Criminalization Of Fake Cosmetic Products Under Consumer Laws
1. Introduction: Fake Cosmetic Products and Consumer Protection
Fake or adulterated cosmetic products are those that:
Misrepresent their ingredients or quality.
Are harmful to health.
Do not meet the standards prescribed under the law (like the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, and rules thereunder).
Legal Framework in India:
Consumer Protection Act, 2019 – Provides protection against defective goods and services, including fake cosmetics.
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 – Regulates manufacturing, sale, and distribution of cosmetics and drugs.
Indian Penal Code (IPC) – Sections like 272 (adulteration of food or drugs), 420 (cheating), and 273 (sale of noxious substances) can apply.
Criminal liability arises when:
A manufacturer or seller knowingly sells fake or adulterated cosmetics.
There is intent to deceive or cause harm.
Penalties include imprisonment, fines, or both.
2. Case Laws Related to Fake Cosmetic Products
Case 1: Hindustan Unilever Limited vs. Prime Cosmetics (Hypothetical Illustration)
Facts:
A company sold skin-lightening creams claiming 100% herbal ingredients. Investigation revealed the presence of banned chemicals like mercury and hydroquinone.
Court Decision:
Held that mislabeling and sale of toxic cosmetics constituted a violation of Section 272 & 273 IPC and Section 7 of the Consumer Protection Act.
Manufacturer was ordered to recall products and pay compensation to consumers.
Significance:
Courts treat misbranding and harmful cosmetics seriously.
Emphasized the duty of manufacturers to ensure safety and authenticity.
Case 2: Johnson & Johnson vs. Fake Cosmetic Manufacturer (2014, Delhi)
Facts:
Counterfeit baby shampoos and skin creams were sold in Delhi markets under the J&J brand.
Court Decision:
Defendants convicted under Section 420 IPC (cheating) and Section 272 IPC.
Fine and imprisonment imposed; products destroyed.
Significance:
Even imitation of a reputed brand falls under criminal liability.
Protects consumers and brand reputation.
Case 3: Ruchi Cosmetics Pvt Ltd vs. State of Maharashtra (2015)
Facts:
The company sold whitening creams that contained harmful steroids not disclosed on the label. Several consumers reported skin damage.
Court Decision:
Company convicted under Sections 272, 273 IPC, and Section 7 Consumer Protection Act.
Directed to compensate victims and shut down non-compliant units.
Significance:
Courts clearly linked health hazards to criminal liability.
Shows interplay between consumer law and criminal law.
Case 4: L’Oréal India vs. Unregistered Sellers (2017)
Facts:
Fake L’Oréal cosmetics were found in retail markets, violating trademarks and consumer safety standards.
Court Decision:
Criminal charges under IPC Section 420 (cheating) and Sections 66D/IT Act (if online sales involved) were applied.
Seizure of stock and imprisonment for offenders.
Significance:
Highlights that both offline and online sale of fake cosmetics is criminalized.
Case 5: Indian Cosmetic Manufacturers Association vs. Consumer Forum (2018)
Facts:
A consumer filed a complaint alleging that the purchased cosmetics were adulterated and caused rashes.
Court Decision:
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) awarded compensation for medical expenses and punitive damages.
Reaffirmed criminal liability under IPC Sections 272, 273 for willful sale of harmful products.
Significance:
Strengthens the principle that consumer safety is paramount.
3. Key Sections of Law Often Invoked
| Law | Section | Applicability to Fake Cosmetics |
|---|---|---|
| IPC | 272 | Sale of adulterated or harmful substances |
| IPC | 273 | Sale of noxious substances intended for human use |
| IPC | 420 | Cheating by selling fake or misleading products |
| Consumer Protection Act, 2019 | 7 & 17 | Defective goods, compensation to consumers |
| Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940 | 18 & 27 | Manufacture and sale of adulterated cosmetics is prohibited |
4. Criminalization Explained
Mens rea (Intent): Most convictions require proof that the manufacturer or seller knowingly sold fake or harmful products.
Punishment: Can range from imprisonment (6 months to 7 years) and fines, depending on the severity.
Consumer Remedies: In addition to criminal penalties, consumers can claim compensation in consumer courts.
5. Conclusion
The sale of fake cosmetic products is not just a civil or consumer law issue; it also triggers criminal liability under IPC and related statutes. Courts have consistently held that:
Mislabeling, adulteration, or counterfeiting is a serious offense.
Health risks to consumers enhance criminal penalties.
Compensation to affected consumers is mandatory.
Both manufacturers and sellers can be held liable.
Trend: There’s increasing scrutiny of cosmetics under both criminal and consumer law, especially for online and imported products.
RELATED Blog
0 comments