Flogging For Moral Crimes Prosecutions
Introduction
Flogging, also known as whipping, is a corporal punishment involving striking a person with a whip or rod. It is used in some countries as a penalty for moral crimes, such as adultery, fornication, alcohol consumption, and other acts considered offenses against public morality or religious law.
While flogging is criticized by international human rights bodies as cruel, inhumane, and degrading punishment, it remains legally sanctioned in some jurisdictions, particularly in countries applying Sharia (Islamic) law or other customary legal frameworks.
Moral Crimes: Common Examples
Adultery and fornication
Alcohol consumption or intoxication
Homosexual acts
Blasphemy or apostasy
Dress code violations (e.g., indecent dressing)
Legal Justifications for Flogging
Based on Islamic criminal law (Hudood or Hudud punishments) derived from Quranic injunctions and Hadith.
Incorporated into national penal codes in some Islamic states (e.g., Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan).
Sometimes justified as a deterrent against violations of moral and religious norms.
Case Law & Examples of Flogging for Moral Crimes
1. The Case of Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani (Iran, 2010)
Crime: Adultery
Punishment: Initial sentence included stoning (death) and flogging for adultery.
Details:
Sakineh was convicted of adultery in Iran. She was sentenced to death by stoning and flogging. The case sparked international outrage due to the cruel nature of the punishment and procedural irregularities.
Legal Context:
Iranian law imposes flogging as a punishment for fornication/adultery when certain evidentiary standards are met. The Quran prescribes flogging (typically 100 lashes) for unmarried offenders and stoning for married offenders.
Outcome:
International pressure led to delays and reconsideration, but flogging remains legally sanctioned under Iran’s Islamic Penal Code for moral crimes.
Significance:
Highlights use of corporal punishment in cases of sexual morality.
Showcases tension between national religious law and international human rights.
2. Sharia Law Punishments in Sudan (2000s)
Crime: Alcohol consumption and fornication
Punishment: Flogging (up to 40 lashes) for consumption of alcohol or illicit sexual relations.
Details:
Sudan’s 1991 Criminal Code based on Sharia law includes flogging for “moral offenses” like alcohol drinking and fornication.
Prosecutions:
Multiple documented cases exist where people were publicly flogged for these offenses, often criticized by international human rights organizations.
Legal Context:
Sudan's laws derive from Islamic jurisprudence, and flogging is used as a public deterrent.
Significance:
Illustrates how corporal punishment is embedded in national law.
Often disproportionate and arbitrary, leading to debates on fairness and human dignity.
3. Case of Raif Badawi (Saudi Arabia, 2014)
Crime: “Insulting Islam” and “apostasy” (moral/religious crimes)
Punishment: 1,000 lashes (flogging), plus 10 years imprisonment.
Details:
Raif Badawi, a Saudi blogger, was sentenced to flogging for creating a liberal website and criticizing religious authorities.
Legal Context:
Saudi Arabia’s legal system uses flogging for crimes against religion and morality, derived from Wahhabi interpretation of Sharia law.
Outcome:
International human rights campaigns demanded his release. The flogging was carried out in public sessions but was suspended several times due to health concerns.
Significance:
Case highlights the use of flogging as punishment for moral/religious “crimes.”
Demonstrates international legal and political challenges of corporal punishment.
4. Pakistan’s Hudood Ordinance Cases (1980s - present)
Crime: Adultery, fornication, and alcohol use
Punishment: Flogging and imprisonment under Hudood Ordinance laws.
Details:
Pakistan’s Hudood Ordinances (introduced in 1979) provide flogging for zina (adultery and fornication) and consumption of alcohol.
Legal Process:
These cases often involve complex legal proceedings and are controversial for:
Potential misuse against women,
Burden of proof,
Harsh corporal punishments.
Significance:
Hudood laws illustrate codification of flogging for moral crimes in state law.
Frequently challenged by local and international human rights advocates.
5. Case of Ali Hussain (Brunei, 2019)
Crime: Alcohol consumption
Punishment: Public flogging (24 lashes).
Details:
Ali Hussain, a non-Muslim, was publicly flogged in Brunei after being convicted of consuming alcohol, prohibited under Brunei’s Syariah Penal Code (implemented in 2019).
Legal Context:
Brunei’s Syariah Penal Code includes flogging for moral offenses like alcohol use and same-sex relations.
Significance:
Showcases recent enforcement of corporal punishment.
Highlights application to both Muslims and non-Muslims.
Legal and Human Rights Perspectives
International Law:
The UN Convention Against Torture prohibits cruel, inhuman, or degrading punishment.
Flogging for moral crimes is widely condemned by human rights organizations.
National Law:
Some countries consider flogging a religious obligation.
Others have abolished flogging or reduced its use.
Criticism:
Risk of arbitrary punishment.
Disproportionate impact on women and minorities.
Often carried out publicly to intimidate.
Summary
| Case / Country | Crime | Punishment | Legal Framework | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sakineh Mohammadi (Iran) | Adultery | Flogging + Stoning | Islamic Penal Code | International outcry over cruel punishment |
| Sudan (various cases) | Alcohol, fornication | Flogging (40 lashes) | Sharia-based criminal code | Use as deterrent, public punishment |
| Raif Badawi (Saudi Arabia) | Apostasy, blasphemy | 1,000 lashes + prison | Wahhabi interpretation of Sharia | Freedom of expression vs religious offense |
| Pakistan Hudood Ordinance Cases | Zina, alcohol | Flogging + imprisonment | Hudood Ordinance | Controversial gender and proof issues |
| Ali Hussain (Brunei, 2019) | Alcohol consumption | 24 lashes | Syariah Penal Code | Recent enforcement on non-Muslims |
RELATED Blog
0 comments