Environmental Crimes Involving Destruction Of Marine Ecosystems
I. Understanding the Concepts
1. Environmental Crimes in Marine Ecosystems
Environmental crimes targeting marine ecosystems include:
Illegal fishing or overfishing (depleting fish stocks).
Pollution from oil spills, chemical discharge, or plastics.
Destruction of coral reefs or mangroves.
Dumping of hazardous waste into oceans.
Impacts:
Loss of biodiversity.
Collapse of fisheries and local livelihoods.
Long-term ecological imbalance.
Legal Frameworks:
National Laws:
India: Environment Protection Act 1986, Marine Pollution (Prevention) Act 1981
USA: Clean Water Act, Oil Pollution Act 1990
International Laws:
MARPOL Convention (Marine Pollution)
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)
Convention on Biological Diversity
II. Detailed Case Studies
Case 1: MV Prestige Oil Spill – Spain (2002)
Facts:
Oil tanker MV Prestige sank off the coast of Galicia, releasing over 63,000 tons of heavy fuel oil into the Atlantic.
Extensive contamination of beaches, destruction of marine life, and economic losses in fisheries.
Legal Mechanism:
Charges against ship owners and insurers for marine pollution and negligence.
MARPOL 73/78 (International Convention for Prevention of Pollution from Ships) invoked.
Judicial Outcome:
Spanish courts initially convicted the shipowner for environmental damage.
European Court of Justice emphasized liability for “ecological harm” and compensation to affected communities.
Significance:
Landmark case establishing accountability for transboundary marine pollution.
Case 2: Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill – USA (2010)
Facts:
Explosion on BP’s Deepwater Horizon rig released nearly 4.9 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.
Massive destruction of marine and coastal ecosystems, killing wildlife and affecting fisheries.
Legal Mechanism:
Oil Pollution Act (OPA), Clean Water Act violations.
Civil and criminal liability for negligence and environmental harm.
Judicial Outcome:
BP settled for over $20 billion in fines, cleanup costs, and compensation.
Multiple executives and contractors faced criminal investigations.
Significance:
Demonstrated the use of national environmental laws to prosecute large-scale marine ecosystem destruction.
Case 3: Sea Dumping of Hazardous Waste – Italy (Mafia, 2010)
Facts:
Italian Mafia organizations illegally dumped toxic waste into the Mediterranean, including heavy metals and industrial chemicals.
Significant harm to marine biodiversity and local fisheries.
Legal Mechanism:
Italian Environmental Crimes Code and international environmental law for marine pollution.
Judicial Outcome:
Courts convicted Mafia members and industrial collaborators.
Seizure of vessels and penalties imposed to prevent recurrence.
Significance:
Showed judicial willingness to prosecute organized crime for environmental damage.
Case 4: Vedanta Sterlite Copper Plant Effluent – India (Tamil Nadu, 2018)
Facts:
Effluent discharge from Vedanta’s Sterlite Copper plant contaminated nearby waterways and marine ecosystems.
Fishermen and coastal communities reported dead fish and declining yields.
Legal Mechanism:
Environment Protection Act, Water Act, and Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) norms invoked.
Judicial Outcome:
Tamil Nadu government ordered closure of the plant.
Courts supported environmental remediation and penalized violations.
Significance:
Highlighted national accountability mechanisms for industrial pollution affecting marine ecosystems.
Case 5: Illegal Fishing and Coral Destruction – Philippines (1990s–2000s)
Facts:
Dynamite and cyanide fishing destroyed coral reefs in the Tubbataha Reefs Natural Park.
Overfishing threatened marine biodiversity.
Legal Mechanism:
Philippine Fisheries Code, Wildlife Resources Conservation and Protection Act.
UNESCO World Heritage site protection provisions invoked.
Judicial Outcome:
Fishermen and traders fined; some prosecuted for illegal fishing and environmental damage.
Government launched coral reef restoration programs.
Significance:
Showed judicial and administrative coordination in protecting fragile marine ecosystems.
Case 6: Exxon Valdez Oil Spill – USA (1989)
Facts:
Exxon Valdez tanker spilled 11 million gallons of crude oil in Prince William Sound, Alaska.
Immediate death of marine wildlife and long-term ecological damage.
Legal Mechanism:
Clean Water Act, Oil Pollution Act of 1990.
Civil and punitive damages sought under U.S. environmental law.
Judicial Outcome:
Exxon initially faced $5 billion in punitive damages (later reduced by the Supreme Court).
Massive cleanup and compensation programs implemented.
Significance:
Served as a precedent for holding corporations accountable for marine ecosystem destruction.
Case 7: Coastal Mangrove Destruction – India (Prawn Farms, Odisha, 2000s)
Facts:
Illegal conversion of mangroves for prawn aquaculture degraded marine breeding grounds.
Led to coastal erosion, loss of fish stocks, and flood vulnerability.
Legal Mechanism:
Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) Act, Environment Protection Act, IPC sections for destruction of public resources.
Judicial Outcome:
Courts ordered mangrove restoration, closure of illegal farms, and compensation to affected communities.
Significance:
Demonstrated use of judicial power to restore marine habitats and penalize violators.
III. Key Legal Principles
Liability for Marine Ecosystem Damage:
Corporations, individuals, and organized groups can be held criminally and civilly liable for environmental destruction.
International Cooperation:
Cross-border pollution requires coordination under treaties like MARPOL and UNCLOS.
Restoration and Compensation:
Courts increasingly mandate ecological restoration and community compensation in addition to fines.
Preventive Measures:
Regulatory compliance, monitoring, and marine protected areas help prevent large-scale environmental crimes.
IV. Summary
Marine environmental crimes have global ecological, economic, and social consequences.
Judicial systems worldwide—India, USA, Europe, Philippines—use criminal and civil laws to punish offenders.
Case studies like Deepwater Horizon, Exxon Valdez, MV Prestige, and Vedanta Sterlite illustrate corporate accountability.
Cases on illegal fishing and mangrove destruction show environmental protection extends to community and biodiversity preservation.
RELATED Blog
0 comments