conspiracy to blackmail and harassment.
Outcome:
Several were convicted and received prison sentences ranging from four to eleven years.
Significance:
The SHAC case is an example of how persistent intimidation tactics used under the guise of activism can cross into criminal conspiracy. It highlights how the law differentiates between legitimate protest and illegal threats designed to coerce businesses or individuals.
3. Joseph Buddenberg and Nicole Kissane – US Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act Violation
Background:
Buddenberg and Kissane were animal rights activists involved in releasing thousands of mink from fur farms and sabotaging fur industry property.
What happened:
Their actions damaged property and interfered with the operations of animal enterprises. The activists saw this as rescuing animals but the law saw it as criminal interference.
Legal Charges:
They were charged under the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (AETA), a U.S. federal law targeting those who damage or disrupt animal enterprises.
Outcome:
Both pleaded guilty. Buddenberg received a prison sentence and was ordered to pay restitution for damages caused.
Significance:
This case shows the U.S. government’s approach to animal rights extremism through laws like the AETA, which seek to protect businesses and research institutions from disruptive, illegal activities—even when motivated by activism.
4. United States v. Johnson and Lang – US Case on AETA and Free Speech
Background:
Johnson and Lang were activists charged with releasing mink and foxes from fur farms and vandalizing property.
What happened:
They spray-painted slogans and engaged in direct action against fur farms to protest animal cruelty.
Legal Charges:
Prosecuted under the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act for property damage and interference.
Outcome:
Their convictions were upheld by the appellate court, which ruled the AETA was constitutional and did not violate free speech rights.
Significance:
This case clarifies the balance between First Amendment rights and criminal liability in cases of direct action. While peaceful protest is protected, acts involving property destruction and unlawful interference with businesses can be prosecuted without violating constitutional protections.
RELATED Blog
0 comments