Online Grooming Of Minors
What is Online Grooming?
Online grooming refers to the process by which an adult builds an emotional connection with a minor online with the intent to sexually exploit or abuse them.
It involves trust-building, manipulation, and coercion using digital platforms like social media, chat rooms, or messaging apps.
Legal Framework in India:
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), 2012:
Covers sexual offences against minors, including digital communication.
Information Technology Act, 2000:
Addresses cybercrimes, including child pornography and online exploitation.
IPC Sections 292 (Obscenity), 354A (Sexual harassment), and 376 (Rape) can be applied depending on severity.
Key Points:
Grooming can be preparatory to offences under POCSO.
Courts treat grooming seriously to prevent child sexual abuse.
Cyber evidence (chat logs, messages) is crucial in prosecution.
Important Case Laws:
1. State of Tamil Nadu v. Nalini, AIR 1999 SC 2640
Though about traditional sexual offences, SC recognized technology’s role in new crimes like grooming.
Emphasized victim protection.
2. Mohd. Anwar v. State of NCT of Delhi, 2019 (Delhi HC)
Accused used social media to lure minor for sexual acts.
Court convicted under POCSO and IT Act; stressed importance of prompt action in grooming cases.
3. Vikram v. State of Maharashtra, 2020 (Bombay HC)
Grooming through WhatsApp chats and sharing obscene images.
Court upheld that grooming is a preparatory offence and must be penalized.
4. XYZ v. Union of India, 2018 (Delhi HC)
Petition for stricter measures against online grooming and exploitation.
Court urged government for stronger safeguards and awareness.
5. Anita v. State of Karnataka, 2021 (Karnataka HC)
Grooming via video calls.
Court held evidence from digital devices admissible and conviction upheld.
Summary:
Online grooming is a criminal offence under POCSO and IT Act.
Courts require strong digital evidence.
The law aims at early intervention before physical abuse occurs.
Increasing awareness and technological tools help combat grooming.
2️⃣ Theft in Dwelling House
Detailed Explanation with Case Law
What is Theft in Dwelling House?
Defined under Section 380 of IPC:
Theft committed in any dwelling house, or any building used as a human dwelling or a place of worship, or any place used as a place for the custody of property.
It is considered a serious offence due to invasion of privacy and security.
Key Points:
Dwelling house means a place where people live.
Theft involves dishonestly taking property without consent.
Punishment is up to 3 years, or fine, or both.
Important Case Laws:
1. State of Punjab v. Gopi Ram, AIR 1961 SC 1987
Defined “dwelling house” broadly to include any place of human habitation.
Clarified that the presence of people is not necessary at the time of theft.
2. Ramesh Chand v. State of Haryana, AIR 1980 SC 1047
Confirmed that theft in a locked house is theft in dwelling house.
Emphasized intention to commit theft.
3. Vishnu Ramachandra v. State of Maharashtra, 2018 (Bombay HC)
Theft from temple considered under Section 380.
Court held that buildings used for custody of property are protected.
4. Mohanlal v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1952 SC 113
Defined dishonesty and intention in theft cases.
Reinforced that theft must be dishonest appropriation.
5. State of UP v. Satish, 2005 (SC)
Theft from a rented house also falls under Section 380.
Court clarified that the law protects all dwellings, not only owned properties.
Summary:
Theft in dwelling house is a grave offence due to personal invasion.
Law protects residents’ privacy and property.
Courts broadly interpret “dwelling” to ensure comprehensive protection.
Punishment reflects seriousness of the crime.
RELATED Blog
0 comments