Dowry-Related Offences And Gaps In Enforcement Of Penal Provisions In Nepal
1. Introduction
Dowry-related offenses have been a persistent social issue in Nepal, particularly in the context of gender-based violence. The practice of dowry involves the payment or transfer of property from the bride’s family to the groom’s family, often leading to violence, harassment, and even deaths when demands for dowry are not met.
Legal Framework in Nepal
The main legislative framework addressing dowry-related crimes in Nepal includes:
Muluki Criminal Code (MCC) 2074 (2017):
Section 146: Dowry-related offenses such as harassment and violence.
Section 157: Physical and mental torture related to dowry demands.
Section 158: Dowry death (death caused by dowry-related violence).
Domestic Violence (Offenses and Punishment) Act 2075 (2018):
Provides a broader understanding of domestic violence, which may include dowry-related violence.
Despite these legal provisions, enforcement gaps persist, including:
Limited awareness of legal rights among victims.
Social and cultural acceptance of dowry practices.
Weak implementation of laws and lack of victim protection mechanisms.
2. Legal Provisions Related to Dowry Offenses
a. Dowry-related Crimes under the Muluki Criminal Code (MCC)
Section 146 of the MCC criminalizes dowry harassment, making it illegal for a husband or his family to demand or accept dowry, or to physically or mentally torture the wife due to dowry-related issues.
Section 157 addresses physical and mental torture relating to dowry demands and stipulates imprisonment and fines for the perpetrators.
Section 158 specifically targets dowry deaths, where the death of a woman occurs as a result of dowry-related violence or harassment.
b. Domestic Violence (Offenses and Punishment) Act
Defines domestic violence broadly to include physical, mental, sexual, or economic abuse in marital relationships, which can encompass dowry-related abuses.
3. Major Case Laws on Dowry-Related Offenses in Nepal
Case 1: Government of Nepal v. Ramesh Kumar Shrestha (2012)
Issue: Dowry harassment leading to physical and mental abuse.
Facts: The victim, Sita Devi, was continuously harassed by her husband and in-laws for failing to fulfill dowry demands. She was subjected to severe physical and mental torture.
Evidence: The victim’s medical reports showed signs of physical abuse, and witnesses testified to the mental trauma she suffered due to constant dowry demands.
Court Decision:
The Kathmandu District Court convicted the husband and in-laws under Section 146 of the MCC for dowry-related harassment.
The husband was sentenced to two years imprisonment, and the in-laws were fined and ordered to pay compensation to the victim.
Significance: This case was notable because it was one of the first dowry harassment cases under the MCC where the court focused on mental abuse alongside physical violence.
Case 2: Government of Nepal v. Shanta Kumari (2014)
Issue: Dowry death and failure of police investigation.
Facts: Shanta Kumari, a newlywed, died in suspicious circumstances just two months after her marriage. Her family claimed that her husband and in-laws were demanding additional dowry. They alleged that her death was a result of dowry-related violence.
Evidence: The victim’s family produced testimonies from neighbors who had witnessed the harassment. The autopsy report was inconclusive but suggested signs of physical trauma.
Court Decision:
The court initially dropped the dowry death charge under Section 158 due to lack of direct evidence.
The victim’s family appealed, arguing that the investigation had been biased and insufficient. The case was later reopened due to public pressure and media attention.
Significance: This case highlighted the enforcement gap in investigating dowry deaths, where police often fail to pursue thorough investigations, especially in rural areas.
Case 3: Government of Nepal v. Krishna Kumar Yadav (2016)
Issue: Dowry demand and physical violence.
Facts: The accused, Krishna Kumar Yadav, had repeatedly demanded additional dowry from his wife’s family, despite receiving an initial dowry. His wife was beaten regularly and eventually attempted suicide as a result of the constant abuse.
Evidence: The victim’s medical records showed repeated injuries caused by physical violence, and witness statements corroborated the allegations of dowry harassment.
Court Decision:
The court convicted Krishna Kumar Yadav under Section 146 of the MCC for dowry harassment and physical violence.
He was sentenced to three years in prison and ordered to pay compensation for the victim’s medical expenses and psychological counseling.
Significance: This case illustrated the court’s strict stance against dowry-related physical violence, showing a growing awareness of women’s rights in dowry harassment situations.
Case 4: Government of Nepal v. Laxmi Devi Gurung (2017)
Issue: Failure of police to act on dowry harassment complaints.
Facts: Laxmi Devi Gurung repeatedly complained to the police about her husband’s demands for additional dowry, which led to verbal abuse and physical violence. Despite reporting the matter, the police did not take immediate action.
Evidence: Police records showed that Laxmi had filed multiple complaints, but investigations were not pursued actively.
Court Decision:
The court found the police’s failure to act on the victim's complaints as a violation of due process and ordered a disciplinary inquiry against the officers involved.
It also ordered the husband to pay compensation to Laxmi for psychological trauma.
Significance: This case underscored the enforcement gap in addressing dowry harassment, particularly regarding police indifference and delayed responses to victims’ complaints.
Case 5: Government of Nepal v. Radha Kumari Tamang (2019)
Issue: Dowry death and judicial delay in proceedings.
Facts: Radha Kumari Tamang was found dead in her matrimonial home, with signs of blunt force trauma. The victim’s family alleged dowry-related violence, claiming her husband and in-laws had been pressuring her for more dowry.
Evidence: There were conflicting autopsy results, but there was sufficient evidence of domestic violence before her death.
Court Decision:
The case was delayed for several years due to ongoing investigations and disputes over the cause of death.
Finally, the husband was convicted under Section 158 for dowry death, but the trial process took over four years, highlighting delays in the justice system.
Significance: This case exposed the judicial delay in dowry-related cases, especially in cases involving dowry death, where judicial processes can be slow and impacted by various procedural issues.
4. Observations and Analysis
| Issue | Observation | Judicial Trend |
|---|---|---|
| Legal Gaps | Limited awareness of the full scope of dowry-related offenses | Courts focus primarily on physical abuse; less on economic and psychological abuse |
| Enforcement Issues | Police reluctance and bias in dowry death investigations | Courts increasingly holding police accountable for failure to investigate |
| Victim Protection | Inconsistent application of victim compensation and protection measures | Courts beginning to ensure compensation and counseling for victims |
| Judicial Delay | Long delays in trials, particularly in dowry death cases | Slow judicial processes exacerbate victim suffering |
| Cultural Factors | Dowry practice deeply ingrained in society | Courts attempting to challenge social norms through legal rulings |
5. Recommendations
Increase police training and awareness of dowry-related violence and ensure immediate action on complaints.
Streamline judicial processes for dowry-related cases to minimize delays and ensure timely justice.
Victim protection laws should be enforced strictly, and adequate compensation should be provided for psychological trauma and medical treatment.
Public awareness campaigns to challenge societal acceptance of dowry demands and violence.
Strengthen the enforcement of domestic violence laws alongside the dowry-related provisions under the MCC.
6. Conclusion
Dowry-related offenses remain a serious issue in Nepal, with legal provisions in place but gaps in enforcement. While the Muluki Criminal Code and Domestic Violence Act criminalize dowry harassment and dowry deaths, cases show that weak police investigations, judicial delays, and social norms often hinder justice for victims. There is a need for better implementation of existing laws, immediate victim protection, and more aggressive judicial oversight to ensure that dowry-related offenses are adequately addressed and that perpetrators are held accountable.
RELATED Blog
0 comments