Environmental Crimes: Illegal Dumping, Pollution, And Wildlife Offenses
1. Introduction to Environmental Crimes
Environmental crimes are violations of laws intended to protect natural resources, ecosystems, and public health. They include:
Illegal dumping: Disposal of hazardous, industrial, or municipal waste in unauthorized areas.
Pollution offenses: Air, water, and soil pollution that violates statutory limits under laws like the Air Act (1981) and Water Act (1974).
Wildlife offenses: Hunting, poaching, or trafficking of protected species under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972.
These crimes are considered cognizable and non-bailable offenses in many cases due to their severe impact on public health and biodiversity.
2. Legal Framework in India
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 – Regulates water pollution, mandates consent for discharge.
Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 – Controls air pollution from industries and vehicles.
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 – Umbrella law for environmental protection, empowers central government to set rules.
Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 – Protects endangered species, prohibits hunting and trade.
Hazardous Waste Management Rules, 1989 – Governs disposal of hazardous waste.
The National Green Tribunal (NGT) also plays a key role in adjudicating environmental disputes efficiently.
3. Landmark Case Law in Environmental Crimes
Case 1: M.C. Mehta v. Union of India – Oleum Gas Leak Case (1986) 2 SCC 176
Facts:
A chemical plant in Delhi leaked oleum gas, endangering public health.
The case highlighted industrial negligence causing pollution.
Supreme Court Observations:
Introduced the principle of absolute liability for industries handling hazardous substances.
Liability exists regardless of negligence or precautions.
Compensation must be provided to victims.
Impact:
Strengthened pollution control and accountability of industries.
Applied later to chemical, pharmaceutical, and industrial waste dumping cases.
Case 2: Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India (1996) 3 SCC 212
Facts:
Hazardous industrial waste was dumped in rural areas in Tamil Nadu, contaminating soil and water.
Supreme Court Observations:
Industries were held strictly liable for environmental damage.
Directed clean-up and remediation of affected land.
Established that environmental protection is a public duty, not optional.
Impact:
Landmark case for illegal dumping and hazardous waste liability.
Reinforced the polluter pays principle.
Case 3: M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath (1997) 1 SCC 388 – Taj Trapezium Case
Facts:
Industrial emissions in Agra threatened the Taj Mahal, causing stone discoloration due to air pollution.
Supreme Court Observations:
Ordered closure of highly polluting industries in sensitive areas.
Required installation of pollution control devices.
Reinforced sustainable development vs industrial activity.
Impact:
Key precedent for air pollution control and industrial compliance.
Showed the court’s active role in balancing environmental protection and economic activity.
Case 4: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India (1996 onwards)
Facts:
Concerned illegal deforestation in forests across India.
Supreme Court Observations:
Issued orders to protect forests, stop logging, and preserve biodiversity.
Recognized forests as ecologically sensitive areas.
Enforced environmental monitoring and NGT-like oversight through courts.
Impact:
Strengthened protection of wildlife habitats indirectly.
Provided framework for controlling environmental offenses beyond specific incidents.
Case 5: Wildlife Trust of India v. Union of India (2003)
Facts:
Illegal poaching and trade of tiger and elephant parts.
Supreme Court Observations:
Emphasized strict enforcement of Wildlife Protection Act, 1972.
Directed states to strengthen anti-poaching mechanisms and forest guards.
Impact:
Reinforced legal protection of endangered species.
Highlighted criminal accountability in wildlife offenses.
Case 6: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India (1996) 5 SCC 647
Facts:
Tanneries in Tamil Nadu discharged untreated effluents into rivers.
Supreme Court Observations:
Applied polluter pays principle and precautionary principle.
Ordered strict closure of non-compliant units and remediation of water pollution.
Impact:
Landmark for water pollution control.
Demonstrated courts’ proactive role in enforcing environmental compliance.
Case 7: National Green Tribunal (NGT) – Sterlite Copper Plant, Tuticorin (2018)
Facts:
Community protests due to air and water pollution from copper smelting plant.
NGT Observations:
Ordered closure of the plant for violation of environmental norms.
Emphasized community rights and public health protection.
Impact:
Showed effective use of judicial oversight in environmental crimes.
Reinforced local community protection against industrial pollution.
4. Summary Table of Environmental Crimes and Cases
| Type of Crime | Key Legislation | Landmark Case | Principle Established |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industrial Pollution | Environment Protection Act, Air/Water Act | M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath | Sustainable development vs industry |
| Hazardous Waste Dumping | Hazardous Waste Rules | Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action | Polluter pays principle, strict liability |
| Air & Water Pollution | Air/Water Act | Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum | Precautionary principle, remediation |
| Wildlife Offenses | Wildlife Protection Act | Wildlife Trust of India v. Union of India | Strict protection of endangered species |
| Forest & Biodiversity | Forest Conservation Act | T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad | Conservation of forests and habitats |
| Community Pollution Issues | NGT Act, Environmental Acts | Sterlite Copper Plant Case | Public health protection, environmental enforcement |
5. Key Takeaways
Strict Liability: Industries causing environmental harm are strictly liable regardless of intent.
Polluter Pays Principle: Offenders must compensate for damage caused.
Precautionary Principle: Preventive action must be taken even if harm is not fully proven.
Judicial Oversight: Supreme Court and NGT actively monitor compliance and remediation.
Wildlife Protection: Strong enforcement of laws to prevent poaching and illegal trade.
RELATED Blog
0 comments