Criminal Liability For Environmental Destruction And Pollution
✅ What Is Criminal Environmental Liability?
Criminal liability for environmental destruction arises when an individual, company, or government body willfully or negligently commits acts that cause significant harm to the environment—such as air, water, or soil pollution, illegal deforestation, hazardous waste dumping, etc.—in violation of environmental laws.
These acts can lead to:
Loss of life
Damage to public health
Long-term ecological degradation
✅ Legal Framework (Common Features Across Jurisdictions)
Most countries recognize environmental crimes under:
Environmental Protection Acts
Criminal Codes
Water/Air Pollution Control Acts
Hazardous Waste Regulations
Typical criminal offenses include:
Illegal discharge of pollutants
Industrial accidents due to negligence
Wildlife trafficking and poaching
Unauthorized deforestation or mining
Causing environmental disasters
🔍 Key Legal Principles
Strict Liability: Some environmental laws impose liability even without criminal intent.
Vicarious Liability: Corporations can be held responsible for the acts of their employees.
Precautionary Principle: Action must be taken to prevent harm even if some cause-effect relationships are not fully established scientifically.
Polluter Pays Principle: The polluter bears the cost of damage.
Public Trust Doctrine: Natural resources are held in trust by the state for public use.
🧑⚖️ Landmark Cases on Criminal Liability for Environmental Pollution
1. M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Oleum Gas Leak Case, 1986) – India
Facts: A serious gas leak occurred from a fertilizer plant in Delhi owned by Shriram Foods and Fertilizers, killing and injuring many.
Legal Issue: Whether the company could be held criminally liable under environmental laws.
Held: The Supreme Court evolved the “Absolute Liability” principle, stating that enterprises engaged in hazardous activities are absolutely liable for any damage caused, without exceptions.
Significance: Established that in cases involving dangerous industries, negligence need not be proved—mere occurrence of damage invokes liability.
2. Union Carbide Corporation v. Union of India (Bhopal Gas Tragedy Case, 1984)
Facts: A gas leak at Union Carbide’s plant in Bhopal killed thousands and injured over half a million.
Issue: Corporate and managerial criminal liability for environmental disaster.
Held: Criminal charges of culpable homicide not amounting to murder were initially brought. Although diluted later, the case remains a pivotal example of corporate criminal responsibility for environmental disaster.
Significance: This tragedy highlighted the need for strict environmental regulation and criminal prosecution for negligent corporate conduct.
3. Vellore Citizens’ Welfare Forum v. Union of India (1996) – India
Facts: Tanneries in Tamil Nadu discharged untreated effluents into agricultural lands and water bodies.
Issue: Whether criminal sanctions could be imposed for repeated violations of pollution norms.
Held: The Supreme Court recognized the precautionary and polluter pays principles and held industries criminally and civilly liable for environmental degradation.
Significance: Although largely civil, this case led to penal sanctions under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, against non-compliant industries.
4. State of Maharashtra v. M/s. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. (2010)
Facts: The company was charged for dumping construction waste into the Mithi River and mangrove forests during a project.
Issue: Criminal violation of environmental norms under Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) rules.
Held: The Bombay High Court upheld the company’s criminal prosecution under Section 15 of the Environment (Protection) Act.
Significance: This case enforced that corporate actors can face criminal trial for ecological destruction even in the course of government projects.
5. T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India (1996–onward series)
Facts: The case started as a PIL for forest protection but expanded into wide-ranging issues including illegal mining, deforestation, and pollution.
Issue: Liability for unregulated and illegal use of forest land.
Held: The Supreme Court issued orders leading to closure of illegal sawmills, cancellation of mining leases, and prosecution of violators.
Significance: Created a judicial regime for holding private and government bodies criminally liable for environmental violations.
6. Municipal Council, Ratlam v. Vardhichand (1980)
Facts: Ratlam Municipality failed to prevent open defecation and sewage overflow, despite public health concerns.
Issue: Whether a public authority can be criminally liable for environmental nuisance.
Held: The Supreme Court directed criminal proceedings against the municipality, holding that financial inability is no excuse for neglecting public health.
Significance: Reinforced criminal accountability of public officials for environmental and sanitary violations.
7. Sterlite Industries (Tuticorin Plant Case, 2013–2018)
Facts: The Sterlite copper smelting plant in Tamil Nadu was accused of air and groundwater pollution causing public health hazards.
Issue: Criminal prosecution under environmental laws and closure orders.
Held: TN Pollution Control Board ordered closure and prosecution; the Supreme Court upheld a ₹100 crore fine.
Significance: Demonstrated the criminal, administrative, and civil consequences of prolonged environmental harm by an industrial giant.
🔚 Summary: Key Takeaways
| Principle | Description |
|---|---|
| Absolute Liability | Industries engaging in hazardous activities are liable without exception for any damage. |
| Corporate Criminal Liability | Companies and their management can be prosecuted for environmental crimes. |
| Public Official Responsibility | Municipal and government officers can face criminal action for failure to prevent environmental harm. |
| Environmental Statutes | Violations of EPA, Water Act, and Air Act can attract imprisonment, fines, or both. |
| Role of Courts | Judiciary has used PILs and suo motu powers to enforce criminal liability in environmental cases. |
RELATED Blog
0 comments