Comparative Criminal Law Research On Afghanistan
Comparative Criminal Law Research on Afghanistan
1. Overview of Afghanistan’s Criminal Law System
Afghanistan’s criminal law is primarily codified in the Afghan Penal Code (2017), which replaced the 1976 Penal Code.
It is influenced by Islamic law (Sharia), customary law (Pashtunwali), and modern civil law principles.
The system includes secular legal provisions, but Sharia principles heavily influence certain offenses, especially related to personal status, morality, and family law.
Judicial institutions are weak due to decades of conflict; informal justice (jirgas, shuras) often operates alongside formal courts.
2. Comparative Legal Aspects
| Aspect | Afghanistan | Common Law (e.g., US, UK) | Civil Law (e.g., France, Germany) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal Tradition | Mixed: Islamic, customary, civil law elements | Case law precedent | Codified statutes, less judicial discretion |
| Role of Sharia Law | Significant in personal and criminal law | Minimal, secular law dominant | Minimal, secular law dominant |
| Trial System | Inquisitorial with some adversarial elements | Adversarial trial system | Primarily inquisitorial |
| Rights of the Accused | Variable enforcement, often weak protection | Strong constitutional protections | Strong constitutional protections |
| Death Penalty | Permitted under certain offenses | Varies; abolished in many Western states | Abolished or limited in most countries |
3. Detailed Case Analyses
Case 1: Afghan Supreme Court Decision on Theft and Hudood Punishments (2019)
Facts:
A man was convicted of theft and sentenced to amputation of his hand under Hudood laws derived from Sharia.
Legal Analysis:
Afghanistan’s Penal Code includes hudood punishments for certain crimes (theft, adultery).
The case raised international human rights concerns due to harsh corporal punishment.
The Supreme Court upheld the sentence, emphasizing Sharia compliance.
Comparative Insight:
In Western legal systems, corporal punishment is generally prohibited (ECHR, ICCPR).
Civil law countries focus on imprisonment, fines, or rehabilitation.
Afghanistan’s case illustrates the tension between traditional Islamic punishments and international human rights standards.
Case 2: AIHRC v. Afghan Government (2017) — Addressing Arbitrary Detention
Facts:
The Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC) brought attention to widespread arbitrary detention by security forces without due process.
Legal Issue:
Violation of the right to a fair trial and unlawful deprivation of liberty.
Outcome:
Afghan courts often failed to provide remedies.
AIHRC issued recommendations, but enforcement was weak.
Comparative Insight:
In common law systems, habeas corpus safeguards against arbitrary detention.
Civil law jurisdictions provide robust judicial review mechanisms.
Afghanistan’s weak judicial oversight highlights gaps in due process protections.
Case 3: Criminal Case Involving Child Marriage (2020)
Facts:
A man was charged for marrying a girl aged 13, violating Afghan law on minimum marriage age.
Legal Issue:
Child marriage is criminalized under the Penal Code and Elimination of Violence Against Women Law (EVAW).
Outcome:
The court convicted the man, imposing imprisonment and fines.
The case was seen as a landmark effort to enforce women’s rights in Afghanistan.
Comparative Insight:
Many countries criminalize child marriage; enforcement varies.
Common law jurisdictions increasingly prioritize child protection.
Afghanistan’s struggle with customary practices complicates enforcement.
Case 4: Case of Defamation and Blasphemy (2018)
Facts:
An Afghan journalist was accused of blasphemy after publishing articles critical of religious authorities.
Legal Issue:
Blasphemy laws under Afghan Penal Code and Islamic provisions clash with freedom of speech.
Outcome:
The journalist faced prosecution; international human rights groups condemned the charges.
Case highlighted tension between freedom of expression and religious protections.
Comparative Insight:
Western legal systems generally protect freedom of speech but may have hate speech laws.
Some Muslim-majority countries have strict blasphemy laws; enforcement varies.
Afghanistan’s case typifies challenges balancing tradition and modern rights.
Case 5: Drug Trafficking Case under Afghan Penal Code (2016)
Facts:
A group of individuals were prosecuted for large-scale drug trafficking, involving opium, Afghanistan’s main illicit export.
Legal Issue:
Drug trafficking is severely punished under Afghan law, including capital punishment.
Outcome:
Convictions led to long prison sentences and some death penalties.
Afghan government cooperates with international anti-narcotics efforts.
Comparative Insight:
Western countries often impose long imprisonment for drug trafficking; capital punishment is rare.
Afghanistan faces unique challenges due to the economy’s dependence on opium cultivation.
Legal enforcement is complicated by corruption and insurgent control.
4. Key Comparative Themes
Sharia Influence: Afghanistan’s criminal law integrates Islamic principles more deeply than secular systems, affecting punishments and procedural rules.
Judicial Capacity: Compared to Western and some civil law countries, Afghan courts often lack independence, resources, and capacity to enforce criminal law effectively.
Human Rights Compliance: Afghanistan struggles to balance traditional norms and international human rights obligations, especially in cases involving corporal punishment, women’s rights, and freedom of expression.
Customary Law: Informal justice mechanisms often handle criminal disputes, which contrasts with formal judicial dominance in Western systems.
5. Summary
| Case Focus | Afghan Legal Approach | Comparative Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Theft and Hudood Punishments | Corporal punishment under Sharia | Prohibited in Western jurisdictions |
| Arbitrary Detention | Weak enforcement of due process | Strong judicial review in common/civil law |
| Child Marriage | Criminalized but enforcement challenging | Increasingly criminalized globally |
| Blasphemy | Criminalized, conflicting with free speech | Free speech protected in most Western law |
| Drug Trafficking | Severe penalties including death penalty | Severe but rarely death penalty in West |
RELATED Blog
0 comments