Judicial Review Of Criminal Convictions In China
🧠Overview: Judicial Review of Criminal Convictions in China
Judicial review in the Chinese criminal justice system allows for:
Appeals (上诉, shà ngsù):
Defendants, their lawyers, or prosecutors can appeal a criminal judgment to a higher-level court.
Governed by Articles 204–218 of the Criminal Procedure Law (CPL).
Retrials (再审, zà ishěn):
Cases may be reopened if new evidence emerges or if legal procedure violations are found.
Governed by Articles 237–253 CPL.
Supreme People’s Court Review:
The Supreme People’s Court (SPC) may approve retrials for cases of significant social impact, wrongful convictions, or misapplication of law.
Goals:
Correct wrongful convictions, ensure fairness, and maintain public confidence in the judiciary.
⚖️ 1. Sun Xiaoguo Case – Retrial for Death Penalty (Yunnan)
Location: Yunnan Province
Type: Murder, organized crime
Facts:
Sun Xiaoguo initially received a reduced sentence due to local corruption and falsified records.
Public outrage and investigation by higher authorities revealed judicial misconduct.
Judicial Review:
The Supreme People’s Court authorized retrial at the Yunnan High Court.
Sun Xiaoguo was sentenced to death, correcting the previous miscarriage of justice.
Significance:
Demonstrates the power of judicial review to correct wrongful convictions.
Highlights the role of central oversight in ensuring justice against local interference.
⚖️ 2. Nie Shubin Wrongful Execution Case (Shandong)
Location: Shandong Province
Type: Murder
Facts:
Nie Shubin was executed in 1995 for murder based on false testimony and procedural flaws.
Judicial Review:
In 2016, the Supreme People’s Court officially exonerated Nie Shubin after reviewing evidence, including DNA evidence that proved his innocence.
Significance:
Landmark case showing the Supreme Court’s role in posthumous judicial review.
Demonstrates growing importance of scientific evidence in criminal retrials.
⚖️ 3. Xiao Yang Gang Homicide Retrial (Guangdong, 2018)
Location: Guangdong Province
Type: Homicide
Facts:
Xiao Yang was convicted of intentional homicide.
Alleged irregularities in police investigation and forced confession were raised during appeal.
Judicial Review:
Higher court conducted retrial and examined forensic and procedural evidence.
Conviction was upheld, but sentence reduced due to mitigating circumstances.
Significance:
Shows how judicial review balances correcting errors with maintaining convictions where evidence is sufficient.
Reinforces procedural safeguards in criminal trials.
⚖️ 4. Zhang Yuhuan Wrongful Conviction Case (Hubei, 2018)
Location: Hubei Province
Type: Child murder
Facts:
Zhang Yuhuan was convicted of murdering two children in 1981 and spent 37 years in prison.
Evidence used in the original trial was inconsistent and lacked credibility.
Judicial Review:
Hubei High Court conducted retrial based on new forensic evidence.
Zhang Yuhuan was fully acquitted.
Significance:
One of the longest wrongful convictions overturned in China.
Highlights importance of judicial review in correcting historical miscarriages of justice.
⚖️ 5. Xu Hongsheng Economic Crime Case (Beijing, 2012)
Location: Beijing
Type: Financial fraud
Facts:
Xu Hongsheng was convicted for embezzlement, but appealed citing procedural irregularities in evidence collection.
Judicial Review:
Beijing Higher People’s Court reviewed the case.
Certain charges were dismissed, and the sentence was reduced from 10 years to 5 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Demonstrates judicial review’s function in correcting procedural mistakes without fully overturning convictions.
Emphasizes the courts’ attention to evidence admissibility and due process.
⚖️ 6. Li Zhuang Corruption Retrial (Zhejiang, 2007)
Location: Zhejiang Province
Type: Corruption
Facts:
Lawyer Li Zhuang was convicted of suborning perjury while defending a client in a corruption case.
Conviction was later found to involve judicial misconduct and overreach.
Judicial Review:
Supreme People’s Court authorized retrial.
Li Zhuang was acquitted in 2010, and his legal career was restored.
Significance:
Highlights the importance of judicial review in protecting lawyers and defendants from abuse of power.
Reinforces the system’s capacity to correct wrongful convictions even in politically sensitive contexts.
🧩 Key Observations
Judicial review ensures procedural fairness, correcting errors in lower courts.
Retrials can result in acquittal, sentence reduction, or confirmation, depending on new evidence.
Supreme People’s Court plays a central role in high-profile or wrongful conviction cases.
Wrongful convictions often stem from forced confessions, false testimony, or local interference.
Judicial review in China is growing in scope, especially with forensic science and public oversight.
RELATED Blog
0 comments