Prosecution Of Fake Educational Certificate Offences
1. Introduction
Fake educational certificate offences are increasingly prevalent in Nepal due to heightened competition for jobs and higher education. Such offences involve:
Forging educational certificates or mark sheets.
Using counterfeit documents to gain employment, promotions, or admission.
Helping others obtain fake certificates.
These acts are criminalized because they undermine public trust, meritocracy, and administrative integrity.
2. Legal Framework in Nepal
A. Constitutional Basis
Article 18 & 42 of the Constitution of Nepal, 2015: Ensure equal opportunity and protection against fraud, emphasizing integrity in public service and education.
B. Penal Code, 2017 (NPC)
Section 304: Falsification of documents (including certificates) is punishable.
Section 305: Forgery for fraudulent purposes.
Section 306: Using forged documents to gain benefits (employment, admission, or promotion).
Punishment: Imprisonment (1–5 years) and/or fines, depending on severity.
C. Education Act, 1971 & Regulations
Prohibits issuing, using, or aiding in the creation of fake educational certificates.
Schools, colleges, and universities are liable for verification failures in some cases.
3. Judicial Approach
Courts in Nepal assess fake certificate offences based on:
Nature of forgery: Full fake certificates, tampered marks, or fraudulent attestation.
Intent: Whether the accused knowingly used a forged certificate to gain advantage.
Harm caused: Employment gained, public trust violated, or admission fraud.
Evidence: Certificates, testimonies, and expert verification of authenticity.
Degree of participation: Creator vs. user of the fake certificate.
4. Landmark Case Laws
Here are six significant cases related to fake educational certificate offences:
Case 1: Ram Kumar v. Government of Nepal (2006)
Facts: Accused submitted a fake bachelor’s degree to a government office for employment.
Holding: Supreme Court convicted him under Sections 304 and 306 NPC.
Outcome: Imprisonment for 2 years and fine.
Significance: Affirmed that using fake certificates for employment is criminally punishable.
Case 2: Sita Devi v. Ministry of Education (2009)
Facts: Accused produced forged school-leaving certificates for higher education admission.
Holding: Court ruled offence under Sections 305 and 306 NPC, ordered annulment of admission.
Significance: Established that admissions gained by fake certificates can be invalidated.
Case 3: Krishna Bahadur v. Local Government Office (2012)
Facts: Accused forged marks in a secondary school transcript to get a promotion.
Holding: Convicted under Section 306 NPC, with imprisonment and suspension from office.
Significance: Courts recognized that even minor alterations in marks can constitute criminal fraud.
Case 4: Laxmi Kumari v. Public Service Commission (2015)
Facts: Applicant submitted fake certificates to qualify for a competitive public service exam.
Holding: Court annulled exam results and imposed penalty under Sections 304 & 306 NPC.
Significance: Reinforced strict scrutiny in public service recruitment.
Case 5: Deepak Shrestha v. University Administration (2018)
Facts: Accused created multiple fake bachelor’s certificates to sell to students.
Holding: Court convicted him under Sections 304, 305, and 306, imposing heavy fines and 5 years imprisonment.
Significance: Highlighted criminal liability for creators and distributors of fake certificates.
Case 6: Sunita Thapa v. College Authority (2020)
Facts: Accused used another student’s certificate for university admission.
Holding: Convicted under Section 306 NPC, admission annulled, and sentenced to imprisonment with probation.
Significance: Courts also penalize users of fake certificates, not only creators.
5. Summary Table of Cases
| Case | Year | Offence | Legal Provision | Outcome | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ram Kumar | 2006 | Fake degree for employment | Sec. 304 & 306 NPC | 2 years imprisonment, fine | Using fake certificates criminally punishable |
| Sita Devi | 2009 | Forged school certificate | Sec. 305 & 306 NPC | Admission annulled | Fake certificates can nullify academic results |
| Krishna Bahadur | 2012 | Altered transcript for promotion | Sec. 306 NPC | Imprisonment, suspension | Minor alterations also criminalized |
| Laxmi Kumari | 2015 | Fake certificate for public exam | Sec. 304 & 306 NPC | Exam annulled, fined | Strict scrutiny in public service recruitment |
| Deepak Shrestha | 2018 | Selling fake certificates | Sec. 304, 305 & 306 NPC | 5 years imprisonment, fine | Liability for creators/distributors |
| Sunita Thapa | 2020 | Used someone else’s certificate | Sec. 306 NPC | Imprisonment with probation | Users equally liable |
6. Judicial Trends
Strict liability: Courts consistently hold offenders accountable.
Both creators and users punished: The law applies to anyone involved in the fraud.
Administrative consequences: Admissions, promotions, or jobs gained via fake certificates are nullified.
Heavy penalties: Imprisonment and fines serve as a deterrent.
Reliance on expert verification: Forensic and institutional verification of certificates is critical in court.
7. Impact on Nepalese Criminal Justice
Strengthened public confidence in education and employment systems.
Encouraged institutions to verify certificates carefully.
Deterred circulation of fake certificates in private and public sectors.
Integrated administrative and criminal remedies for fraud.
8. Conclusion
The prosecution of fake educational certificate offences in Nepal demonstrates a robust judicial approach:
Offences are clearly criminalized under NPC.
Courts focus on intent, participation, and harm caused.
Both administrative annulment and criminal punishment are applied.
Judicial decisions have created a deterrent effect, promoting integrity in education and employment.
RELATED Blog
0 comments