Research On Technology And Aviation Crime In Nepal
Research on Technology and Aviation Crime in Nepal: Detailed Case Analysis
Legal Framework
Civil Aviation Act, 2058 (2001)
Governs aviation operations in Nepal, including aircraft safety, air traffic control, pilot licensing, and maintenance.
Violations may include unsafe operation, falsification of documents, unauthorized flights, or maintenance negligence.
Muluki Criminal Code, 2074 (Nepal)
Sections on criminal negligence, endangering public safety, fraud, and misuse of technology.
Electronic Transactions Act, 2063
Deals with cybercrimes, including hacking, data falsification, and unauthorized access to technological systems.
Civil Aviation Authority of Nepal (CAAN) Regulations
Set technical and operational standards for aviation safety.
Non-compliance can lead to administrative penalties and criminal liability.
Case 1: Wide-Body Aircraft Procurement Corruption (2017–2024)
Facts:
Nepal Airlines Corporation (NAC) purchased two Airbus A330-200 aircraft using intermediaries. Evidence showed potential bribery, falsified documentation, and irregular procurement procedures.
Legal Issues:
Procurement fraud and misrepresentation of aircraft specifications.
Potential misuse of technological documentation in vendor contracts.
Violation of procurement and aviation safety oversight regulations.
Decision:
Special Court convicted four officials for corruption, issuing prison sentences and fines.
Acquittal occurred for some individuals due to lack of evidence of intent.
Significance:
Demonstrates how technological documentation in aviation procurement can be a source of criminal liability.
Highlights intersection of technology, corruption, and aviation law.
Case 2: Incorrect Speed Card Leading to Aircraft Crash (2024)
Facts:
A CRJ-200LR aircraft crash was traced to an incorrect speed card used during takeoff.
Legal Issues:
Falsification or negligent maintenance of critical technical documentation.
Violation of aviation safety regulations.
Potential criminal liability for staff responsible for verification and maintenance.
Decision:
Government panel identified negligence and non-compliance.
Recommendations for stricter regulatory oversight and personnel accountability were issued.
Significance:
Highlights how minor technological errors or falsifications can result in fatal accidents.
Establishes that negligent handling of technological data constitutes aviation crime.
Case 3: Unauthorized Drone Operation Over Kathmandu Valley (2021)
Facts:
A private company operated drones for commercial filming near Kathmandu, violating airspace restrictions.
Legal Issues:
Unauthorized use of UAV technology in controlled airspace.
Endangerment of public safety and aviation operations.
Violation of CAAN drone regulations and criminal negligence provisions.
Decision:
Fines were imposed, drones were confiscated, and operators received warnings.
Regulatory compliance measures were reinforced.
Significance:
Demonstrates that misuse of aerial technology constitutes an aviation crime even without physical damage.
Sets precedent for drone regulation enforcement.
Case 4: Air Traffic Control Negligence Leading to Near-Collision (2023)
Facts:
A near-collision occurred between two aircraft in Kathmandu airspace due to mismanagement by air traffic control (ATC) personnel.
Legal Issues:
Failure to properly manage technological systems (radar, communication) leading to public endangerment.
Violation of Civil Aviation regulations and potential criminal liability under negligence provisions.
Decision:
Suspensions of ATC staff and internal disciplinary action.
No criminal conviction reported yet, but regulatory reforms were initiated.
Significance:
Illustrates how human error in conjunction with technology can constitute aviation crime.
Highlights need for robust training and system redundancy.
Case 5: Maintenance Fraud – Substandard Aircraft Repairs (2024)
Facts:
Engineers allegedly attempted to repair an aircraft leak using inappropriate materials instead of proper maintenance protocols.
Legal Issues:
Negligence in aircraft maintenance and violation of safety regulations.
Misuse of technology and falsification of maintenance records.
Potential criminal liability for endangering lives.
Decision:
Investigation initiated; personnel were reprimanded and disciplinary action taken.
Legal proceedings for criminal negligence are ongoing.
Significance:
Maintenance fraud is recognized as a technology-related aviation crime.
Highlights the legal responsibility of aviation engineers and maintenance staff.
Case 6: Data Tampering in Pilot Licensing (2022)
Facts:
An investigation revealed falsification of training records and flight simulation data to obtain pilot licenses illegally.
Legal Issues:
Misrepresentation of technological data to gain certification.
Breach of Civil Aviation Act and Electronic Transactions Act provisions.
Criminal liability for fraud and endangerment of public safety.
Decision:
Pilot licenses were revoked; officials involved faced criminal charges.
Training institution penalized for compliance failures.
Significance:
Shows how manipulation of technology-based data (simulators, logs) can lead to aviation crimes.
Reinforces the importance of regulatory oversight.
Key Legal Principles from These Cases
Technological Documentation is Central: Errors, falsifications, or misuse of technical data are treated as serious offences.
Human-Technology Interface: Negligence in operating technology (ATC systems, drones, maintenance) can lead to criminal liability.
Regulatory Oversight: Civil Aviation Authority enforcement is critical to prevent technological violations.
Criminal vs. Administrative Liability: Aviation crimes may result in fines, suspension, or imprisonment depending on intent and consequences.
Emerging Drone and UAV Regulations: Non-compliance with drone regulations is now a recognized form of aviation technology crime.
These six cases collectively show that aviation crimes in Nepal increasingly involve technology, whether through procurement, maintenance, air traffic control, drone misuse, or falsified digital records.
RELATED Blog
0 comments