Parallel Police Justice Systems Under Taliban
1. Overview
Since the Taliban’s return to power in Afghanistan (especially post-2021), the justice landscape includes parallel police and justice systems operating alongside or outside the formal state institutions. The Taliban maintain their own law enforcement and judiciary — often referred to as Sharia-based police and courts — enforcing their interpretation of Islamic law, often distinct from the previous Afghan government’s formal police and judiciary.
Key features:
Separate chains of command and authority.
Enforce Taliban’s strict interpretation of Sharia law.
Often lack formal legal procedures recognized under international standards.
Handle criminal cases, social order violations, and moral policing.
Sometimes operate informally or extrajudicially.
2. Legal and Institutional Framework
Taliban police operate under Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) and edicts from Taliban leadership.
No formal codified laws like the Afghan Penal Code are fully applied.
Enforcement includes moral policing (gender roles, dress codes), and criminal offenses.
Parallel courts handle cases rapidly, often with corporal punishment or summary judgments.
Detailed Case Law Examples
✅ Case 1: Enforcement of Dress Codes in Kabul (2022)
Facts:
Several women were detained by Taliban police for not adhering to mandated dress codes (full hijab, burqa).
Process:
Women were taken to Taliban-run police stations.
No formal charges or trials; punishments included warnings, fines, or public shaming.
Family or community elders sometimes involved in mediation.
Outcome:
Highlighted the extrajudicial nature of Taliban policing.
Women’s rights activists condemned the abuses.
Significance:
Reflects Taliban’s use of parallel policing to enforce social norms without due process.
✅ Case 2: Theft Case Adjudicated by Taliban Police in Helmand (2022)
Facts:
A man accused of stealing livestock was apprehended by Taliban police.
Process:
The accused was brought before Taliban police who acted as both investigators and judges.
The decision was made based on confession and witness testimony.
The punishment included flogging and repayment of stolen goods.
Outcome:
No formal trial; swift punitive action under Taliban interpretation of hudood (Islamic penal laws).
Significance:
Demonstrates Taliban police’s role in parallel justice with summary punishments.
✅ Case 3: Adjudication of Domestic Violence by Taliban Police, Kandahar (2023)
Facts:
A woman complained to Taliban police about her husband’s abuse.
Process:
Taliban police summoned the husband.
Rather than formal court proceedings, the police mediated a settlement.
The husband was ordered to pay diyya (compensation) and promise not to repeat the abuse.
Outcome:
No formal court case; resolution through police-led mediation.
Limited victim protection; enforcement depended on local commanders.
Significance:
Illustrates restorative but informal justice within Taliban policing.
✅ Case 4: Taliban Police Crackdown on Protests in Herat (2022)
Facts:
Women protesting for education rights were dispersed by Taliban police.
Process:
Protestors were detained without charges.
Some were physically beaten; others held overnight.
No access to legal representation or formal hearings.
Outcome:
International condemnation of arbitrary arrests.
No accountability for abuses by Taliban police.
Significance:
Reflects parallel policing’s role in political repression.
✅ Case 5: Taliban Police Handling Armed Robbery in Nangarhar (2023)
Facts:
A gang of armed robbers was arrested by Taliban police.
Process:
Police acted as arresting officers and judges.
Suspects were publicly flogged and given imprisonment in Taliban-run facilities.
No formal investigation or independent trial.
Outcome:
Rapid “justice” meted out through Taliban police channels.
Lacked transparency and procedural fairness.
Significance:
Shows the blending of police and judiciary functions within Taliban systems.
✅ Case 6: Juvenile Offenders Dealt With by Taliban Police in Balkh (2023)
Facts:
Two teenagers caught stealing food were detained by Taliban police.
Process:
Instead of formal trial, Taliban police ordered community service and moral instruction.
Family involvement emphasized; corporal punishment avoided due to age.
Outcome:
Informal restorative justice approach by Taliban police.
No official records or follow-up.
Significance:
Highlights flexibility in Taliban policing but absence of formal juvenile justice procedures.
3. Analysis
Taliban police justice operates parallel to formal Afghan police and courts but with no separation of powers.
Police act as investigators, prosecutors, judges, and enforcers.
Trials often lack due process safeguards (right to counsel, appeal, presumption of innocence).
Punishments include corporal (flogging), financial (diyya), imprisonment, or social sanctions.
The system emphasizes speed and control over legal fairness.
Vulnerable groups (women, children, minorities) are particularly at risk.
The parallel system undermines the rule of law and complicates reintegration of formal justice institutions.
4. Summary Table of Cases
| Case No. | Type of Crime/Issue | Taliban Police Role | Justice Mechanism | Outcome | Key Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dress code enforcement | Arrest & informal sanction | Extrajudicial policing | Warnings, fines, shaming | Moral policing without trial |
| 2 | Theft (livestock) | Arrest, judgment, punishment | Summary judgment & corporal punishment | Flogging, restitution | Police act as judge and enforcer |
| 3 | Domestic violence | Mediation and resolution | Informal settlement | Diyya and promise not to repeat | Restorative justice by police |
| 4 | Political protest crackdown | Detention, suppression | No trial | Beatings, arbitrary detention | Political repression tool |
| 5 | Armed robbery | Arrest and sentencing | Summary trial by police | Flogging, imprisonment | Lack of judicial independence |
| 6 | Juvenile theft | Detention, community service | Informal restorative measures | Community service, moral teaching | No formal juvenile justice |
5. Conclusion
The Taliban maintain a parallel police justice system that bypasses formal legal frameworks and due process norms. This system is characterized by:
Merging police and judicial roles.
Swift, often harsh punishments.
Enforcement of strict moral codes.
Limited transparency or accountability.
Reliance on Islamic law interpreted by the Taliban.
Absence of procedural safeguards and protections for vulnerable groups.
While it provides rapid conflict resolution and social control under Taliban rule, this parallel system undermines human rights and the rule of law. Its coexistence with remnants of formal Afghan institutions creates confusion and legal uncertainty.
RELATED Blog
0 comments