Research On Tourism Industry And Wildlife Crime In Nepal
1. Rhino Horn Smuggling via Butwal Tourism Hub (2020)
Facts:
In Butwal, a hotel operating near a transit hub was discovered as part of a network smuggling rhino horns and musk deer glands. Investigations revealed that poachers were using tourism-related infrastructure, including hotels and transport services, to conceal and transport wildlife products across the border.
Legal Issues:
Violation of the National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act, 1973 (NPWCA), for illegal trade and transport of protected species.
Use of tourism infrastructure to facilitate wildlife crime.
Outcome:
Several individuals arrested, including hotel staff and transport agents.
Confiscation of rhino horn and other wildlife parts.
Fines imposed on facilitators; prison terms for the main traffickers.
Significance:
Highlighted the role of tourism hubs in wildlife crime logistics.
Showed the need for awareness and regulation of hotels and transport facilities near protected areas.
2. Tiger Bone Trafficking in Bardiya National Park (2015–2016)
Facts:
An individual was arrested in Bardiya with a tiger hide and 47 tiger bones intended for trafficking. The case involved poaching inside the national park and using tourism routes for illegal export.
Legal Issues:
NPWCA violation: trade and possession of endangered species.
Role of tourism corridors in facilitating movement of illegal wildlife products.
Outcome:
Convicted by the district court; sentenced to 5 years imprisonment and fined.
High Court upheld the conviction.
Significance:
Set a precedent for criminal liability in wildlife trafficking.
Showed tourism corridors can inadvertently support illegal wildlife trade.
3. Private Possession of Wildlife Parts (Supreme Court Case, 2023)
Facts:
A writ petition challenged the government’s failure to act against private individuals displaying or possessing wildlife body parts (tiger pelts, rhino horns) in private collections, often as a part of tourism décor in lodges and resorts.
Legal Issues:
NPWCA prohibits private possession of scheduled species without authorization.
Tourism industry implications: displaying wildlife parts for tourist attraction can violate law.
Outcome:
Supreme Court ordered seizure and declaration of all private wildlife collections.
Imposed accountability even on elite individuals previously enjoying impunity.
Significance:
Reinforced criminal accountability for private possession and tourism-based wildlife displays.
Strengthened enforcement standards for resorts and hotels.
4. Poaching Surge During COVID-19 Tourism Slowdown (2020)
Facts:
With tourism restricted during the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a marked increase in poaching in Chitwan and Bardiya National Parks. Local tourism workers and others engaged in poaching as livelihoods collapsed.
Legal Issues:
NPWCA violations: poaching, hunting, and illegal trade of endangered species.
Indirect link to tourism decline: economic dependency on tourism created vulnerability to wildlife crime.
Outcome:
Hundreds of cases recorded; several arrests made.
Local enforcement highlighted the need for integrating tourism stakeholders in conservation efforts.
Significance:
Demonstrated how tourism industry fluctuations can impact wildlife crime rates.
Showed necessity for tourism-related economic safety nets to prevent poaching.
5. Hotels Inside Chitwan National Park Facilitating Crime (2009–2012)
Facts:
Several hotels and lodges operated inside Chitwan National Park until 2012. Investigations revealed that some were connected to poaching and illegal wildlife trade. Their presence also disrupted wildlife habitats.
Legal Issues:
NPWCA and park regulations prohibit permanent commercial operations in core zones.
Facilitation of poaching through tourism infrastructure.
Outcome:
Government decided to close and not renew leases for all hotels within the park.
Some operators faced criminal investigations for their indirect role in wildlife crime.
Significance:
Demonstrated direct conflict between tourism development and wildlife protection.
Highlighted the risk of tourism infrastructure facilitating illegal wildlife activity.
6. Elephant Tourism and Wildlife Risk (Sauraha, Chitwan)
Facts:
Elephant-based tourism in buffer zones around Chitwan National Park sometimes led to human-wildlife conflict. Female elephants used in tourism attracted wild elephants, which created opportunities for poachers to access wildlife.
Legal Issues:
Animal welfare concerns under NPWCA and related laws.
Indirect facilitation of wildlife crime due to tourism practices.
Outcome:
Ethical tourism guidelines developed; some operations were suspended or restructured.
Awareness campaigns for tourism operators to prevent illegal access to wildlife.
Significance:
Highlighted indirect ways tourism can facilitate wildlife crime.
Showed the importance of ethical tourism practices in conservation areas.
Key Legal and Policy Takeaways
Tourism infrastructure, such as hotels and transport hubs, can inadvertently facilitate wildlife crime.
Wildlife crime prosecutions involve the NPWCA and related penal provisions, often with fines and imprisonment.
Tourism downturns, such as during COVID-19, can increase poaching risk.
Hotels, lodges, and resorts must comply with conservation regulations, avoiding facilitation of illegal wildlife trade.
Ethical and sustainable tourism practices are essential to prevent indirect support of wildlife crime.
RELATED Blog
0 comments