Live-In Relationships And Criminal Liability
What is a Live-In Relationship?
A live-in relationship refers to an arrangement where two unmarried individuals live together in a long-term relationship resembling marriage without officially registering it. These relationships have gained social acceptance but still face legal and criminal scrutiny.
Legal Status of Live-In Relationships
In India and several jurisdictions, live-in relationships are not illegal per se.
The Supreme Court of India has recognized live-in relationships as a legitimate personal choice in various judgments.
However, such relationships do attract legal attention when issues like dowry harassment, domestic violence, maintenance, or sexual offences arise.
Criminal Liability Concerns in Live-In Relationships
Dowry Prohibition Act: Courts have examined whether the dowry laws apply to live-in relationships.
Domestic Violence Act: Protection may extend to partners in live-in relationships.
Rape and Sexual Assault: Criminal liability can arise if sexual acts are non-consensual.
Maintenance and Abandonment: Live-in partners may seek maintenance under certain conditions.
Moral Policing and Public Order: Sometimes live-in relationships face harassment or criminal complaints for perceived immorality or public order.
Case Laws on Live-In Relationships and Criminal Liability
1. Indra Sarma v. V.K.V. Sarma (2013) – Supreme Court of India
Facts: The court examined the legal status of live-in relationships and conditions under which they could be recognized.
Holding: The court held that live-in relationships can be legitimate if they are conducted in good faith and are stable, long-term relationships akin to marriage.
Criminal Aspect: The court made it clear that live-in relationships do not violate any criminal law, but protections such as maintenance and domestic violence can apply if the relationship is akin to marriage.
Significance: Established guidelines on when a live-in relationship can be considered “relationship in the nature of marriage” for legal protections.
2. D. Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal (2010) – Supreme Court of India
Facts: Velusamy claimed a live-in relationship with Patchaiammal and sought recognition of their relationship and maintenance.
Holding: The court ruled that live-in relationships must fulfill certain conditions to be protected under laws like the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act.
Criminal Liability Aspect: It was clarified that criminal laws like dowry harassment would apply only if the live-in relationship is akin to marriage and there is evidence of coercion or harassment.
Significance: Clarified the scope of criminal liability and protection under domestic violence laws for live-in partners.
3. Lily Thomas v. Union of India (2000) – Supreme Court of India
Though primarily a case on disqualification of MPs, this case had important dicta about social morality and constitutional values related to personal liberty.
Relevance to Live-In Relationships: It emphasized the right to privacy and personal liberty, implicitly supporting the right to choose relationships, live-in or otherwise, free from arbitrary criminalization.
Criminal Liability Aspect: Showcased that consensual adult relationships should not attract criminal sanctions merely on moral grounds.
4. S. Khushboo v. Kanniammal (2010) – Supreme Court of India
Facts: Khushboo faced criminal charges for statements defending live-in relationships and premarital sex.
Holding: The court held that consensual adult relationships are protected under the right to life and personal liberty (Article 21) and cannot be criminalized simply because they offend societal morality.
Significance: Reinforced that criminal laws cannot be used to punish live-in relationships or consensual adult behavior.
5. Gurpreet Kaur v. State of Punjab (2020) – Punjab and Haryana High Court
Facts: The petitioner sought protection against criminal proceedings alleging adultery and harassment, arising out of a live-in relationship.
Holding: The court held that live-in relationships are not illegal and adultery laws cannot be used to harass partners in such relationships.
Criminal Liability Aspect: Highlighted misuse of criminal laws like adultery (now decriminalized in India) to intimidate live-in partners.
Significance: Showed courts protecting rights of live-in partners from frivolous criminal complaints.
6. Vinod Kumar v. Union of India (2014) – Delhi High Court
Facts: The petitioner challenged police harassment and criminal complaints lodged against live-in partners.
Holding: The court ruled that live-in partners are entitled to protection under the law and arbitrary police action or moral policing is illegal.
Significance: Protected live-in couples from police harassment and misuse of criminal provisions meant for married couples.
Summary
Live-in relationships in many jurisdictions, particularly India, are not criminal offenses.
However, criminal liability can arise in live-in relationships concerning dowry harassment, domestic violence, sexual assault, maintenance claims, and moral policing.
Courts have consistently ruled in favor of protecting rights of adults in consensual live-in relationships, preventing misuse of criminal laws.
Several landmark cases have clarified when criminal laws apply and how legal protections like maintenance and domestic violence provisions extend to live-in partners.
The judiciary balances personal liberty, privacy, and protection against abuse in these cases.
RELATED Blog
0 comments